The internet has become soulless and i hate it : technology

[-] Chozo@kbin.social 80 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

The Internet has become soulless

Gee, I wonder what could've contributed to that.

Edit: In case the screenshot doesn't sync to all instances, the screenshot is OP's article immediately asking to send notifications to my device for a site I've never been to before that moment. If you want to know what killed the internet we used to know, it's shit like this. As soon as a page asks to send me notifications, I immediately lose trust in that page and have no inclination to spend any more time there.

For taking about big corpos disrespecting the user experience, this is certainly an ironic move.

[-] TimKicker@feddit.de 34 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Hey. I was watching this thread and created an account just to say that you are right! Bombarding a user with popup stuff is one of the things i criticized in my blog. I completely forgot that i turned on this setting when i set it up (whoops). I changed the "notification-question" to only show once after you visited the site for the fifth time.

Thanks for visiting my site though and for pointing this out to me! <3

[-] MaggiWuerze@feddit.de 12 points 10 months ago

I changed the "notification-question" to only show once after you visited the site for the fifth time.

Which you do by tracking your users instead of generating a value and leaving users to decide if they want to be notified about new content. Put a button on your page that allows for this, but don't go out bothering people.

[-] SillySpy@lemm.ee 11 points 10 months ago

Really interesting article! Most importantly to me, it has spurred some really good conversations.

Personally, I don’t think early web is the answer. Modern web usage has allowed for better accessibility to all ages and types. Content aggregation allows for (but doesn’t guarantee) more views and opinions. There are certainly elements we can get back from the early days, but I think we still need work to find a perfect web

[-] TimKicker@feddit.de 7 points 10 months ago

Thanks!

Of course. There are so many features of the modern web that i’d never give up (speed, security ,accessibility, api’s [that one’s ironic nowadays], dev tools, webgl,…).

Like you said, a great solution would be to combine those newer and older elements in order to create a great web for all. I think that the fediverse is already a great step into the right direction.

[-] SillySpy@lemm.ee 3 points 10 months ago

Absolutely. I guess that’s why many of us are here.

[-] Aesthesiaphilia@kbin.social 6 points 10 months ago

Modern web usage has allowed for better accessibility to all ages and types.

One could argue that this is part of the problem.

[-] SillySpy@lemm.ee 9 points 10 months ago

Interesting. I agree that there are some that make the internet a worse place, but surely we wouldn’t want to close the internet to all the others that could use it for good?

[-] Provider@feddit.de 1 points 10 months ago

Thanks!

Of course. There are so many features of the modern web that i'd never give up (speed, security ,accessibility, api's [that one's ironic nowadays], dev tools, webgl,...).

Like you said, a great solution would be to combine those newer and older elements in order to create a great web for all. I think that the fediverse is already a great step into the right direction.

[-] cakeistheanswer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 10 months ago

Welcome to the part of the Internet with a soul.

Seriously if you're old enough to remember the Internet in terms of users weird passion projects you could do a lot worse than hanging off any part of activitypub.

There's a lot more people than the old days with technical backgrounds, so there's a lot more practical stuff.

[-] davehtaylor@beehaw.org 50 points 10 months ago

I do understand the overall point they're trying to make here. As someone who's been around the web and internet since the early 90s, there was a certain magic to the chaos of those early days.

However, this bit:

A couple of imageboards still exist, who remind us of a different time. You may not like it, but even 4chan is such a place and i am happy that dumpster is still around.

really makes me wonder about OP. 4chan/8chan/et al have caused incalculable harm. The the world would be a better place if they were completely eradicated, and would have been an even better place had they never existed at all. Sites like those aren't indicative of a different time, they're indicative of the true depths of hatred, toxicity, and sheer chaotic evil people are capable of when given an anonymous platform and no moderation.

[-] potterman28wxcv@beehaw.org 11 points 10 months ago

You make a point. If we were to relive the 90s both technology-wise and before corporations put their hands on it (so, assuming plenty of websites done by users), I am sure there would be quite a few websites filled with hate, racism, xenophobia etc..

It's not just the corporate greediness that changed. It's the mentality as a whole. We live in a stressful time period where being aggressive towards other people is more of a norm than, say, creating genuine content with lots of colors because that is cool. In the 90s I feel like people were just enjoying life and did not have to worry much. At least, that's how I perceive it. Even piece of arts like music or movies felt more genuine and happier.

But the author also makes a point that corporations certainly did not make it better.

[-] ricecake@beehaw.org 10 points 10 months ago

Keep in mind that a lot of the "bad" of today is just people noticing the bad that's been there all along.

People still make fun colorful content, and we make more of that now than we did in the 90s.
It's just that the hateful angry people didn't have Internet access then, and they do now.

It wasn't considered okay to talk about a lot of problems at the time, and it is now.

The Internet of the 90s is incompatible with billions of people using it.
Once you make Internet access less something that only a small group of relatively privileged people have access to, and less are interested in, and something that a more representative sample of the world can use and want to use, you find out that people more often prioritize sex, cats, banal updates on their friends and family, gossip, and to get it in a easy to absorb package.

[-] Lowbird@beehaw.org 7 points 10 months ago

Yeeeah I sure wouldn't want to be trans on the internet in the 90s. Or a woman, either. Or Black.

I think it's easy to remember the good parts over the bad, and to not see the empty spaces where people weren't allowed into the club at all back then. At least some of the lost civility was just a facade, and limited to a very specific in-group.

But I do think social media algorithms that prioritize rage for ads are a real problem that makes everything feel worse, too. I'm glad Twitter is going down fast.

Also I agree with you in that I could do with more happy media. But of course only the best/most popular media from prior decades is preserved and remembered and celebrated, so I think any seemingly loss of quality is likely survivorship bias + personal taste + the difficulty of finding things when there are a lot of things.

One of my own personal sources of media joy is ao3, and that wasn't founded until 2008, and only entered beta in 2009. That alone means heaps and heaps of well-organized (so well organized!) fanfiction - including humor and fluff and other happy stuff - that I love to bits and that didn't exist at all until recently. Every time ao3 goes down a crowd of distressed people flood Down Detector and exclaim about how they were just in the middle of their [insert hyperspecific fanfic here] and got left on a cliffhanger - it's kinda adorable.

[-] tables@kbin.social 36 points 10 months ago

While I understand the sentiment, I hate this trend that whenever someones talks about how soulless the internet has become, the answer is always Web 1.0.

I don't want web 1.0. I like having CSS and Javascript around. I use them to build things I couldn't with HTML alone, and I've seen countless incredibly creative websites which fundamentally couldn't have been built without Javascript. It's weird to me how the article mentions the creative aspect of the old web, versus the commercial aspect and "sameyness" of the current web, only to then toss out tools that allow for even more creativity and personalization in the current web.

Whenever I finish reading one of these articles it always feels like it's mostly nostalgia and not much else.

[-] spiderman@ani.social 1 points 10 months ago

the problem is not the technology but how the tech companies use it to their value and kill everything that felt so special when we used the internet a decade ago (or two)

[-] 8000mark@discuss.tchncs.de 35 points 10 months ago

The article is a bit too nostalgic for my tastes, and hyping 4chan or Web 1.0 surrogates is not going to put the Internet back into users' hands.

Everybody should rather take a look at what Ari Balkan is doing with the Small Web concept over at his blog. He's also on Mastodon and generally seems like a great guy.

[-] bermuda@beehaw.org 14 points 10 months ago

guy's really named after a sea and a mountain range

[-] drkt@feddit.dk 19 points 10 months ago

ok bermuda

[-] bermuda@beehaw.org 8 points 10 months ago

neither a sea nor a mountain range

[-] Provider@feddit.de 5 points 10 months ago

Seems like an interesting project

[-] snowbell@beehaw.org 2 points 10 months ago

Interesting!

[-] Zoop@beehaw.org 1 points 10 months ago

How neat! Thanks for those links.

[-] SemioticStandard@beehaw.org 33 points 10 months ago

The personalized, colorful web pages became streamlined, conforming to modern design standards and sacrificing individuality for uniformity.

There are some pretty big advantages to 'modern design standards.' For one, they make the Internet a less hostile place to users with accessibility needs. I don't have problems viewing clashing colors, flying gifs, jumbled pages with no sanity, etc, but a hell of a lot of people with various disabilities sure do. I don't want to even think about how screen readers try to deal with pages like that. Web1.0 offered absolutely nothing for those users who needed accessibility.

[-] luciole@beehaw.org 13 points 10 months ago

This kind of reminds me of the car nostalgia and the complaint that nowadays they all look samey. Turns out it’s not because they’re built by big soulless corporations (they are though), but because that vaguely roundish running shoe look is what you get when you optimize for efficiency and you apply safety regulations.

[-] Lowbird@beehaw.org 4 points 10 months ago

I feel like both things are true with this one. I mean, at least they could be more creative with the paint, surely? Or detailing? Maybe some fun etchings? Fun car interior designs?

It's a mass-market product so I do get why they don't, but man, there are way too many boring gray and white cars that just match the pavement.

[-] Arotrios@kbin.social 30 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Blog writer with vague complaint and no solutions stumbles across popular headline - more at 11.

The issue at play is the big corporate companies, that pretended to be public services, had their venture capital dry up and felt pressure to become profitable. The subsequent monetization and censorship within those systems had significant impact on the quality of content, but outside of those systems the internet has continued to flourish. I suggest the author get off of Reddit/Meta/TwitX, use a better search engine than Google, and start checking out the Fediverse.

Remember kids, the big social media companies will always want you to think that they are the entirety of the internet. But the internet is not a network of machines. It's a network of human minds, and no organization will ever be able to contain the raw chaos that is the collective force of human imagination.

[-] Aesthesiaphilia@kbin.social 7 points 10 months ago

The issue at play is the big corporate companies

I'm guessing you weren't around before these guys ate up the internet?

The issue at play IS the big corporate companies. Period.

[-] Arotrios@kbin.social 14 points 10 months ago

They didn't eat it up, although they certainly want you to think they did, and it's clear they convinced you.

I've been on the internet since the BBS days. Centralized services rise and fall, and people said the internet was dead when AOL became the big portal, and then they said it with Yahoo, and Digg, and Facebook, and now Reddit and Twitter. It's kinda like people who are always saying the world is gonna end - it never ends - it just changes.

I'd actually argue that we're at a point of an internet renaissance spurred by the combined failures of Reddit, Twitter, and Meta to maintain contributor trust. They can't control the flow of human imagination that pulses through the internet, they can only channel it. If they try to dam it, well, it's just gonna overflow into fuckSpezicles all over /r/place and carry the cream to the Fediverse and beyond.

I'm not saying that big corporations aren't a problem, I'm saying they don't have to be our problem now that we're here, and anyone who says the internet is dead isn't looking in the right places.

[-] nromdotcom@beehaw.org 13 points 10 months ago

It's always interesting when someone is like "I wish I could go back to using smaller sites/forums or try some more open/ethical platforms, but I can't because all of my family are on Facebook."

Remember just 20 years ago when most of your family wasn't anywhere on the internet and that was just fine? I recognize that I'm saying this as a semi-isolated weirdo on some relatively obscure corner of the Internet, but it's okay to not be in constant passive contact with everyone you've ever met. Yeah it's more work to keep in touch with the folks you actually care about if you can't do so passively via Facebook, but that's how it always was. Email exists, texts and phone calls exist, meeting up exists.

If there are people you care about you can still keep in touch with them without using the same social media platform as them. Just like in the 90s you didn't need to read rec.models.railroad to keep in touch with your model train loving uncle.

I get that these connections (whatever one might say of their quality or tangibility if the interaction is just "look at picture, press like button") are important to people and one of the positives of platforms like Facebook, but if you're going to bemoan not being able to seek alternatives solely because the entire world isn't switching with you, it's important to realize that is a choice and not a requirement.

[-] Arotrios@kbin.social 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Lol - my family being on Facebook is one of the reasons I post here instead.

I actually think the dynamic you speak of helps the quality of the Fediverse specifically. I've seen it in play with other emerging platforms, where the adventurous sorts leap onto the new software and start creating content, while the more social sorts like to hang on to what they're familiar with because they value the community... up until the content begins to dry out, because all the adventurous sorts are usually the ones driving the creative soul of a platform.

Then the real migration begins (which I believe we're at the beginning of with Reddit & Twitter), and you see an influx of the social sorts. This is the point at which you and I chuckle and say "cool, you've got a new Fediverse account? I've been posting there for awhile - I'll follow you - can't wait to see what you've got".

Then you have that sweet spot where both the creative/adventurous sorts live in harmony with the social sorts and that's what makes a vibrant internet community, until Spez spazzes or Elon buys it out, making the community miserable. That is until, like Leif Erikson seeking a warm land to grow grapes on to make wine to have a fuckin' raging party, the adventurous sorts once again venture out into the great wide expanse of Open Source to find the next digital kegger.

Such is the circle of life.

[-] ArtZuron@beehaw.org 2 points 10 months ago

There's Leif Erickson and then there's Columbus. Columbus is Elon or Spez.

[-] morry040@kbin.social 2 points 10 months ago

Agreed. As soon as a web service decides to prioritise revenue growth above the user experience, it's over. This is usually in the form of an IPO, so if you happen to be a fan of a particular service, as soon as they start talking about going public, start looking for a free / open-source alternative.

[-] Fizz@lemmy.nz 26 points 10 months ago

The internet sucks and I hate it.. until I stopped using the platforms I don't like and started using the ones that give me hope. I don't care anymore if it's not the biggest thing on the internet it's still more people than I would ever reach irl.

[-] ThePJN@sopuli.xyz 17 points 10 months ago

Neocities (mentioned in the article) is a pretty cool throwback site for making your own simple webpages. I used it for a coding exercise to make my own personal version of a Linktree thing.

Bear blog (link) is also simple and neat for simple un-corporate internet-ing.

[-] TimKicker@feddit.de 3 points 10 months ago

That blog looks nice!

[-] valvin@beehaw.org 16 points 10 months ago

Many of us have this kind of feeling. That's why there are: Small web, inidie web, Gemini... Without being extremist with noJS websites (even if it's not a bad idea), let's create content outside platforms. I hope a day blogs will come back and RSS reader became back a trend. So we'll take back control of a (small) part of the Internet.

[-] pruwybn@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 10 months ago

I like that the article has some positivity (and some cool links) at the end.

Also, I definitely feel like the fediverse is a step toward a less soulless (more soulful?) internet.

[-] TimKicker@feddit.de 4 points 10 months ago

If you liked the links, there are also backup of some geocities sites. And yeah, the fediverse gives the user some sort of control back, i like it here.

[-] style99@kbin.social 10 points 10 months ago

the internet is magical.

[-] nothacking@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 10 months ago

You can do your part by just starting your own website.

[-] Cypher@lemmy.zip 5 points 10 months ago

Check out !Oldweb@lemmy.ml.

[-] GuyDudeman@beehaw.org 5 points 10 months ago

Joke’s on you… it never had a soul!

[-] OneRedFox@beehaw.org 5 points 10 months ago

Come to think of it, are there any noteworthy sites besides tumblr that let you customize web pages like those latter two screenshots? Say what you will about the aesthetic, it definitely has personality.

[+] cwagner@lemmy.cwagner.me 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

[deleted]

[-] reclipse@lemdro.id 2 points 10 months ago

And I love it

[-] cakey@beehaw.org 2 points 10 months ago

god i so wish that i could create my own colorful website, but html/css/javascript were always near impossible for me :( great article, thank you for sharing!

[-] zakomo@beehaw.org 4 points 10 months ago

To be honest, the minimum you really need for a colourful website is just HTML and a dash of inline CSS, especially if you want to recreate that nostalgic early internet type of feeling. JavaScript is very much optional.

In my opinion you should start easy, understand how it all clicks together, especially HTML and then start building, and eventually rebuilding, on top of it after you have grasped the basics. Most people gets scared by HTML, CSS and JavaScript because they are usually presented together as if you couldn't use one without the others, but you most certainly can.

Just my 2 cents.

[-] TimKicker@feddit.de 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Thank you for reading! There are great tutorials for beginners regarding html/css. Also you can also start with copying the html text of another site and modify it.

[+] storksforlegs@beehaw.org 1 points 10 months ago

[deleted]

Technology