this post was submitted on 26 May 2024
436 points (84.5% liked)

memes

10296 readers
2130 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
436
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by sag@lemm.ee to c/memes@lemmy.world
 

I am feeling that I posted really something offensive. But I just reposted a meme from Reddit that had 12k upvotes. I know I shouldn’t have done that. I don't know if I break any rules or not. If I really break any rules then Mod remove this post.

all 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rotkehle@discuss.tchncs.de 82 points 5 months ago (2 children)

aah the good old sexist memes.

[–] drolex@sopuli.xyz 86 points 5 months ago (2 children)

You see, a woman would have never thought of that simple solution, because her diminutive brain functions are only used for household tasks and cannot adapt to complex problem solving. This is why they shouldn't drive or vote.

[–] Deestan@lemmy.world 34 points 5 months ago

You see: The female and male brains are evolved due to caveman and lizard brain woman gatherers ovulations cause them to emotionally react to preserve other females wellbeing for offspring genes preserve evolve and this is all backed up by (laughably bad) science (from decades ago) and is theorised by top behavioral scientists (debunked lying grifters) today.

Thank you for coming to my TEDx talk.

Buy my book and alpha male enhancement supplements.

[–] poplargrove@lemmy.world 58 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 11 points 5 months ago
[–] cordlesslamp@lemmy.today 49 points 5 months ago (1 children)

If my best friend refused a million dollars to not punch me in the face. He's no longer my best friend.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 2 points 5 months ago

No longer your best friend and still getting punched because you need that million

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 46 points 5 months ago (2 children)

"Hey bro, I'll give you half of the $250k they'll give me to punch you if you let me punch you."

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 31 points 5 months ago (1 children)

If it was a stranger, yes, a friend nope, then I'd be fully honest and offer them the full 50/50.

Remember, it is better to have friends than being temporary rich.

[–] RustyShackleford@literature.cafe 11 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Exactly. Not everyone would be willing, but if you try leading through example, you increase the odds more will take the risk.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 9 points 5 months ago

I am mostly thinking of the fact that sooner or later the friend would find out that you screwed them over, then it is too late, even if you pay them the rest you won't get the same friendship and trust back.

[–] CodexArcanum@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Ah, the classic Ultimatum Game. Economists would say that any amount of money should be acceptable for getting punched in the face, because its better than getting decked for nothing. The vast vast majority of people feel cheated if it isn't a 50/50 split. This is what passes for a "paradox" to economists, who could probably all do with being punched in the face more often.

[–] DaCrazyJamez@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 months ago

As an economist, I agree.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

The problem is that the cost doesn't match the reward. I'd be totally fine with a 90/10 split for just a punch in the face. I'll be over the injury in a week with a lot more than I started with. Raise the cost to losing an arm or leg for a cut, then even 50/50 seems a bit low as the victim's life has changed but the other's hasn't.

I do agree with punching economists in the face more, just in principle.

[–] Churbleyimyam@lemm.ee 0 points 5 months ago

This is why wealth inequality is even more unethical under capitalism than it was under feudalism.

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 45 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Rule 1 in this community. No bigotry.

Every woman I know would do what’s in the bottom panels in order to own a home, pay off loans, etc.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 34 points 5 months ago

Sorry, the picture says they wouldn't, so I have no choice but to believe it.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 0 points 5 months ago

Then why haven't they made a meme saying what they would do in this made up scenario?

[–] IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world 29 points 5 months ago

This is pretty close to incel levels of bad.

[–] AceFuzzLord@lemm.ee 27 points 5 months ago

I don't care if you're male, female, straight, bi, pan, trans, whatever, I don't know a single person who wouldn't do this. Literal free money for minimal effort! I assume it's a wet dream for the majority of people in the world.

[–] hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 5 months ago (1 children)

haha girl dum dum and shallow, boy smart and quirky

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 7 points 5 months ago

We're so different that it's funny! Why is talking to girls so hard?

[–] Matriks404@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

I like how in English you can put emphasis on You in "Thank you", and it has slightly different in meaning. Somehow I've only noticed that like few years ago.

[–] Thteven@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

I've hit my bros for less.

[–] Shardikprime@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago
[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Ah fuck, I can believe you've done this.

[–] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Did you just break the first and second rule