this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2024
615 points (99.5% liked)

HistoryPorn

4802 readers
92 users here now

If you would like to become a mod in this community, kindly PM the mod.

Relive the Past in Jaw-Dropping Detail!

HistoryPorn is for photographs (or, if it can be found, film) of the past, recent or distant! Give us a little snapshot of history!

Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.
  9. No genocide or atrocity denialism.

Pictures of old artifacts and museum pieces should go to History Artifacts

Illustrations and paintings should go to History Drawings

Related Communities:

Military Porn

Forgotten Weapons

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
PugJesus@lemmy.world
PugJesus@kbin.social
615
Photo of the Sphinx taken from a balloon before it was excavated. I can't find a date, but based on when it was excavated and the history of photography, some time between 1840 and 1867 (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 month ago by FlyingSquid@lemmy.world to c/historyporn@lemmy.world
60 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I looked all over for a date and got everything from "early 1800s" to "late 1800s" but nothing exact, so I had to make an educated guess. The first cameras practical enough to take such a photo were developed around 1840 and the excavations began in 1867.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 49 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Why didn't you just look at the metadata? It appears this photo was taken in the year "© All Rights Reserved"

[–] A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

Big "It appears you have internet network connectivity problems" energy

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I felt that copyrighting it in the year nothing might have been a typo.

Also, there's absolutely no question that it's public domain.

[–] Successful_Try543@feddit.org 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Also, there's absolutely no question that it's public domain.

AfaIk, this depends on whether we know the photographer. If the author of a work is unknown, it is deemed to be orphaned. In some countries, this may lead to problems when using the work.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Which country would not recognize a 19th century photo as public domain? Because the Berne Convention, which most countries are signatories to, would absolutely make it public domain.

[–] Successful_Try543@feddit.org 8 points 1 month ago

If the author is unknown because for example the author was deliberately anonymous or worked under a pseudonym, the Convention provides for a term of 50 years after publication ("after the work has been lawfully made available to the public"). However, if the identity of the author becomes known, the copyright term for known authors (50 years after death) applies.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berne_Convention

I didn't know the information of that section. As it's very very unlikely that the author of a 19th century photo is dead for less than 50 years, the uncertainty of someone claiming the copyright is close to zero.

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

A good year for art it was.