this post was submitted on 27 May 2024
318 points (97.0% liked)

politics

19072 readers
3813 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Drusas@kbin.run 124 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Gotta scrape up cash for those legal fees.

[–] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 35 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Some was found during the hiding of classified docs under the seat cushions.

[–] chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world 18 points 5 months ago

In case of a water landing, these nuclear secrets can be used as a golden parachute.

[–] cultsuperstar@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

Nah, that's what his supporters are for. He'll just sell more limited edition NFTs for $100 a pop and milk them. They're basically a dumb golden goose.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 94 points 5 months ago (2 children)

The plane, a 1997 Cessna jet,

This is NOT the Trump passenger liner with Trump livery on it. That is a Boeing 757 a MUCH larger plane.

[–] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 94 points 5 months ago (5 children)

Oh man, c'mon Boeing, do your thing.

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 74 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The 757 isn't part of the fuckery. The McDonnell-Douglas merger that supposedly doomed Boeing's engineering department (and hundreds of passengers so far) happened in 1997, six years after Trump's plane was built. It's part of the good airplanes Boeing used to make.

[–] sxan@midwest.social 85 points 5 months ago (2 children)

This cannot be emphasized or repeated enough. Before the acquisition, Boeing was led and run by engineers. After the acquisition, MBAs and Finance people were put in charge.

This happens at all large companies, eventually, and it's why they all inevitably shit the bed. It's just in this case, it's killing a lot of people in the process.

[–] solidgrue@lemmy.world 26 points 5 months ago (2 children)

It's the basis of Terry Pratchett's Going Postal novel, a biting send-up of modern corporate kleptocracy.

Also a BBC miniseries.

[–] TheRealKuni@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Gods I love Going Postal. I remember reading it when I was much younger (almost two decades ago) and loving it, but had forgotten enough of it that it almost felt new during my current reread of the Discworld series. Now I’m on Making Money and it’s just as good.

GNU Terry Pratchett

[–] solidgrue@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

May you live as long as your name scintillates in the ether. GNU, brother.

[–] sxan@midwest.social 4 points 5 months ago

Loved that novel; it was one of the first Discworld books I read. And Pratchett had a great way of representing the fundamental truths of governments of whatever structure, except that we should be so lucky to have as brilliant (and, perhaps ironically, benevolent in that he mainly just wants things to function smoothly, despite his Machiavellian ethics) a statesman as The Patrician in charge.

[–] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 9 points 5 months ago (1 children)

People seem to hate the concept of enshittification for some reason, but it's a perfect encapsulation of the modern economy. Things that were once good are abused to extract wealth for shareholders. That is their only purpose. As far as the board of directors at Boeing are concerned, if they narrowly miss an accident they don't have to report and it nets them an additional $1 million, then all the better. High quality engineering, the collaboration of engineers and machinists, and especially safety are only valuable insofar as they make more money. And they'll be damned if they leave any money on the table to avoid a plane breaking up mid-air, killing everybody.

[–] sxan@midwest.social 4 points 5 months ago

People seem to hate the concept of enshittification for some reason

Probably because it makes everything more shitty for everyone but the shareholders. I don't believe that CEO's like knowing that that everybody hates what they're doing: their customers hate them, their employees hate them, and they know it. But I'd they don't satisfy the shareholders, they get fired - just as you say.

The infuriating thing is that it isn't about profit; it's about maximizing profit. Companies can be profitable without enshittification. It's the sin of gluttony that drives profit maximization, and the best thing these people can hope for is that the atheists are right and there is no heaven, because they're for sure going to hell for bald-faced greed.

[–] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 5 months ago

Killing whistleblowers? They're already working on it

[–] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 7 points 5 months ago
[–] simplejack@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

The OG 757s are good shit.

It is the new stuff that you want to avoid.

[–] TheJims@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago
[–] donuts@kbin.social 39 points 5 months ago
[–] Blackout@kbin.run 27 points 5 months ago (2 children)

That was Eric's plane. Now he has to take the bus.

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

A short bus?

[–] bitwolf@lemmy.one 3 points 5 months ago

Oh good maybe more cities will have nice bus systems

[–] ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world 26 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Is that a reasonable price for it?

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 64 points 5 months ago (3 children)

$10 million is the approximate value of the jet; the amount it was sold for wasn't disclosed.

[–] ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world 32 points 5 months ago

Oh, duh. Yes, I should have read the article before asking. Thank you for nicely answering!

[–] AlternatePersonMan@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

He probably sold it for $30 million

Between this stuff and the blatantly inflated Truth Social stock, I would be shocked if there weren't fifty different types of campaign finance violations going on. If you want to launder a donation, this seems like a textbook setup.

[–] GluWu@lemm.ee 15 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I wonder how many children this plane took to Epsteins island for Trump to fuck.

[–] tsonfeir@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

He probably just fucked them in the plane.

[–] mightyfoolish@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago (1 children)

So, how many more jets must be sold before he can pay all of his court mandated fines?

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago (1 children)

One of the less popular lyrics from Mr. Tamborine Man

[–] mPony@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

I think you meant "Blowin' In The Wind", but still, points.

[–] InternetUser2012@midwest.social 9 points 5 months ago

Hahahaha broke bitch had to sell a plane. I wonder how much he owed on it...

[–] hume_lemmy@lemmy.ca 8 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Oh man, I can't imagine the cost to get the smell out of the seats.

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

For a real bargain at only $50 million.... (yes this was likely more money laundering/illegal campaign contributions/bribes)

[–] wildcardology@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

Oh no, not Trump Force One!

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Wouldntve bought it for more than a penny on the dollar