this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2024
393 points (98.5% liked)

News

23301 readers
3728 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world 121 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Thank fucking god. Cannot afford to lose any more good progressives like her.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 59 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, losing Cori Bush sucked. She singlehandedly forced Biden to extend the eviction moratorium, just because of her own life experience.

[–] raynethackery@lemmy.world 20 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Can't she run as an independent?

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago (2 children)

She really shouldn't, though. In our FPTP system without ranked-choice voting, that unfortunately means that instead of her or the candidate AIPAC corruptly funneled in millions to boot her out, a Republican could take the position instead, and we really can't afford that in the House this race.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

In our FPTP system without ranked-choice voting, that unfortunately means that instead of her or the candidate AIPAC corruptly funneled in millions to boot her out, a Republican could take the position instead

That's how it works with presidential elections and others where the party nominees are the ones with the most support.

AIPAC buying the primary notwithstanding, she would be by far the best known and most popular candidate to run and being cheated by a genocide apologia factory and their handpicked empty shell candidate is an excellent additional narrative to run on in addition to her stellar work in Congress.

[–] Bumblefumble@lemm.ee 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If she couldn't win the primary, how can she win the general? Not like AIPAC will just stop influencing the election.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

People were caught off guard. It's extremely liked that most of the people swayed by the smears AIPAC paid for didn't know that the deceptively named United Democracy Project was actually hidden foreign election meddling.

It's much more likely that people know now and I don't know about you, but I'd be pissed off if I was them.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Fuck that. A Democrat that votes against democratic policies; another Joe Manchin or Kirsten Sinema is worth less than the dirt on my boots.

And if that means running as an independent to beat a democrat, so be it. I'm not here to support a team.

I think she should absolutely run as an independent. AIPAC candidates are basically fascists.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 11 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

She could, don't know if she will or has a shot.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

She'd probably be the favorite. A lot of people probably didn't know that they were being gaslighted or even that AIPAC was the source and are rightly pissed off about it.

Whether she will run, though, I have no idea.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I think you're really overestimating the Palestine issue on the general voting population. She made some other major mistakes that hurt her in the primary. Coming out so strongly against the infrastructure bill that has been such an immediate positive impact in so many people's lives for instance.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Coming out so strongly against the infrastructure bill that has been such an immediate positive impact in so many people's lives for instance.

She voted against it because the good parts didn't gi anywhere near far enough, the bad parts such as mass privatization of critical infrastructure went too far, and the DNC leadership split the best parts off into a separate bill that they then let die, in spite of explicitly promising not to.

It's nowhere near as good as it's made out to be by neoliberals, the billionaire-owned media, and other loyalists to the party leadership, and she was right to withdraw her support after they broke that promise and doomed the parts she was championing.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah I've heard her arguments, it's just that voters don't appreciate those arguments clearly. They've made that loud and clear to her in particular. Most voters would prefer to take one step forward than standing still. They prefer a little good to a hypothetical perfect. They would rather politicians do things that help them and their community right now. So when you go out against a bill that people can see tangible effects from, people who are desperate for something anything to help them, you've kind of missed the point of Public Service. It's a lesson some progressives never seem to learn. Progressive change is made, just as the word implies, progressively. Step by step by step. You can't make things better if you never start making things better.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago

Most voters would prefer to take one step forward than standing still. They prefer a little good to a hypothetical perfect

If only! That bill was very much half a step forward, three steps back when it came to both infrastructure and climate change.

They would rather politicians do things that help them and their community right now

That's not the net effect though. The parts nobody talks about, such as the privatization of critical infrastructure and increasing fossil fuel leases many times over harm a lot more than the things constantly promoted help.

So when you go out against a bill that people can see tangible effects from,

Which included a lot more bad things that they weren't told about by the party and the billionaire-owned media. Even the far right echo chamber didn't talk about those things because they considers them good and didn't want to give the Dems any credit.

people who are desperate for something anything to help them

People who are being lied to by both omission and exaggeration

you've kind of missed the point of Public Service.

On the contrary. Cori Bush was honest about what was in the bill, what wasn't, and why she voted against it.

The DNC leadership and the media, on the other hand, gaslighted people into supporting something that wasn't what they told people. As is almost always the case, the bill has the net effect of helping people a little bit while harming them a lot to enrich the owner donors.

That's not public service. That's lies and corruption.

You can't make things better if you never start making things better.

You also can't make things better by making things worse and then lying about it.

The bill gives crumbs to regular people and climate change mitigation in exchange for entire loaves for exploitative private industry including the fossil fuel industries.

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 10 points 3 months ago

same here; hearing about all of the people who have been displaced by aipac was starting to make me thing that money was the end all and be all of our world.

[–] HuntressHimbo@lemm.ee 61 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Glad AIPAC couldn't purchase this one at least

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

I mean, they weren’t going to get far with $25

She didn’t have to fight AIPAC money.

[–] oakey66@lemmy.world 43 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Fuck yes. Fuck you AIPAC.

So now.. does Harris move on Gaza?

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

AIPAC basically of stayed out of this race. They’ve been picking races with tight polling, then throwing down in those.

[–] PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 months ago
[–] Quill7513 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Suck it, AIPAC! Maybe we can start getting money out of politics now that more and more people are alert to all the bullshit in the world

[–] rbesfe@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 months ago

Please do some research before boasting about beating a $25 campaign donation

[–] Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)
[–] Tja@programming.dev -1 points 3 months ago

Journalism costs money.

[–] fubarx@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 months ago

Omar campaigned with Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) toward the end as liberals looked for a decisive win after their recent electoral setbacks. Sanders said at a Minneapolis rally that he wanted to ensure Omar “wins and, in fact, wins big.”

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Reminder, she was running against a candidate that AIPAC did -not- invest in.

Well, not a lot anyway. They did spend $25.