this post was submitted on 22 May 2024
212 points (93.4% liked)

politics

19096 readers
3565 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ZeroCool@vger.social 141 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Jan. 12, 2021: In an interview with Politico, Haley said of Trump, “We need to acknowledge he let us down. He went down a path he shouldn’t have, and we shouldn’t have followed him, and we shouldn’t have listened to him. And we can’t let that ever happen again.”

Source: NBC News - A timeline of Nikki Haley’s past Trump statements

[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 93 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)
[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 19 points 5 months ago

Hey now, she didn't lie. She's not letting it happen again.

She's making it happen again.

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago

Being a Republican

Having real convictions

Pick one, because I haven't seen the ability to do both.

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 98 points 5 months ago (4 children)

I'll say it again, a WOMAN of COLOR being a republican has to be the biggest class traitor of all time.

[–] AshMan85@lemmy.world 50 points 5 months ago (1 children)

i agree with that but pretty sure she is trying to pretend to be white.

[–] neidu2@feddit.nl 8 points 5 months ago

Normally I wouldn't care, but when someone goes out of their way to do so it's hard not to.

She changed her name.

For the same reason Ron DeSantis wears those weird shoes.

[–] herrcaptain@lemmy.ca 29 points 5 months ago (5 children)

TIL that she's Indian-American. I always just assumed she was white and had slightly tanned skin.

Well, just goes to show that you don't need to be white to be a total piece of shit. (Though it sometimes helps.)

[–] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 28 points 5 months ago (3 children)

There's a number of rightwing indian Americans in the US and it honestly gives me secondhand embarrassment as a fellow brown person.

[–] herrcaptain@lemmy.ca 16 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Judging by Modi's electoral success there are a lot of rightwing Indians in India as well. Just goes to show that conservatism can take many forms and doesn't have to adhere to any (specific) racial bounds.

Either way, I feel for you.

[–] Fester@lemm.ee 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

That’s because racism, religion, etc. are tools conservatives use to get rubes to vote against their economic interests. For the people in power, it’s only about power and money. They couldn’t give two fucks about culture wars, abortion, immigration, or anything else outside of riling up and distracting poor people so they fight each other and not them. Some tools work best in the US and different tools are needed in India. You just need the right tool for the job.

[–] herrcaptain@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 months ago

Preach on. It's all about messing up the class consciousness of the working class, using whatever tool is right for the job.

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

At its core, conservatism is all about preserving hierarchies. When you think about that and India's history of its caste system, it's understandable they'd be particularly susceptible to the ideology.

[–] cmbabul@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

I live in Seattle and met a few Indian dudes at a networking event the other month who were both enthusiastically discussing a move to Texas where housing and taxes were really low. I’m white and from the south originally, I did my damnedest to warn them but they looked at me like was crazy.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I could be wrong, but I think it's because Indians who've immigrated to the US are disproportionately upper-caste ones.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Moneo@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Well, just goes to show that you don’t need to be white to be a total piece of shit

Lol I really hope this isn't some revelation to you.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CuttingBoard@sopuli.xyz 2 points 5 months ago

The caste system is still a thing in India. Isn't it just slavery with a different name?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago (1 children)

What about Log Cabin Republicans?

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] TallonMetroid@lemmy.world 21 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Those are the gay Republicans. IIRC during the last midterms they got refused entry to CPAC for being gay.

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Oh wow I didn't know that ... I guess only thing worse would be a gay, colored woman, Republican.

[–] unconsciousvoidling@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Gay colored muslim trans woman.

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Haha true! Can we go deeper?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

See also: the Log Cabin Republicans, the modern day Jews For Hitler, tokens like Herman Cain...

[–] BertramDitore@lemmy.world 93 points 5 months ago (7 children)

I’ll be honest, I fell for it. I thought I had my naivete under control, but man she was convincing to me.

I really didn’t think she would endorse him. Didn’t think she’d endorse Biden either, let’s not be ridiculous. But still. I’m embarrassed that I’m disappointed in her.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 44 points 5 months ago

We hope for people to be better, don’t we.

[–] lobut@lemmy.ca 18 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Don't be embarrassed that you thought better of someone. That's their failure, not yours.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

They are so in their bubble and wrapped up in their tribalism that the very idea of voting Democratic is just so anathema to them. Even if the alternative means the end of the United States.

[–] vividspecter@lemm.ee 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Her extreme policy positions should have given it away. But it's a shame they've all rallied behind the wannabe dictator nevertheless.

[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

She's a Repub.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Coach@lemmy.world 81 points 5 months ago (1 children)

They all fall in line behind Don Poorleone.

[–] DMBFFF@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Don Poorleone.

I like. 😁

[–] Theprogressivist@lemmy.world 71 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Spineless, utterly fucking Spineless.

[–] AshMan85@lemmy.world 33 points 5 months ago

traitors usually are

[–] Kalkaline@leminal.space 29 points 5 months ago

Exactly what I expected. God forbid you have a backbone and stand up against a criminal.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 28 points 5 months ago

Nikki Haley is very much like Donald Trump: She only does anything because she thinks it will benefit herself.

She’ll risk trashing American democracy if it means she has a shot at being the next president to do it some more.

[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 27 points 5 months ago

Typical republican traitor.

[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 25 points 5 months ago (1 children)

No shit. Did anyone have any doubt she wouldn't? So much for Biden "picking up the Haley voters"

[–] easydnesto@sh.itjust.works 17 points 5 months ago

Nope. Just like all republican politicians, I expect them to fall in line behind Donald. Never expected anything else no matter what they said.

[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 15 points 5 months ago

Spineless bitch. Just like the rest of them.

[–] eletes@sh.itjust.works 11 points 5 months ago

For her sake, I hope she negotiated a cabinet position before jumping back on the trump train.

[–] athairmor@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago
[–] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago

There’s not a grand total of 1 spine and 2 testicles among all the GOP voters combined

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

Because of course she will. Republicans are vampires.

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

What a spineless cunt.

[–] takeda@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I'm wondering how much did it cost to change her opinion. When she suspended her campaign she had such a beautiful speech about holding values and doing what's right.

Edit: this is a reminder that all Republicans are corrupted to the core and vote for any is not much better than voting for trump. She didn't have to endorse Biden, but kissing up to trump makes her pathetic especially after her speech. A good president supposed to have some kind of principals.

[–] DMBFFF@reddthat.com 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

At times you don't have to pay Republican whores much.

(and before anyone cites me as being misogynist, Haley isn't half the two-bit whore that Graham or McConnell are)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 31337@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 months ago

Republicans almost never fail to fall in line for their party. This is probably why the party is so politically effective. I wonder if it has something to do with their worldview and belief in hierarchy. Or, maybe they just don't want to be exiled and unable to continue their grifts.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Well there goes my assumption about her strategy. I thought she was positioning herself as the person who would not kiss the ring if Trump should lose, as the "obvious" choice to lead the party that feels they need to throw trumpism under the bus.

Now, it seems pointless, she had both appeared too anti Trump and also ultimately just another Trump adherent. Seems to be a good way to alienate both sides of the Trump phenomenon.

load more comments
view more: next ›