I've got eight slugs in me. One's lead and the rest are bourbon.
Damn, that's a good line.
I've got eight slugs in me. One's lead and the rest are bourbon.
Damn, that's a good line.
Mountain Goats
The Best Ever Death Metal Band in Denton is a certified banger despite being one of their sillier songs.
By the time that the Ardennes offensive began on 16 December 1944, Kammler received orders from OB West (German Army Command in the West) to begin firing at the end of the month, and the first gun tube was ready for action on 30 December 1944. Two warm-up rounds were initially fired, followed by five high-explosive shells which were fired in sequence, attended by Kammler. The muzzle velocity was approximately 935 metres per second (3,070 ft/s).
The second gun tube was brought into operation on 11 January 1945 and 183 rounds in total were fired until 22 February 1945, with 44 confirmed hits in the urban area. From the 142 rounds that struck Luxembourg, total casualties were 10 dead and 35 wounded.
It seems like the idea was revived for modern railguns, except instead of chemical charges they're electrical.
Per Wikipedia:
The V-3 (German: Vergeltungswaffe 3, ("Vengeance Weapon 3") was a German World War II large-caliber gun working on the multi-charge principle whereby secondary propellant charges are fired to add velocity to a projectile, built in tunnels and permanently aimed at London, England.
The Germans planned to use the weapon to bombard London from two large bunkers in the Pas-de-Calais region of northern France, but they were rendered unusable by Allied bombing raids before completion. Two similar guns were used to bombard Luxembourg from December 1944 to February 1945.
The V-3 was also known as the Hochdruckpumpe ("High Pressure Pump," HDP for short), which was a code name intended to hide the real purpose of the project. It was also known as Fleißiges Lieschen ("Busy Lizzie").
They detail the shelling of Luxembourg in the article.
It's not an accusation.
It's an observation.
And like I said, I'm glad you left. We don't need racist shit bags in our city.
I don't need your life story, I couldn't give less of a fuck.
They were all good observations.
Glad you left.
I've never seen anyone in Dallas look like "a freak with a bone across their nose," but I'm also not a racist piece of shit.
Good thing you don't live here, so you don't get a say.
Those piggy-boots must taste better than they look, and the rest of your unhinged screed isn't even worth talking about.
He can't even do the fandango!
Think there may be the wrong link in this one, saying it's not a gift article.
Thanks for posting all of these, BTW.
If you prefer shallow bodies of fresh water such as lakes, marshes or fish-ponds as breeding sites you might be a red necked grebe.
You realize that paparazzi are shitty bottom feeders, so comparing public policy to the dregs of humanity might not make the point you were attempting?
To answer your question though, the Dallas police have a history of using oppressive tactics from planting cocaine to kettling (exclusively leftist) protesters, so when they pinky-swear that they're going to use this tech responsibility I don't believe them for a second.
All you have to do is look at the other departments using this as a shortcut to actual detective work and arresting the wrong suspect to know how things are going to go; imagine getting arrested and the prosecutor shows a picture of someone who looks kinda like you to a jury. Add in the fact that these tools are inept at identifying POC and it's a recipe for more systemic racism at the hands of the police.