taanegl

...what do you think ops motives are? What do you think my motives are?

...Jesus would be a socialist, you gimboid. Feeding the poor? Healing the sick? Being against money lending in the temple?!?!

These fascists are fake Christians and follow their anti-christs, like Trump, who want to destroy democracy, empower the billionaire class and rule by way of golden calfs.

Besides, being anti religious is being a bigot - you absolute troglodyte. I hope you stop being anti religious and start going out to touch some grass, inshallah.

Also, I'm an atheist...

I'm just that many steps ahead of you. Light years.

...and I feel fine.

That's so bad... I mean what a waste of money, Americans do that so well themselves.

My brother in Christ, Jesus wouldn't be a democrat, but he would flip furniture at republicans.

Also, most of the world think you're all crazy. What's that measuring unit you use? School shootings per football field? Yeah, that.

Hector... you ever work a day in your bombaclat life?

Why are you booing? Oh yeah, right. Because it's a shallow and superficial take - but still, the boy has a point.

The Dems have been neglecting democratic process within their own ranks, in effect alienating their constituency - and it has been going on long before Palestine hit the mainstream. The last time the Dems held a primary was in 2008.

All of this has culminated in a disenfranchised voter base that just doesn't give af about the dems - and it's well deserved.

I think they will cut some support, but not all of it. The results is that Europe has to step it up, meaning European military industrial complex needs to step up, meaning US companies will lose money... and Donnie boy is all about that scrilla.

Not just that, but a post above this one says how the constituency may have lost their faith in the democrat party and why the elite rhetoric used against democrats sort of has legs to stand on. If it's just a central body that decides the candidate and the constituency has no say, why even care? The choice has been made for you.

TL;Dr. From Wikipedia

IPFS allows users to host and receive content in a manner similar to BitTorrent. As opposed to a centrally located server, IPFS is built around a decentralized system of user-operators who hold a portion of the overall data. Any user in the network can serve a file by its content address, and other peers in the network can find and request that content from any node who has it using a distributed hash table (DHT).

So it's BitTorrent in the web browser... thanks. How is that to be competitive with CloudFlare and Quic again? It has the same network issues that the blockchain has, in that it will be cumbersome and slow - for anyone else that doesn't have millions to throw into infrastructure. Welcome to the same problem again, but in a different way.

The sustainability of it is questionable. If I'm not mistaken, IPFS is based on Ethereum, which has gone over to proof of stake rather than proof of work, but it's still a pretty cumbersome system.

We're talking about something that needs to compete with Quic and CloudFlare. I'm not sure that Ethereum or even crypto itself is efficient enough as a content delivery method, that IPFS - though a nice idea - is unrealistic.

But that's just speculation from someone who has zero knowledge behind IPFS as a technology and protocol, so take it with a grain of salt.

EDIT: honestly, why qualify with "I'm not sure" when besserwissers and their alts roam the fediverse instead of going to therapy. Smh. Give the people a Tl;Dr at least. I'm not here for long form content.

Yankies, I swear to fucking god - don't you fucking dare.