this post was submitted on 13 May 2024
91 points (98.9% liked)

Games

16641 readers
722 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works
91
Marvel Rivals states that the non disparagement clause in their contract was a "miscommunication". (twitter.com)
submitted 5 months ago by nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works to c/games@sh.itjust.works
11 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

all 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 45 points 5 months ago

Lol they got caught.

[–] eee@lemm.ee 43 points 5 months ago

"we're very sorry... that we got caught. rest assured we will do everything we can to ensure... that we do this more subtly in future".

[–] Chozo@fedia.io 32 points 5 months ago

The only "miscommunication" was that they didn't obfuscate the terms through legalese more thoroughly.

[–] Default_Defect@midwest.social 19 points 5 months ago

Do they really think they can do this and no one would notice? Especially after someone gets the hammer if they break it? Its so weird.

[–] CaptObvious@literature.cafe 17 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I mean, it seems pretty clear to me. Nice simple language. Clearly defined common terms. Not much room for misunderstanding or miscommunication.

Unless this is a very peculiar way to spell “We got caught with our pants down.”

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 months ago

Yeah, there was zero miscommunication here. They got caught with their hand in the cookie jar and now they're trying to bullshit their way out.

[–] FlihpFlorp@lemm.ee 15 points 5 months ago (3 children)

So im out of the loop on what happened her both in the game and the legal terms but im guess marvel got caught and are pulling the “whoops I didn’t mean to” card

[–] Treczoks@kbin.social 10 points 5 months ago

In a nutshell: You are only allowed to write reviews if you promised to write good reviews.

[–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

In another post there is a screen shot.

But the basics are, the agreement you had to sign to get into the play test. Has a line that said you couldn't say anything bad about the game.

[–] thudge_mcgerk@kbin.social 1 points 5 months ago

The agreement was for "offical content creators" not for access to the closed beta.

[–] Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 months ago

essentially its similar to product sponsorships and product reviews. Product sponsorships give the sponsor all the power to censor parts they dont like. Reviews should be honest and reveal something is good or bad.

they tried to say in order yo get into beta you can only say good stuff, so any online footage is similar to a sponsorship rather than an honest review