this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2024
891 points (99.1% liked)

Funny: Home of the Haha

5641 readers
635 users here now

Welcome to /c/funny, a place for all your humorous and amusing content.

Looking for mods! Send an application to Stamets!

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.


Other Communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 60 points 6 months ago (5 children)

Is he though? Sure, he's great in his roles, but his mannerisms and personality pretty much stay the same regardless of the role. Someone like Gary Oldman, or Ed Norton are far better actors IMO. They disappear into their roles.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 32 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I think these two particular roles had a lot of mannerism overlap. That, and it was the same director in a similarly genred historical fiction revenge thriller. In Alita: Battle Angel and Downsizing, he's playing different roles. Its just a shame the material doesn't hold up to his talent for the roles.

But I'll also note that Gary Oldman, in particular, really goes ham with the physical transformation. From slick terrorist in Air Force One to manic ex-con in Harry Potter to... Jesus Christ look at all those facial prostheses in Darkest Hour, its not just the acting but the degree to which he's willing to physically change himself to fit the part.

Matthew McConaughey and Christian Bale pull this as well, to really intense effect.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Christian Bale is definitely committed to his transformations. A lot of times I still see him in his roles, but he thoroughly sold me on his method acting ability in The Big Short. Holy shit, man! That was like watching a completely different person on the screen.

[–] MBM@lemmings.world 10 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I saw Christian Bale and transformation and I was convinced you were going to bring up The Machinist, he lost a lot of weight for that role.

Image

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

Yeah that is one of the examples of him being incredibly committed to his transformations. But I felt that The Big Short really made him stand out as an actor, since the character has such a completely different personality than all of his other characters, and he totally nails it, even with the little quirks.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

After that role he bulked up to play Bruce Wayne then had to lose weight again because he bulked up too much.

[–] aStonedSanta@lemm.ee 6 points 6 months ago

Yeah Christian Bale in the Machinist is something else.

[–] JayObey711@lemmy.world 25 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Both his most famous roles have a similar way of speaking because the roles are pretty much the same. The efficient and precise German. The genre is also the same. I've seen a german comedy of his where he is completely different.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

What's that one called? I'd like to see it.

[–] JayObey711@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Gott des Gemetzels. It's pretty good, but the type of movie we had to watch in German class.

[–] Strawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I'm only seeing that its original language was English. Did you watch it dubbed in your class?

[–] JayObey711@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

No way. It actually was filmed in English. I did not notice. Walz dubs his own stuff himself. I do faintly remember the movie taking place in France although the actual location was never mentioned I think.

[–] Gloomy@mander.xyz 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It plays in NYC.

One of my favourite movies of all time.

[–] JayObey711@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Wait what. Ok I'm done. I'm going to delete my account I can't recover from this. The movie seemed good tho and my point still stands. Christoph Walz does not play the German stereotype and his performance is different from his stereotypical German roles.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Thank you! I'll check it out.

[–] SeabassDan@lemmy.world 20 points 6 months ago

I think it's more his expressions, like the tiny details that make you feel like he's really the person he's playing on the screen. Regardless of makeup or physical change, this is noticeable in how Tarantino told him to hold back during rehearsals to really bring out his costars' reactions in the final take of various scenes. That has nothing to do with what the character is or what he's wearing or his physical condition.

[–] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I didn't even know Gary Oldman was both Sirius Black and Commissioner Gordon until like 5 years after those movies came out.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 14 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Go see his other roles. Zorg, for instance.

[–] dsco@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Jean Baptiste. Emmanuel. Zorg.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

CORBINDALLASMOOLTYPASS!

[–] dessimbelackis@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

I’ll tell you what I do like though: a killer, a dyed-in-the-wool killer.

[–] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

How many movies have you seen him in to make a fair comparison?

His best known roles are very similar, true, but there's more to being a great actor than just having a lot of range.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Only 3 so far. Basterds, the Django one, and Alita. I feel like I've probably seen him elsewhere in smaller roles, but I can't name one, so I'll stick with three.