this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2024
98 points (95.4% liked)

Health - Resources and discussion for everything health-related

2323 readers
293 users here now

Health: physical and mental, individual and public.

Discussions, issues, resources, news, everything.

See the pinned post for a long list of other communities dedicated to health or specific diagnoses. The list is continuously updated.

Nothing here shall be taken as medical or any other kind of professional advice.

Commercial advertising is considered spam and not allowed. If you're not sure, contact mods to ask beforehand.

Linked videos without original description context by OP to initiate healthy, constructive discussions will be removed.

Regular rules of lemmy.world apply. Be civil.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

FYI we did this in New Zealand years ago (like more than a decade ago).

It is amazing. There are well ventilated smoking areas (well outside). Inside the air is clear and you get home without reeking of smoke.

[–] CBProjects@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's the same in the UK - indoor public spaces have been smoke free since 2007. This is proposing removing public outdoor smoking spaces at bars and restaurants.

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Oh, that's a bit shit.

Even I, a non smoker, think that's a bit rough.

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

As a former smoker, I think this is a good idea.

Smoking costs the public enormous costs in terms of healthcare.

Like hundreds of thousands of extra per liftime. That the NHS has to pay.

Here’s a study from 1990, add inflation and such https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM199710093371506

[–] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 months ago (2 children)

So do a lot of decisions people make. Where do you draw the line?

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You draw the line proportionally to how dangerous it is. The government regulation dangerous decisions is nothing new.

They put fences around cliffs. They ban driving under drug influence. They regulate driving with driving licenses. They force cars sold to meet certain safety standards. They regulate the max radiation that devices are allowed to output. They tax certain foods more than others (such as sugar-heavy foods). They ban certain construction materials (asbestos, lead).

The list is almost endless.

[–] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

A lot of those things are very different from just personal vices.

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world -2 points 2 months ago

If you want personal vices, sure.

Max sound volume (some people enjoy listening to really loud music). Max road speed (some people enjoy going really fast). Casinos (some people enjoy gambling). Animal fighting (some people enjoy watching those).

Each of those for a variety of reasons

  • Annoyance of others (which could lead to severe health effects)
  • Safety of others
  • Your own wellbeing
  • Animal rights

I don't see why smoking is this special that can't be regulated. It was regulated already.

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Smoking tobacco is far deadlier and more addictive than nearly all drugs. MDMA, LSD, even cocaine.

Only Heroin and Fetanyl are comfortably both more addictive and more deadly.