sorted by: new top controversial old
[-] barsoap@lemm.ee 3 points 16 minutes ago* (last edited 14 minutes ago)

Anglos like to talk about things like "Number 5", "Westminster", "Whitehall", "The White House", etc, maybe it's from there.

And while in Germany we wouldn't ever refer to the President or their office as anything but "The President", the residence is definitely Bellevue Palace. As in "The President received guest at " will never be filled in with "their office". If you said "the office" people might think it's the boring building in the front with all their staff.

Taiwan's presidential office not having a proper name (that I know of) Algo journalists then feel a strong urge to describe it, I'd say. And it's indeed notable.

[-] barsoap@lemm.ee 1 points 34 minutes ago

Depends, I'd say. Is your set theory incomplete or inconsistent?

[-] barsoap@lemm.ee 0 points 39 minutes ago

You can, in fact, go to Starbucks and order an Espresso. Let's just say that it tastes as if the barrista had never drank one straight.

[-] barsoap@lemm.ee 0 points 45 minutes ago* (last edited 44 minutes ago)

Americans found lots of values in Starbucks coffee because Americans have no concept of coffee that's simultaneously black, not bitter, not acidic, and sweet. It would be wrong to blame Starbucks for that, they're a symptom, not the cause, but yes their coffee sucks. As it does everywhere else in the US, the country that thought that percolators were a mighty fine idea.

(And yes I know you guys invented the Aeropress. Good thing, good job, good coffee (with proper beans), now also use it).

[-] barsoap@lemm.ee 1 points 49 minutes ago
[-] barsoap@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

You probably are familiar with the thing, just not under that name, and not as a subject of mathematical study. I am aware that there are, at least in theory, mathematicians never expanding beyond pen+paper (and that's fine) but TBH they're getting kinda rare. The last time you fired up Julia you probably used them, R, possibly, Coq, it'd actually be a surprise.

They're most widely known to trip up newbie programmers, causing excessive bug hunts and then a proud bug report stating "0.1 + 0.2 /= 0.3, that's wrong", to which the reply will be "nope, that's exactly as the spec says". The solution, to people who aren't numerologists, is to sprinkle gratuitous amounts of epsilons everywhere.

[-] barsoap@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

And this is exactly why I always humour tech support when they're asking me which lights exactly are on, which colour, and their blinking patterns. I've already made the diagnosis yes the problem is on their end but it's not like they have a way to know I'm not full of shit.

[-] barsoap@lemm.ee 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It's a wonderful world where 1 / 0 is ∞ and 1 / -0 is -∞, making a lot of high school teachers very very mad. OTOH it's also a very strange world where x = y does not imply 1 / x = 1 / y. But it is, very emphatically, an algebra.

Mostly it's pure numerology, at least from the POV of most of the people using it.

[-] barsoap@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago

IEEE 754

I mean it's an algebra, isn't it? And it definitely was mathematicians who came up with the thing. In the same way that artists didn't come up with the CGI colour palette.

[-] barsoap@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

small module nuclear reactors.

Hmm let's see what changed since I last looked. This study seems recent, just looking at the publicly available sections:

SMRs do not represent dramatic improvements in economics compared to large reactors.

Translation: They're way more expensive than renewables. SMRs have some advantage which are mentioned (less land usage, non-intermittency), then we have

The advanced SMRs are compared to conventional large reactors and natural gas plants,

...but not renewables+storage, which would be a good comparison point. If it looked any good they definitely would've included it.


Now that doesn't mean that these things don't make sense for Microsoft. It might e.g. simplify power distribution within datacentres to a degree that other sources just can't, also reduce or eliminate the need for backup power, etc. But generally speaking I'm still smelling techbro BS.

[-] barsoap@lemm.ee 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

We get it you're vegan.

Also most people are actually lactose-intolerant, the capability to retain production of lactase into adulthood is a mutation won through a lot of hardship and diarrhoea.

Side note Italy being blue explains why they have strange rules such as "no cappuccino after noon", it's not that it's bad or anything it's that many Italians can only stomach one, maybe two a day.

[-] barsoap@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Different kinds of sugar are all sugar when they get to your gut.

Nope fruits are high in fructose while sucrose, aka table sugar, is 50:50 glucose and fructose. Fruit has the same or even worse makeup sugar-wise as HFCS, glucose can be used pretty much directly by the body while fructose needs to be processed by the liver, into fat. Evolutionary speaking that makes a lot of sense as when there's a lot of fruit around it's summer and you need to fatten up.

Real fruit vs. juice is a matter of fibre and satisfaction from chewing, it's way easier to overdrink than to overeat fruit.

67
submitted 5 days ago by barsoap@lemm.ee to c/technology@lemmy.world
85
submitted 1 week ago by barsoap@lemm.ee to c/technology@lemmy.world

A new paper suggests diminishing returns from larger and larger generative AI models. Dr Mike Pound discusses.

The Paper (No "Zero-Shot" Without Exponential Data): https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.04125

46
submitted 1 week ago by barsoap@lemm.ee to c/technology@lemmy.world
14
submitted 1 month ago by barsoap@lemm.ee to c/videos@lemmy.world
7
submitted 1 month ago by barsoap@lemm.ee to c/videos@lemmy.world

There are lots of ways we are tackling the climate crisis, bringing down emissions and sucking carbon out of the atmosphere. But which method is the most cost-effective? For a given investment, which draws down the most carbon emissions? In this video I answer that question... and then talk about why that answer doesn't necessarily mean much.

81
submitted 2 months ago by barsoap@lemm.ee to c/ukraine@sopuli.xyz
110
submitted 2 months ago by barsoap@lemm.ee to c/world@lemmy.world

Press release of the Parliement itself


  • Safeguards on general purpose artificial intelligence
  • Limits on the use of biometric identification systems by law enforcement
  • Bans on social scoring and AI used to manipulate or exploit user vulnerabilities
  • Right of consumers to launch complaints and receive meaningful explanations

On Wednesday, Parliament approved the Artificial Intelligence Act that ensures safety and compliance with fundamental rights, while boosting innovation.

The regulation, agreed in negotiations with member states in December 2023, was endorsed by MEPs with 523 votes in favour, 46 against and 49 abstentions.

It aims to protect fundamental rights, democracy, the rule of law and environmental sustainability from high-risk AI, while boosting innovation and establishing Europe as a leader in the field. The regulation establishes obligations for AI based on its potential risks and level of impact.

[...]

32
submitted 3 months ago by barsoap@lemm.ee to c/ukraine@sopuli.xyz

We interview half a dozen artillerymen, medics, and others, in this exploration of the life of artillerymen in the most intensive artillery war on the planet, the Russian invasion of Ukraine. The interviews are extensive and unfiltered. They cover topics like living on the front, cluster munitions, living underground, the mental health of soldiers, alienation from civilian life, what motivates them to fight, surviving in the winter, what they do for fun, and many more stories.

70
submitted 4 months ago by barsoap@lemm.ee to c/deutschland@feddit.de

Mensch jetzt hab ich schon so viel in den Titel gepackt bleibt ja gar nichts mehr übrig für hier.

12
submitted 4 months ago by barsoap@lemm.ee to c/ukraine@sopuli.xyz

This is a long one, flipping a common understanding of things on its head: Instead of seeing certain things e.g. tankies believe as Russian-caused disinformation (most prominently, colour revolution theory) it traces that stuff back to Lyndon LaRouche and chalks up what Russia is doing to KGB-brains swallowing an American conspiracy theory as truth: It's not that Russia has master-minded some disinformation campaign against the orange revolution, Maidan etc. to justify the invasion, the Siloviki actually believe that shit.

If you ask me that makes a jading amount of sense.

40
submitted 4 months ago by barsoap@lemm.ee to c/science@beehaw.org

In this video, I measure a wave of electricity traveling down a wire, and answer the question - how does electricity know where to go? How does "electricity" "decide" where electrons should be moving in wires, and how long does that process take? Spoiler alert - very fast!

I've been very excited about this project for a while - it was a lot of work to figure out a reliable way to make these measurements, but I've learned SO much by actually watching waves travel down wires, and I hope you do too!

10
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by barsoap@lemm.ee to c/science@beehaw.org

This is from the 37th Chaos Communication Congress, still ongoing y'all might find other things of interests there, e.g. sticking with looking at stars the talk about the Extremely Large Telescope. Congress schedule, live streams, relive and released videos (i.e. final cuts not the automatic relive stuff which is often quite iffy)

Talk blurb:

The Solar System has had 8 planets ever since Pluto was excluded in 2006. This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move. But did you know Neptune was discovered as the 12th planet? Or that, 80 years before Star Trek, astronomers seriously suspected a planet called Vulcan near the Sun? This talk will take you through centuries of struggling with the question: Do you even planet?!

In antiquity, scientists counted the 7 classical planets: the Moon, Mercury, Venus, the Sun, Mars, Jupiter and Saturn – but their model of the universe was wrong. Two thousand years later, a new model was introduced. It was less wrong, and it brought the number of planets down to 6: Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn. Since then, it's been a roller coaster ride of planet discoveries and dismissals.

In this talk, we stagger through the smoke and mirrors of scientific history. We meet old friends like Uranus and Neptune, forgotten lovers like Ceres, Psyche and Eros, fallen celebrities like Pluto, regicidal interlopers like Eris and Makemake as well as mysterious strangers like Vulcan, Planet X and Planet Nine.

Find out how science has been tricked by its own vanity, been hampered by too little (or too much!) imagination, and how human drama can make a soap opera out of a question as simple as: How Many Planets in Our Solar System?

view more: next ›

barsoap

joined 11 months ago