this post was submitted on 13 May 2024
303 points (99.0% liked)

News

23406 readers
4613 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 100 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The swamp has never been swampier

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 24 points 6 months ago (1 children)

'drain the swamp'*

*Terms and conditions apply

[–] Skanky@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago

"Drain the swamp"

Now, fill it with our swamp

[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 92 points 6 months ago

So we have reached the stage where criminals appoint their own trial judges, nice. The mob has made great strides.

[–] Jackcooper@lemmy.world 66 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Were there not other judges available who didn't get placed into their office by the defendant?

[–] BertramDitore@lemmy.world 90 points 6 months ago (1 children)

My understanding is that the judge is chosen by lottery, out of a certain number of judges in the same district. Since that particular district in FL only has a few judges there was always a pretty solid chance that she could be chosen. It wasn’t a certainty, but definitely a good chance.

That’s why her actions are such a betrayal of the justice system. It shouldn’t matter which judge was randomly selected. To anyone with eyeballs, she has shown a distressing preference for the person who appointed her, and has shown over and over again that she doesn’t have the relevant experience to oversee a case of this magnitude. If she were a qualified and impartial judge, she would appreciate the fact that she appears to be completely biased, and recuse herself.

Even if tons of legal experts are wrong about her, which at this point seems pretty unlikely, her duty is to step aside and allow a judge who still has the public’s trust to oversee the case.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 48 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Seems pretty obvious to me that presiding over a case that involves the person that gave a judge their job shouldn't be allowed in the first place...

[–] snooggums@midwest.social 35 points 6 months ago (3 children)

So god appointed her? I thought it was Trump.

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 34 points 6 months ago

¿Por que no los d- *vomit*

[–] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 6 months ago

They're one and the same to Team Turd

[–] Beetlejuice001@lemmy.wtf 1 points 6 months ago

There should be laws against ruling over a case when there should be a recusal. Goes back to the 1% funding the scum in office. Billionaires have ruined society and need to disappear worldwide

[–] kamenoko@sh.itjust.works 13 points 6 months ago

Remember Trump will scream his little mushroom red if a judges 3rd cousin worked for a state election for the Democrats and demand the judge recuses themselves.

When it's Eileen Cannon, a judge appointed by the defendant in the trial? Crickets.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accusation_in_a_mirror