this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2024
83 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37705 readers
336 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 47 points 5 months ago

You opt out by simply never giving them any of your data.

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@kbin.run 41 points 5 months ago

Opting out is easy. Come to Pixelfed, they sure as hell aren't IG.

https://pixelfed.org/servers

[–] darklamer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 5 months ago

“These features and experiences need to be trained on information that reflects the diverse cultures and languages of the European communities who will use them.”

No, they do not, these features and experiences don't need to exist at all.

[–] frog@beehaw.org 18 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

UK citizens can also opt out, as the Data Protection Act 2018 is the UK's implementation of GDPR and confers all of the same rights.

In my opt out, I have also reminded them of their obligation to delete data when I do not consent to its use, so since I have denied consent, any of my data that has been used must be scrubbed from the training sets and resulting AI outputs derived from the unauthorised use of my data.

Sadly, having an Instagram account is unavoidable for me. Networking is an important part of many creatives' careers, and if the bulk of your connections are on Instagram, you have to be there too.

[–] Thalestr@beehaw.org 5 points 5 months ago

Forgive me for the pessimism, but I sincerely doubt that they honour any opt-outs. Meta has shown time and time again that they'd rather just pay fines as business expenses instead of abiding by law(s).

[–] stardust@lemmy.ca 17 points 5 months ago

Social media that requires an account to view stuff aren't worth even visiting.

[–] Ilandar@aussie.zone 11 points 5 months ago

rEdDiT iS uP iN aRmS

Did anyone else click through to the supposed evidence of this? It's a thread with like 40 karma and 30 comments lol

[–] tal@lemmy.today 10 points 5 months ago

I don't have an Instagram account.

I mean, I guess maybe someone could take a picture of me and upload it to Instagram and label it or something. And it's possible to infer that two people are associated by having a picture containing both them that you run facial recognition or something on. I guess you could kind of think of that as being "my data" in an indirect sense.

[–] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 5 points 5 months ago

Talk about begging the question. Block all Meta domains at the router level, and ... uh ... don't have an account.