socsa

joined 1 year ago
[–] socsa@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Democratic socialism is also considered left libertarian as well.

[–] socsa@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (5 children)

No, I'm literally quoting a very well known, in depth discussion of the issue from Ethics of Ambiguity

[–] socsa@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (9 children)

It's definitely more complicated than this. A fundamental premise of enlightenment democracy is the establishment of a framework for the mediation of political power without the need for violence. So that ideal of nonviolence goes back much farther than both the US or the fourth estate, and it can be argued that it is actually a starting point for much of the modern world's political philosophy.

But in general, it doesn't take a ton of thought to imagine why cycles of political violence are unsustainable and unproductive. If violence becomes a primary form of political expression, then you will simply have every different group trying their hand. This is why we prescribe the state with a monopoly on violence - a principle even older than democracy.

That isn't to say that violence is never just. Ironically, contemporary existentialism tackles this issue pretty nicely by establishing some imperatives which revolve around the relationship between oppressor and oppressed. Primary among them is the acknowledgement that the most sustainable and desirable form of change is done through conversation with the oppressor (as in liberal democracy), and that anyone who rejects this imperative acts in bad faith, just as the oppressor does when they refuse to treat.

Simply put, to engage in violence is to ordain yourself the oppressor, and understanding the heavy implications of this action is critical to just violence. De Beauvoir argues that idealism is therefore one critical aspect of justice in all forms, as it seeks, by nature, to preserve transcendent humanity in others. And this is the ambiguity of the freedom fighter - the classic dialectical struggle will always reduce itself to mystification because ideals are not fixed like the flesh, against which violence acts. Therefore, while violence can be just, it cannot be justice, because it does not directly serve any ideal. As such, our morality must be "opposed to the totalitarian doctrines which raise up beyond man the mirage of Mankind" and "freedom can only be achieved through the freedom of others."

[–] socsa@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Remember that democracy is not something done to you. It is something you do.

[–] socsa@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Can you elaborate?

[–] socsa@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's actually simpler than that. Conservatism does not actually express any positive philosophy at all. Its premise is entirely reactionary.

[–] socsa@lemmy.ml 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"You'll get more conservative when you start paying taxes."

I have rubbed a bunch of faces in this one as well.

[–] socsa@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Duh, because in the Bible he was crucified for blasphemy so if he ended up crucified for tax evasion the whole story would have fallen apart.

[–] socsa@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Awareness definitely shouldn't produce more active traders, since casual daytrading is almost always suboptimal compared to other casual investing strategies, even before you take time overhead into consideration. I'm sure this has more to do with platform access and the ability to skirt day trading rules by having nearly infinite free accounts.

[–] socsa@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The biggest concern for me is eg, that "zero foreign transaction fees" is considered a perk. I can live without cash back probably, but losing the forex perks would be a nightmare, and would cost me easily a thousand dollars per year.

[–] socsa@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

See if you have a local CERT chapter. They will train you on incident response logistics, search and rescue, and advanced first aid. It will also connect you to a community of volunteers and professionals in the area.

[–] socsa@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I disagree - I have been involved in civilian emergency prep communities for a while now, and it is the formal, published stance of FEMA that having civilians who understand incident response logistics and advanced first aid is absolutely critical to managing the first hours of an incident. We teach advanced trauma first aid (wound packing, field dressing, tourniquets, chest wounds, triage etc), as well as field command hierarchy and management to be handled until professional help arrives.

Teaching civilians how to stabilize, log and report on incidents has a huge multiplier effect on the effectiveness of emergency services. The idea that people should not get involved because they are not professionals is very outdated. It takes about two weeks to go over the basics of incident management, S&R, and first aid/triage. Once you've done that and established a local CERT volunteer corps, FEMA will literally give you grants to hand out equipment, hold practice exercises and recruit more volunteers.

view more: ‹ prev next ›