jsveiga

I like that I don't even care about it. The main user of it is my wife, who is non-technical. It's the only computer she uses, for everything (browsing, shopping, banking, word processing, printing) for 20+ years, and if you ask her which distro it is, well, she doesn't know what "distro" means.

She doesn't "use Linux" because she wanted to "learn Linux" nor to "try this distro". She uses youtube, instagram, the bank site, amazon, libreoffice, etc. The closest she gets to the OS is accepting the package manager prompt to update.

I wish one day most people can answer your question with "I don't know, whatever came with my computer", because it'll mean all of them are as easy to use, as unobtrusive and as unimportant to the user as possible.

But to finally answer it, kubuntu, some ancient, still updatable LTS version (can't even recall when I last upgraded), because it was easier for my wife to adapt, coming from windows 95 when she started using it.

IDK, but it took me a good 30s touching the posts in your screenshot trying to figure out wth was happening.

I agree; I mentioned headless server because that would be a more "pure" and general Linux administration - learning how to administer a SUSE Linux using the graphical yast tool won't translate as well to general Linux admin as if you learn and understand how to fo it in the command line and config files.

And absolutely; one can use Firefox, LibreOffice and any other tool on Linux, but I don't consider that as "learning" or "knowing" Linux. My wife uses exclusively Linux for 20+ years (because when she left her job where they still had Windows 95, that's what the desktop at home ran; kubuntu). She does text editing, internet banking, shopping, browsing, printing, everything there (even updates sw through the gui package manager), but she doesn't "know Linux".

You can setup a Linux system for a computer illiterate, and they may happily learn how to use it for their social media and streaming consuming, and whatever endusers do in their computers, without ever knowing that's "Linux".

Strictly speaking, that already happens. How many Android users know they are running on a Linux kernel?

That's why when OP said "learn Linux", I prioritized the admin on command line; as you don't need to really "learn Linux" to interact with it through automated/graphical admin tools (no shame on doing it, they're sometimes quicker and more practical than command line).

What I mean is that learning how to use cPanel or Yast is useful, but you're learning how to administer as system through a tool, which in theory could even be adapted to administer a non-Linux system.

Maybe a safer option would be to simply be able to add specific users' posts and/or commented posts to your landing page (which could even be implemented in the front end), never collecting or keeping any statistics of how many "followers" people have.

I think it'd be a risky route to take, as it creates the possibility of the general populace electing "lemmy influencers" and ruining it all.

Apart from actual system administration or kernel developing, there's no real "learn Linux" .

Video/Photo/Vector editing on Linux is not "learning Linux", it's learning to use a tool which runs on Linux. You can learn to use Blender, Gimp or Inkscape on Windows. You don't edit videos/photos/vectors with the Linux kernel. You can even "learn the linux terminal" installing bash on Windows.

You can also install Visual Code or IDLE on Windows and on Linux. Learning to code on Visual Code or IDLE is not really "learning Linux".

Also going on distro hopping looking for the "perfect distro" many times means the hopper simply doesn't stick to one long enough to learn how to customize the environment to their liking (which usually means the window manager).

Most of the things you can do on the GUI, even the administration ones are just layers and layers of tools to make things "easier" - and they'll be different on each distro and release. Command line administration will change much less, or at least less frequently.

Things I consider "learning Linux" are for example:

• installing Linux (specially a headless server)

• understanding how to use the package managers - again, on the command line

• understand how systemd works

• (hard core) dive into the kernel workings

• understand how grub works

• learn the general filesystem structure

• learn how to analyze logs

• learn user administration and how the permissions (and extended permissions) work

• learn how to integrate Linux to a Windows environment (join a workgroup or domain, share storage, authenticate users)

• learn how to check resources usage and how to troubleshoot it

• understand the nuances and of partitioning and when they are needed, as well as the different filesystems

• etc (and /etc)

And yes, many of those are not strictly "Linux", but are specific to a Linux system, unlike photo editing.

There are two very distinct categories of content aggregation/social media: The ones where you primarily "follow" people/content creators (facebook, twitter, instagram, youtube, whatsapp) and the ones where you primarily "follow" subjects (reddit, lemmy, slashdot, etc).

The ones that focus on people are much more prone to create opinion bubbles, polarizing groups, and the obnoxious "influencers".

Of course in some cases algorithms (as in youtube) may take in account the subject of your subscribed content creators, and feed you other creators covering similar subjects, but when the focus is on people, chances are they'll feed you similar opinions, not only similar subjects.

It's easy to see the difference if you compare subscribing to a "r/news" channel in reddit/lemmy with subscribing to a "foxnews" channel in youtube/facebook. One of those will get you a wider range of point of views (despite possible mod biases).

So I really hope subscribing or following people never becomes relevant in lemmy, let alone having algorithms tailoring what is shown to me. I want to know other people's opinions; not an echo of my opinions.

Jerboa

This is not any kind of censorship, it's just Reddit forcing people to use their ad-infested app.

It's not normal to be constantly afraid of anything. That's not healthy.

It's normal and advisable not to completely trust the government, but being constantly afraid is paranoid.

I know, I'm Brazilian! It's the largest public health system in the world, and Brazil is not (yet haha) a superpower, so all things considered (and despite all the corruption), they do a pretty good job. In some regions it's even decent, once you survived the lines.

A little context: In Brazil, public free health care is universal. You may be homeless, a legal or illegal immigrant, a tourist, undocumented, never having paid insurance or taxes, but you have the right to use the health care system. As it should be, everywhere.