FiniteBanjo
No, not perfectly organized invaders, literally any heierarchal group. Because the locals cannot do anything together without consensus. Defence would bw difficult, counter attacking would be impossible or ineffective because the local group would splinter.
Lmao
Insulting Hexbear for actual Fascism is what Fascism is to you?
I want to apologize for my needless aggression earlier. I spent the morning arguing with CCP propogandists and its got me seeing red. (see what I did there?)
Primaries aren't restrictive, its just that nobody actually votes in them. I think the highest turnout in USA history was 36.9 Million people in a primary election, chosen to represent 81 Million DNC Voters and again to represent 329.5 Million Americans total.
There is a huge problem with campaign finance laws in the USA, despite our many laws regulating it, and admittedly not having a democracy would fix that specific problem, but it sure as fuck won't make any American's lives better.
Oh OK Boomer, sorry for using the word Tankie to describe anybody other than a 1948 Hungarian/Bulgarian USSR sympathizer. /s
Yeah, blocked users cannot see or vote on your content.
I assure you that unstable people already stalk others and vote histories are already visible to those who try hard enough.
They can come at me, I downvote every single hexbear post in the feed regardless of content.
Wouldn't that just lead to no action being taken and eventually falling to a system of government, likely invaders, who are capable of taking organized actions?
You know, like every power vacuum ever recorded for all of human history?
If you want to fix things I'm all for it, but lets not pretend that the notion of "Western Democracies" being responsible for their problems has any merit whatsoever.
(Supposedly) Defending their rights in a court of law and participating in fair elections appears as "infighting" to you, lol.