this post was submitted on 17 May 2024
267 points (96.8% liked)

News

22876 readers
4136 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The Republican-led U.S. House of Representatives passed a bill on Thursday that would force President Joe Biden to send weapons to Israel, seeking to rebuke the Democrat for delaying bomb shipments as he urges Israel to do more to protect civilians during its war with Hamas.

The Israel Security Assistance Support Act was approved 224 to 187, largely along party lines. Sixteen Democrats joined most Republicans in voting yes, and three Republicans joined most Democrats in opposing the measure.

The act is not expected to become law, but its passage underscored the deep U.S. election-year divide over Israel policy as Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government seeks to wipe out militants who attacked Israel on Oct. 7, killing around 1,200 people and seizing 253 hostages, according to Israeli tallies.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 146 points 4 months ago (7 children)

Everyone. THE REPUBLICANS sent the weapons.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 75 points 4 months ago (4 children)

The Republicans voted to pass a bill in the House to send the weapons. It will almost certainly fail in the Senate but, even if it doesn't, Biden would have to sign it into law. I don't see Biden signing a bill to override himself, and there is no way that Congress would get the required 2/3 in each chamber to override. This bill was just a performative stunt.

[–] xantoxis@lemmy.world 60 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Sure but the point is, after months of pithy quips about how the Democrats will support genocide of the Palestinians and the Republicans will support genocide of everyone including the Palestinians;

here we see that even on this specific issue, the parties have differences. So make the right choice.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

It says exactly that in the 3rd paragraph of the summary.

The act is not expected to become law ...

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 7 points 4 months ago

Um, OK, but I was responding to a comment that said something different.

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 4 points 4 months ago

A stunt to show the Republicans are sending weapons to Israel.

[–] Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Why would he have to sign it into law? He could veto it. Might even be just the excuse he needs to stop supporting a genocide. As if just supporting the genocide wasn't enough, now he can say he's not supporting the Republicans too.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 2 points 4 months ago

That's what I meant. For it to take effect he would have to sign it into law. There is no reason for him to do that.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 37 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Watch as all the totally-not-parroting-russian-propaganda crowd remain eerily silent.

[–] eskimofry@lemm.ee 5 points 4 months ago

Right, all the anti-genocide protestors will disperse because a U.S bill that hamstrings any attempt to stop the genocide MAY fail.. and hence critics will remain eerily silent.

[–] BossDj@lemm.ee 5 points 4 months ago

They must wait until they are fed the proper response.

It was just locker room talk

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 8 points 4 months ago (12 children)

Feels like they should be adding critical contextual information like this to the titles. I know the headline writers hate the idea of people just reading the headline to get informed (because clicks are needed for ads), but people do get informed that way. It's a very different story if "Congress rebukes Biden on Israel" than "Republicans rebuke Biden on Israel", and I expect "US House" translates into an average reader's mind much more as "Congress" than "Republicans".

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Xanis@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Better say that louder. I can't hear you over the general white noise all the blindly and mindlessly pointing fingers make.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

And that's exactly why we can't vote for genocide Joe. Don't forget to sit out this election or vote third party - that's the only way to have a meaningful impact and improve the lives of Palestinians! /s

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago

I almost at that onion ☺️

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ChihuahuaOfDoom@lemmy.world 51 points 4 months ago (2 children)

America and bombing brown people, name a more iconic duo.

[–] robocall@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago (1 children)

name a more iconic duo.

oh! I know! America and school shootings!

[–] ImADifferentBird@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

America and crushing medical debt

[–] TheCannonball@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The American Dream and other unattainable goals?

[–] ImADifferentBird@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

America and police murdering people

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 50 points 4 months ago (7 children)

So we can definitely say Republicans support genocide harder than Democrats, right? Like this whole debate is over, right? Right?

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 26 points 4 months ago (6 children)

Was that ever a serious debate?

Yes. Republicans are worse.

Doesn’t make Biden “good”. This isn’t a hallmark whodunnit.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (4 children)

The serious debate is defeating trump. I think that’s the only, actual, debate.

Constantly shitting on Biden and discouraging participation is not helpful. And it is constant.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

I was told once on here that Trump would be better for the Palestinians because if Trump was in office the Democrats would fight it harder. Which is the dumbest logic I've ever heard in my life.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] BakerBagel@midwest.social 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

So then there is no excuse for Biden to take a harder stance against Israel since it's a partisan issue right?

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

That doesn't even make any sense. You think Democrats oppose things solely because the Republicans support them? That's childish and stupid. Republicans do that, because they're childish and stupid. Democrats do not.

[–] arin@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Why only 2 choices? We need a proper left party and not corporate fake Democrat

[–] MagicShel@programming.dev 7 points 4 months ago

I feel like we've had this particular conversation several times lately in the public sphere. There can only be two parties in the presidential race. You'll have to co-opt one of them from within to effect change.

[–] eskimofry@lemm.ee 5 points 4 months ago (4 children)

40 is definitely higher than 10 but if its a failing score then you still deserve criticism. the debate was never about republicans. It's asinine to claim that criticism of Biden and democrats is automatically "Both sides are the same" material

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 2 points 4 months ago

I'm not even entirely sure the Republicans would be terribly bothered by that characterization.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 29 points 4 months ago (4 children)

I'm sure all IG posts will now totally have comments about how Republicans want to force support of genocide. /s

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 26 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I am confused I thought Biden sent an arms package to Israel two days ago

https://apnews.com/article/us-israel-arms-gaza-ebe971ca8878ff430ce6458c04151585

Biden administration is moving ahead on new $1 billion arms sale to Israel, congressional aides say

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Nothing happens immediately. The news presents these deals as if they're getting shipped tomorrow, when in actuality they take years to fulfill. The media loves to click-bait about Biden and Israel.

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

Now I am even more confused. Does this mean that weapons shipments to Israel are currently still blocked by Biden?

[–] mightyfoolish@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago

Here you go Biden. You're big chance to show that you don't use the Republicans to pass stuff you don't want to take credit for. Do your best to block it... If you want to.

[–] unmagical@lemmy.ml 12 points 4 months ago

[The bill] would force President Joe Biden to send weapons to Israel.

The act is not expected to become law.

Now why would it not become the law? The house passed it so does it maybe have to go through the Senate first and then ... I think there's another step. Something like the target of the bill would have to sign it into law himself thereby compelling himself to resume sending weapons (which he never stopped doing, btw). Yeah, I can see no reason why this performative bull shit won't become law.

[–] TallonMetroid@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Incidentally, Greene was one of the 3 who voted no.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 6 points 4 months ago

The enemy of my enemy is funny, not my friend.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] robocall@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

this is a performance. It's easy to vote in favor of stuff that has no chance of advancing in the senate.

[–] Wrench@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago

The dems are not unified against Israel. Not by a long shot.

load more comments
view more: next ›