this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2024
290 points (95.9% liked)

politics

19096 readers
3485 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 80 points 3 months ago (7 children)

She has had good turnout in events but don't let that fucking fool you. Florida is mostly republican but not like 90% - you can find plenty of die hard liberals in the state.

I'm not saying it's impossible but don't hold your fucking breath.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 42 points 3 months ago (3 children)

We voted for Obama, twice. Florida is more purple than most believe.

[–] NewNewAccount@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I feel like this has changed a lot in the last 12 years. Florida was a battleground state but many conservatives flocked there after the state and Scott and DeSantis leaned into the whole “freedom” thing.

[–] Zipitydew@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 months ago

Boomer retirements started hitting hard in 2011. Florida is approaching 1/3 of the state being older than 60. They're the most rapidly aging state in the country right now. Nearly every other state is losing old people to Florida on a daily basis.

When Obama was running, Florida was less than 1/4 of the state being 60 or older. Somewhere just under 4M residents of around 19M total. Now Florida has 22M people and of that 7M are 60 or older. The biggest growth changes are in the 0-19 age group that can't/won't vote. And the 60+ age group which is guaranteed to vote and skews conservative.

[–] GroundedGator@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yep. Live in Florida, family in Illinois. Conservative family members in Illinois love to point out I at least have more freedom than they do in Illinois.

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Except they have recreational weed.

[–] GroundedGator@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Yes, but these are also lifetime NRA members and you can't use illegal drugs and get your FOID card. Have a few people who still have dealers and won't go to dispensaries because of this.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

The main beef with Florida is that the Democrats are just not well organized. As a campaign you can take a risk to invest in a purplish state if there’s a good team on the ground to help you (looking at Georgia for instance). If the organisation is not there, it’s just too risky.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

Well, it's kind of hard to believe because of the absolutely insane people you keep voting into office somehow.

[–] finley@lemm.ee 25 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (4 children)

As a diehard leftie who is unfortunately stuck in Florida for this election season, I will absolutely be voting for Kamala.

Kamala Kamala, Kamala, Kamala Kamala!

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 15 points 3 months ago

Worst case, Harris doing well forces Trump to spend more money there. I'm pretty sure his ego would take a big hit losing Florida, so I hope that effects it too and he overspends.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Mmmmm, lets see if this hurricane season changes that.

I can tell you Ian opened some eyes in my area. They're very interested in the gulf water temp charts I've sent them now.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Yeah, I feel like people had this idea of rising sea levels looking like a bathtub filling.

No. This is the ocean. It's going to look like Ian and Katrina, and sometimes it won't give back.

[–] RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

50% of those republic voters found out that SCOTUS intends for them to make babies, fetch sandwiches, and shut up about their opinions.

The percentage of women who are cool with that is vanishingly small.

I wouldn’t be so sure.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 22 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I think you'll depressingly find the number of women who are okay with it is surprisingly large - the GOP is basically embracing tradwife bullshit at this point and it seems to still get the majority of conservative women.

[–] Fern@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

I agree. There are also more and more younger voters. Not saying they are all going to vote blue, but far more of them are.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] joyjoy@lemm.ee 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

But what's the voter turnout like? My brother lives in Florida and he proudly doesn't vote.

[–] Atom@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Allegedly 77% in 2020 according to the FL government. I assume that's among registered voters though, not all eligible.

https://dos.fl.gov/elections/data-statistics/elections-data/voter-turnout/

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 4 points 3 months ago

Yeah, I hope she doesn't pull a Hillary and dump a bunch money into Florida and Texas instead of campaigning in actual swing states.

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 34 points 3 months ago

Note, even if she is unlikely to win the state, she could force them to campaign there a little and divest resources from places that are leaning blue. Nobody wants to take a "safe" state for granted after 2016.

[–] DirkMcCallahan@lemmy.world 19 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I get the idea of forcing Trump to waste resources in Florida, but really, the state has just been getting redder, and we don't want to repeat the Hillary playbook.

Shore up support in the actual battleground states and the weaker "lean Dem" states (e.g., New Hampshire). 270 is all you need.

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@kbin.run 13 points 3 months ago

Did you see the article about Kamala Harris at The Villages? She got a good response. And no state is pure red nor pure blue. People change.

[–] d00phy@lemmy.world 19 points 3 months ago (1 children)

So, if he loses Florida will he have to move again? Somewhere in the Midwest, maybe? Texas (until enough Democrats move there to turn it blue)?

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

Moscow, probably

[–] EvilEyedPanda@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago

Warning? How about a beacon of hope!

[–] Raglesnarf@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago

she's got my vote

[–] ristoril_zip@lemmy.zip 16 points 3 months ago

Yes he could lose Florida! Meatball Ron won his first term like 50.5% to 49.5%. Florida is a swing state, but Democrats are so dysfunctional statewide that they can't organize a two person picnic.

I think that's changing with the March For Our Lives kids coming of age.

The Harris campaign needs to take all this money they're getting and invest it in states Biden got 45% or higher in 2020. They can get those states.

[–] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 15 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Hope so, but he is up +7 in the poll in the article.

[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It's pretty wild to look at a +7 polling lead as a potential loss.

That's like, Texas margins.

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

That's really not that wild considering recent special elections Dems winning by a large margin when it was expected to be close, or even go the other way. Polls have been skewing more red than reality for quite a while now.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

florida hates democrats but they love the policies. Imo, campaigning in florida should be about improving medicaid and medicare, reducing administrative costs etc.

I think Harris is the kind of wine mom that appeals there but democrats are a tough sell there.

[–] cordlesslamp@lemmy.today 12 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I'm not American so I'm a little confused.

If "polls" is surveys from individuals, but the popular vote doesn't matter, then what's the point of these headlines anyway?

[–] ProfessorScience@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago (2 children)

The winner of the popular vote within the state wins the state's electoral votes. And Florida has a sizeable number of electrical votes.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago (5 children)

its so weird that we have a difficult to understand electoral college system and yet one of the common arguments against ranked choice and party list voting is "its too hard to understand"

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] netvor@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

electrical votes

you mean eclectic votes?

[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

FL has 30 EC votes so a statewide poll on their opinions is pretty important. Having said that, we don't know for sure whether or not the poll is accurate or indicative of the opinions of the people who will actually vote.

[–] Snowclone@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Every state gets a number of Electoral College votes, that's a fixed number. And each state is winner take all, the popular vote doesn't matter because every vote past 51% of a state's election numbers is wasted. California has the highest population of US citizens, it generally is very liberal and Democrats win pretty often. From a local perspective, the GOP haven't had significant votes after they started using very racist rhetoric about Hispanics, and it's hard to find anyone in CA who isn't Hispanic, Or the spouse of a Hispanic person, or the in-law, or just friends with all those same people, so it really ruined their numbers out here. So with the majority of the country living in this state, everything after 51% of our total vote numbers is ignored, those millions of votes don't counter the very few votes coming out of Indiana, or Ohio, or Wisconsin. Our effective votes are a percentile below 1, low pop states have effective votes well above 1.

But, it still always matters how many people are voting up to that 51% mark, if the survey projects Harris at or above those numbers she'll get all their EC votes, so that's why the survey matters, it's also how the candidates decide how to spend money, Harris won't put $5mil into Idaho, they aren't even close to voting Democrat and it's one of the most openly racist states in the US the chance they would change their mind is very slim, so, they won't waste the money there. In the end, it always comes down to how much money they raised, and how well they spent it.

[–] cordlesslamp@lemmy.today 2 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Isn't it make more sense to spend more money where you're behind?

Like, if you're so sure you would win at Cali anyway then why even try anymore? On the other hand, you might want to spend extra time and money in places like Idaho to convince and convert more people to vote for you?

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You want to spend money in states that could go either way. Swing states they're called. There's no real point in spending a ton of money in a place you can't possibly win, either. Idaho would be a waste of money.

[–] cordlesslamp@lemmy.today 5 points 3 months ago (2 children)

ah yes, swing states, that makes much more sense. thanks.

one more question if it's not too much trouble. Is it mandatory for a president candidate to do a campaign in every single state? Or just the one they feel like it?

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

No, it's not mandatory at all. That being said all states generally get a bare minimum (radio/tv ads) from local groups or pacs, but not generally the visits with crowds and all that. This was one of the issues that people had with Hillary's campaign is that she only visited certain states, and completely ignored too many swing states that easily could have gone her way.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

I put this out last week. I was looking at the maps from 2012, 16, and 20, and then looking at the 2020 census product.

Since its not my day job I can't prioritize the analysis I want to do, but at least in the aggregate, the demographics are there for a blue victory. If I can get around to it, I'll post my results when I have them.

[–] verdantbanana@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago (2 children)

if only the people not allowed to vote in Florida could vote

doubt the US would be red or blue if everyone here could vote

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

It would be cool. It would absolutely turn the race on its head. Florida has 30 EC votes these days.

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 7 points 3 months ago

The polls are STILL a bunch of shit

I’m happy the D line is going up, but the truth is, nobody knows what’s gonna happen.

[–] jprice@kbin.run 7 points 3 months ago

Nobody likes republicans in south Florida except for the few weirdos and fucking losers.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

Oh, how I would looooove to donnie lose Florida. That would be {chef's kiss}.

[–] randon31415@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

The abortion and marijuana ballot measures are on the Florida ballot. They need 60% to pass. If abortion gets 60% of the vote, what are the odds that Harris gets 50%?

load more comments
view more: next ›