credo

joined 8 months ago
[–] credo@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

Does it 3D?

[–] credo@lemmy.world 34 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (5 children)

Because people point out how bad the website is but refuse to post the video link for some reason: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JHIxyGgSU90

[–] credo@lemmy.world 14 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

What is that- double strand? Weak.

B-

Edit: For the uninitiated.

[–] credo@lemmy.world 15 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

How come we don’t call cruise missiles, “suicide rockets”?

[–] credo@lemmy.world 10 points 17 hours ago

Hey, you guys showed up on “the front page” again. Real sorry about that.

But, hey. IMO, lemmy is anarchism. So there you have it.

[–] credo@lemmy.world 11 points 19 hours ago

So DOGE is getting cut then?

[–] credo@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Well, don’t set any data centers on fire.

[–] credo@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (5 children)

That’s too many positions to research for just one race. Five to six would probably be about the right amount of candidates for a single seat RCV.

I think [open] primaries still have a place to help weed out the field and narrow in on specific candidates.

[–] credo@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

You added a zero (to yesterday’s tally).

And is casualties, not deaths. Casualties includes wounded.

[–] credo@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I hear it’s going to make a comeback soon.

[–] credo@lemmy.world 18 points 5 days ago (4 children)

It’s too complicated to say “a surplus”.

 

For the first time since 538 published our presidential election forecast for Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump, Trump has taken the lead (if a very small one) over Harris. As of 3 p.m. Eastern on Oct. 18, our model gives Trump a 52-in-100 chance of winning the majority of Electoral College votes. The model gives Harris a 48-in-100 chance.

 

It’s kinda how you read the name, innit?

 
view more: next ›