this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2023
327 points (97.1% liked)

Fediverse

28295 readers
508 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/6763330

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/6763328

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/6137607

now users must use VPN for login lemmy.ml

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] redballooon@lemm.ee 97 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

The great misunderstanding of hard left leaning western folks is that neither Russia nor China are socialist or communist.

Just like their hard right leaning counterparts they’re stuck in a mindset from the first half of the past century.

[–] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 61 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

They don't really believe Russia is socialist to any degree, they just support it because it (supposedly) opposes the western hegemony, USA/NATO, etc.

Basically the same logic as that of pro-Russian right-wingers.

[–] wick@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

I had a bunch of hexbear and ml's tell me russian war crimes in Berlin were "Nazi myths". Apparently the Nazis had more influence over the world of historical academia after they lost than Russia.

Also other allied war crimes did happen and weren't Nazi myths.

[–] WaxedWookie@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Supporters of autocratic state capitalist regimes like China and Russia also aren't left-leaning.

[–] redballooon@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Idk, just last week I overheard a report of an old communist whose life wishes were to visit Vietnam, Kuba and Russia.

[–] Klear@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] WaxedWookie@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What part of "authoritarian state capitalism" is left wing to you?

[–] Klear@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't know. I'm not a fucking tankie. They are masters at cognitive dissonance.

[–] WaxedWookie@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If they're definitionally wrong, why call "no true Scotsman"?

[–] lulztard@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

To feel smart. Funnily enough, socialism really has it pretty hard trying to get off the ground. The US coups another nation every five years to install some corrupt dictator that's more than willing to sell out his nation to US interests in exhchange for power. So being hunted down and utterly corrupted by the worlds biggest terrorist nation, calling socialism "never truly tried" is kiiiiiiiiiind of correct. There is a lot of social policies in Europe and those worl pretty well, though US interests and their bootlickers erode those, too.

[–] WhiteHawk@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

They are, they're just ignorant

[–] mnoram@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I think I'm confused. I haven't seen any left leaning people support Russia or China. It's right leaning people that support them. What am I missing? Also I've never seen any left leaning people say Russia and China are actually socialist or communist since the 80s or 90s. I've seen right leaning people claim that lefties believe that but never any examples in real life.

[–] qaz@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Left and right is not a defined group, it’s a name and any group can pretend/think they belong to it.

[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

The most support for China is basic materialist analysis: they've heavily invested in housing, high speed rail, electric car infrastructure, and green energy. Coincidentally: all rather related.

But that is generally the support associated with China: a materialist analysis, usually, if not always, regarding infrastructure.

[–] ninchuka@lemmy.one 3 points 1 year ago

Depends which hard left, I know hard/far left people who hate them