this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2024
286 points (94.7% liked)

News

23305 readers
4267 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Research says involuntary celibate men make "fundamental errors" about what women want in a partner.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] agitatedpotato@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago (1 children)

No but it can absolutely be a trauma response.

[–] yesman@lemmy.world -3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

trauma response

What trauma? listening to Jordan Peterson? If being rejected makes you hate women, then you were an entitled asshole to begin with. Nobody is owed affection, companionship, or romance.

This attitude is an insult to lonely ~~men~~ people everywhere, who everyday cope with romantic failure without regressing into a chud. Incels are deplorable people; fuck 'em.

[–] agitatedpotato@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (4 children)

Sigh. Just say you don't know shit about mental health and move on with your performative outrage for any time you hear the word incel. I don't have time to teach an idiot about trauma informed perspectives and it's clear you're not looking to learn anything, so I'm going to ask you to shut up and listen to the mental health professionals, like the one's in the article who did the study. Because your little rage fit over incels is NOT more informed than studies conducted by professionals, and in fact is much more regressive so congrats for a perspective that make the problem you pretend to care about worse. Must feel nice to teach those incels a lesson though I'm sure you showed them.

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Performative outrage is Lemmy's kink

[–] agitatedpotato@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

For real, like damn, if you want there to be less incels, well we gotta fix it, and unless their personal solution is to just round em up and throw em in camps, then maybe we have to listen to the people who spent time studying this. Shocking. I swear they just wanna feel mad and superior.

[–] shiroininja@lemmy.world -2 points 9 months ago (3 children)

it's on them to fix themselves. not society. I'm alone, divorced, but I still don't blame women or society. that's the incel's problem: lack of personal accountability, entitlement to a woman, society blaming.

it takes two to make a relationship, and I'm tired of my fellow man being offended at having to work at having a relationship

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

So in one, direct, uninterrupted, comment chain we went from

No but it can absolutely be a trauma response.

to

it’s on them to fix themselves.

Geez lemmy.

[–] shiroininja@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Mental illness isn't your fault, but it's your responsibility.

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Ah I see and because it's their responsibility they shall not have any help dealing with it. This just in: Having ADHD is your responsibility, therefore, no Aderall for anyone.

Them being incels is also not the fault of the medical system, but it's still the medical system's responsibility to help incels to develop responsibility. It is the fault of society at large that incels are incels -- noone is born one -- so it's even more the responsibility of society at large to help them get rid of that bullshit. Both for the incel's and society's sake. Or are you yourself too alienated from everything, too atomised, to recognise that? Well by your own logic that'd be your responsibility to fix, no need for me to even mention it you can do it on your own.

[–] shiroininja@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

wow, you're greatly misunderstanding what I said. I said it's their responsibility to seek help, get meds, get therapy, and actually take their meds. You can't force someone to better themselves. you will always fail unless they put in effort. And with incels, most I've met don't see anything wrong with their thinking, so they won't seek help.

I've had to put in a lot of work to manage my mental illness. It is my and only my responsibility to make sure I take my meds everyday and to maintain healthy habits that keep my mind functioning properly. Nobody can physically do that for me. Education on better choices? sure. but actually do the work to not be a shithead, that's on me. It's like getting sober. It's a lot of work, and you have to put in effort. It won't happen for you, no matter how many treatment centers you go to.

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

No I understood you just fine. If that's how you wanted to be understood from the start you should have started out with saying what you did say now and not condense it down to

it’s on them to fix themselves. not society.

We've all heard the "personal responsibility" spiel so often usually it means "fuck you got mine". And it's not like you're saying anything new on the accepting therapy side -- that goes without saying when we're talking that there should be therapy. Then, there's indeed ways to coax people into accepting help, I've been talking about that with others elsewhere in the thread, meanwhile you're standing there bogging it down to "it's on them". No. Not good enough. That's an excuse, an excuse to later on throw up your hands and say "well they couldn't be helped", you know, the exact opposite of taking responsibility. "We've tried nothing and are all out of ideas".

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

it's on them to fix themselves. not society

How's that working out for society?

[–] shiroininja@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

you can't force change in another's mind. They have to be willing.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

And help should be available for those who are, since that would benefit society.

[–] shiroininja@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

of course, what I mean is it's up to them to seek it. Make it available, but it will forever be their responsibility to come to the couch.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world -3 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

incels keep shooting up schools, reason enough for me to dislike them.

[–] agitatedpotato@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

So don't you want to take steps to stop that or do you want to ignore it and just hope schools stop getting shot up?

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world -4 points 9 months ago

I didn't say that, I said I dislike them. Just as I dislike idiots like you who jump to the dumbest conclusions automatically.

[–] totallynotarobot@lemmy.world -2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

This is a really gross and condescending take. Outrage over incels isn't performative, and if you think so you're either stupid or a psychopath. Just because you don't personally face threats of bodily harm doesn't mean it isn't real.

Go outside.

[–] agitatedpotato@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Whats gross and condescending is looking at people who need mental help then saying "no they dont" simply because you don't like them. You're a moron who wants to feel better than another group of people and can't see past your own dislike to actually solve a damn problem. If you don't want it to be solved just say so. Just say "id rather do nothing an keep watching schools get shot up so I can look down on a group". Your beliefs sound a lot more like a psychopath than beliefs that try to make it so incels dont exist anymore. So I repeat, you're a moron.

Also if you're outrage demands no solutions but to ignore the problem, then it's exactly performative, because you don't want to change anything, you just want to yell. Tell me whats more performative then outrage with no change?

[–] totallynotarobot@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

That was completely incoherent and makes a hell of a lot of assumptions. I didn't say half of what you're crediting me with.

You're unproductive. And not even addressing what my actual comment was about.