heeplr

joined 1 year ago
[–] heeplr@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

screw syncterm, what's a good & secure BBS software for linux? with doors and mails and nice menu navigation, zmodem and everything...?

I remember amiexpress and prometheus from amiga times, they were a breeze to setup, configure & maintain.

[–] heeplr@feddit.de 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (13 children)

world-renowned, enterprise-level antivirus software running

lol. better just use defender next time.

edit: or not use windows.

[–] heeplr@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago (5 children)

What are you trying to prevent? You can't release anything (opensource or not) without risking someone stealing the idea without patenting.

No FOSS license will prevent that (quite the opposite, it encourages copying/modifications). Those licenses just prevent someone using your code commercially without releasing the source code again.

[–] heeplr@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago (11 children)

not sure why you think that. if it's indistinguishable, it's still prior art. If it's something better or different than your code, it's a new thing.

Patents protect technical principles, not actual sourcecode.

[–] heeplr@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (13 children)

no, the patent office would find your publication, deem it Prior Art and not grant the patent. If it would miss it (some don't research very well), anyone can notify them to void the patent afterwards anytime.

IANAL, there are lawyers specialized on patents who'll reassure you for free/cheap (relatively, they are friggin expensive). It also depends on legislature. Countries that break/never agreed to the PCT will do what they please.

[–] heeplr@feddit.de 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (15 children)

NAL but my understanding always was, that you can't patent anything in your name, when it's already published.

That would make any patent related clause void anyway.

[–] heeplr@feddit.de 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You could do some automated/scripted installation VM-image builder thingy and release that. Would probably also save some manual work for you. (bash script fetching install image & run qemu, autounattend.xml, etc. all nicely released on github.) And it'd be auditable.

[–] heeplr@feddit.de 30 points 1 year ago (3 children)

that'd be an awesome way to spread malware with some VM evasion.

not sure if any 3rd-party windows install should ever be trusted. no matter what usecase.

[–] heeplr@feddit.de 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

What's surprising? You can basically poke a hole in any living thing and goo will drip out if the hole is large enough.

OP pointed out the fascinating specialty of complete transformation with an intermediate liquid state.

[–] heeplr@feddit.de 61 points 1 year ago (3 children)

much more important: we'd be years ahead with storage technology.

[–] heeplr@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

Secret ballot is not a prerequisite for a democratic process.

What? Of course it is. Hence: "The secret ballot became commonplace for individual citizens in liberal democracies worldwide by the late 20th century.".

The UK has numbered ballots

secret != anonymous ... OPs argument mainly dismissed confidentiality.

But we don't claim their voting process is undemocratic.

we certainly would if no one checked the number of people simultaniously using a voting booth.

I never assumed this.

Sorry, didn't mean to imply that. I meant OPs argument.

[–] heeplr@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
view more: ‹ prev next ›