this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2024
114 points (90.1% liked)

Showerthoughts

30041 readers
1152 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. A showerthought should offer a unique perspective on an ordinary part of life.

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. Avoid politics
    • 3.1) NEW RULE as of 5 Nov 2024, trying it out
    • 3.2) Political posts often end up being circle jerks (not offering unique perspective) or enflaming (too much work for mods).
    • 3.3) Try c/politicaldiscussion, volunteer as a mod here, or start your own community.
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mumblerfish@lemmy.world 45 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

This isn't a court of justice, son

this is a court of law

[–] MissJinx@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Tbf nowdays you're lucky if you get to court. Some are just gunned down

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 24 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Justice is blind. What you're seeing isn't actually justice.

[–] scytale@lemm.ee 24 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The blindfold on lady justice has a rich-people filter.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 13 points 3 months ago

That's why she has a scale on one hand, so she can tell which side put more money

[–] johannesvanderwhales@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago

Aspirational talk isn't a bad thing.

[–] j4k3@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Justice is blind.

Ideality is not reality though, it is a somewhat useful abstraction, about like any of the sciences; where there is always a scope of application and limitation in the entropy of reality.

The terminology of a Justice system is the primary fallacy. It is a legal system and legislative governance. These are not equivalent. Even the concept of justice is extremely subjective to many factors and perspectives.

[–] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

If justice isn't blind, why do we all know what it should be? Because our legal system is the manifestation of justice in our authority structure, and it isn't doing a good job of living up to the objective principles of justice.

The problem isn't the ideas of justice, the problem is the judicial branch of government.

[–] blaue_Fledermaus@mstdn.io 6 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Does anyone think it's reality? It's an unreachable ideal to be continuously worked towards.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 5 points 3 months ago

Or against, depending on your cultural values.

[–] masquenox@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It’s an unreachable ideal to be continuously worked towards.

No it isn't. It's a pretense that the class who controls the violent apparatus of the state is impartial. It's propaganda and nothing else.

[–] blaue_Fledermaus@mstdn.io 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

It's an ideal in that people should be working towards taking control of the state apparatus and making it so. The class struggle will always make it impossible to reach, but it can always be pushed to be better.

[–] masquenox@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It’s an ideal in that people should be working towards taking control of the state apparatus

People are ALREADY in control of the state apparatus. What we have is, by now, the very predictable result.

[–] blaue_Fledermaus@mstdn.io 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Well, beyond that the alternative is to abolish the state, which I'm not against, but the ideal would remain.

[–] masquenox@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

There is no such thing as "blind" justice. What they mean with "blind justice" isn't justice at all, but rather a blind application of and obedience to law - which liberalism have always (and utterly falsely) conflated with "justice."

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

It never has been, and if it ever were we wouldn't have needed all those statues of the chick with the scales and the blindfold as propaganda.

[–] Lexam@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 months ago

It is blind to the suffering of the poor.

[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Not much of a shower thought.

Your complaint is that the world isn't perfect.

[–] lord_ryvan@ttrpg.network 1 points 3 months ago

Also, it's a very vague and loaded comment. This really feels like it shouldn't be here.

[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

The american legal system isn't about justice

[–] masquenox@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

The american legal system isn’t about justice

None of them are. They are all about maintaning the status quo and nothing else.

[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

The lady justice monologue from V for Vendetta by Alan Moore seems appropriate:

' Hello, dear lady. A lovely evening, is it not?

Forgive me for intruding. Perhaps you were intending to take a stroll. Perhaps you were merely enjoying the view.

No matter. I thought that it was time we had a little chat, you and I.

Ahh…I was forgetting that we are not properly introduced.

I do not have a name. You can call me V.

Madam Justice…this is V.

V…this is Madam Justice.

Hello, Madam Justice.

“Good evening, V.”

There. Now we know each other. Actually, I’ve been a fan of yours for quite some time. Oh, I know what you’re thinking…

“The poor boy has a crush on me…an adolescent infatuation.”

I beg your pardon, Madam. It isn’t like that at all.

I’ve long admired you…albeit only from a distance. I used to stare at you from the streets below when I was a child.

I’d say, to my father, “Who is that lady?” and he’d say, “That’s Madam Justice.” And I’d say, “Isn’t she pretty.”

Please don’t think it was merely physical. I know you’re not that sort of girl. No, I loved you as a person. As an ideal.

That was a long time ago. I’m afraid there’s someone else now…

“What? V! For shame! You have betrayed me for some harlot, some vain and pouting hussy with painted lips and a knowing smile!”

I, Madam? I beg to differ! It was your infidelity that drove me to her arms!

Ah-ha! That surprised you, didn’t it? You thought I didn’t know about your little fling. But I do. I know everything!

Frankly, I wasn’t surprised when I found out. You always did have an eye for a man in uniform.

“Uniform? Why, I’m sure I don’t know what you’re talking about. It was always you, V. You were the only one…”

Liar! Slut! Whore! Deny that you let him have his way with you, him with his armbands and jackboots!

Well? Cat got your tongue?

Very well. So you stand revealed at last. You are no longer my Justice. You are his Justice now. You have bedded another.

Well, two can play at that game!

“Sob! Choke! Wh-who is she, V? What is her name?”

Her name is Anarchy. And she has taught me more as a mistress than you ever did!

She has taught me that justice is meaningless without freedom. She is honest. She makes no promises and breaks none. Unlike you, Jezebel.

I used to wonder why you could never look me in the eye. Now I know.

So goodbye, dear lady. I would be saddened by our parting even now, save that you are no longer the woman that I once loved.

Here is a final gift. I leave it at your feet.

The flames of freedom. How lovely. How just. Ahh, my precious Anarchy…

“O beauty, ’til now I never knew thee.” '

[–] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

What tipped you off?

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago
[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Does anyone actually think it is? That's the ideal, it's supposed to be aspirational.

[–] masquenox@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

That’s the ideal, it’s supposed to be aspirational.

It was never an ideal. It was little more than a marketing gimmick.