JPAKx4

They overturned the courts previous decision. Technically it wasn't a law before, it just was heavily implied (as in Congress specifically left things vague bc they wanted federal agencies to fill in the blanks in accordance to the Chevron doctrine).

Basically, there wasn't any part that was unconstitutional, they just said the court was overstepping their boundaries when they "created" the Chevron doctrine.

Edit: please read the comment below, it seems like my understanding wasn't quite right

How do I mark this on OSM???

!orphancrushing@lemmy.world

Lossless is impossible, as ~~heat is produced and loses energy~~ engineers will always put blinking LEDs on the batteries

Assuming the article is correct about the slavery, then I would assume the workers don't actually have any choice in whether they relocate or not. I'm not going to pretend I have great evidence, but that's what I would infer.

It doesn't matter the exact reasoning why they moved from a specific area, as long as that reason is caused by sanctions then it's a consequence.

Isn't AOC too young anyway?

!orphancrushing@lemmy.world

I recommend mattbatwings, he actually does design the circuits and just copy and pastes them using world edit tools

I 100% learned that in 7th grade. I'm in a blue county if that helps, but I definitely knew.

o7