this post was submitted on 10 May 2024
281 points (89.4% liked)

Technology

59582 readers
2500 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 182 points 6 months ago (32 children)

I would mind less if the American auto industry was producing affordable lightweight EVs...

[–] Arbiter@lemmy.world 83 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Or cars with any level of quality.

[–] teamevil@lemmy.world 31 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Hey man the Toyota I drive was made in the USA, it's great.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 28 points 6 months ago

Best we can do is a four ton truck.

load more comments (30 replies)
[–] credo@lemmy.world 68 points 6 months ago (5 children)

Then China shouldn’t subsidize its manufacturers’ exports while increasing the burden for foreign companies to compete internally. If anyone thinks China cornering the global EV market is a good long term plan, they are naive.

[–] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 26 points 6 months ago (1 children)

But I really wanted to die driving the suda sa01 ev which boasts features such as; zero crash ratings standards, and no air bags.

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 13 points 6 months ago

Stop whining and enjoy dying from obesity related complications and Healthcare bankruptcy like the rest of us.

[–] Hildegarde@lemmy.world 17 points 6 months ago (4 children)

The US subsidizes american car companies too. Pot calling the kettle and all.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I don't see how they're going to pass the safety regulations here and in the EU. A ton of their ICE vehicles never made it here because they're dangerously designed and built.

[–] kalleboo@lemmy.world 22 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

The Volvo EX30 is based on a Geely platform, made in China, and does well in the EU (won several Car of the Year awards).

MG (SAIC/Roewe) also has no trouble selling in the EU.

Chinese manufacturers can make regulatory-conforming cars when the market demands it of them. If the market wants cheap and doesn't demand safety, they can do that too.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BombOmOm@lemmy.world 49 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (18 children)

China is becoming an increasingly unreliable trade partner. Preventing them from completely taking over a segment is prudent.

[–] potatopotato@sh.itjust.works 15 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yes, but there's already a steep tariff, it would be nice to let them light a small fire under the us automakers so they make better products for us, instead were kinda just letting them be evil and lazy.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
[–] MrPloppy@lemmy.world 37 points 6 months ago (2 children)

"We want expensive American EVs that most people can't afford, not cheap Chinese ones....."

[–] bostonbananarama@lemmy.world 21 points 6 months ago (16 children)

China is subsidizing EV production and selling cars below cost. Allowing them to be sold in the US would kill the domestic EV market. How is that better for Americans?

[–] isolatedscotch@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 6 months ago (1 children)

wasn't that the whole point of capitalism anyways? /s

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ZetaLightning94@lemmy.world 32 points 6 months ago (7 children)

With how china keeps implanting everything with spyware, I agree to keep them away from the heavy tech incorporated cars. Really wish we could transition away from using chinese shit

[–] Hildegarde@lemmy.world 49 points 6 months ago (3 children)

All auto manufacturers put spyware in their cars now. This isn't a china problem, this is an everyone problem. We need anti-spyware laws that apply to everyone.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] ImFresh3x@sh.itjust.works 29 points 6 months ago (8 children)

Make them in Mexico. Less reliance on one country is better for everyone.

[–] assassinatedbyCIA@lemmy.world 33 points 6 months ago (2 children)

They’re trying to block mexican made Chinese vehicles as well. They don’t want Americans buying cheap evs.

[–] Anyolduser@lemmynsfw.com 11 points 6 months ago (1 children)

No, they don't want the profits getting funneled off to China.

[–] AProfessional@lemmy.world 15 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (11 children)

Thats great for GM and Ford shareholders. It just means Americans can’t afford cars.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] PlexSheep@infosec.pub 23 points 6 months ago (8 children)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 21 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Anti China Republicans are going to HATE this! They would MUCH rather Elect the man whose Daughter got over 70 patents FASTTRACKED in China once he was elected!

[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 17 points 6 months ago

They would just put their hands on their ears and repeat "Hunter Biden laptop" until a scary fact like that one goes away.

[–] Altofaltception@lemmy.world 19 points 6 months ago (6 children)

Something something free market

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 24 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Might be a valid argument if China didn't play currency games.

Also, the protectionist in me wants American heavy industry to continue to exist.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 18 points 6 months ago (15 children)

Isn't it a national security risk?

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 24 points 6 months ago (7 children)

Then he should solve the issue by requiring the code to be hosted on American servers with source code inspection.

Not by making EVs unaffordable.

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 29 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Novel idea: make a car, not a cloud service. My phone is better at navigation etc anyways.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 18 points 6 months ago (7 children)

If only he could extend that rationale to every industry

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] arc@lemm.ee 16 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Protectionism only works in the VERY short term. If the USA doesn't pull its finger out of its ass and make affordable good EVs, then its automotive industry will crash and burn. Because the rest of the world unaffected by tariffs will be buying Chinese (or Korean / European) EVs and not American ones because they'll be expensive and suck.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›