this post was submitted on 08 May 2024
236 points (97.6% liked)

News

23406 readers
3278 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Disgraced biotech company founder is now due to be released in August 2032, two years and four months before original date

Elizabeth Holmes, the disgraced former chief executive of the blood-testing company Theranos, has had her federal prison sentence shortened again, new records show.

The 40-year-old Holmes is now scheduled for release on 16 August 2032 from a federal women’s prison camp in Bryan, Texas, according to the US Bureau of Prisons website.

Holmes’s sentence was reduced by more than four months, as her previous release date was set for 29 December 2032.

A spokesperson for the Bureau of Prisons confirmed Holmes’s amended sentence to the Guardian but said he could not comment further due to “privacy, safety and security reasons” for inmates.

This is the second time  that Holmes has had her sentence shortened. In July, was reduced by two years.

People incarcerated in the US can have their sentences shortened for good conduct and for completing rehabilitation programs, such as a substance abuse program.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SirSamuel@lemmy.world 107 points 6 months ago (2 children)

That's the way it was. Privilege, which just means 'private law.' Two types of people laugh at the law; those that break it and those that make it.

Night Watch by Terry Pratchett

[–] androogee@midwest.social 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I mean certainly that's true to some extent.

But people get their sentences reduced all the time, for lots of reasons.

There's just not a headline every time it happens to a poor person.

How much of this is just a bias of awareness?

[–] SirSamuel@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You make a fair point.

It just felt like a good place to drop a little social commentary from my favorite author

[–] androogee@midwest.social 5 points 6 months ago

He was truly a treasure.

[–] GFGJewbacca@lemm.ee 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You're making me want to reread all of the books. GNU, Terry Pratchett.

[–] SirSamuel@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

If you're ever wondering "Should I reread the entire discworld series?" The answer is Yes

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 39 points 6 months ago (1 children)

People incarcerated in the US can have their sentences shortened for good conduct and for completing rehabilitation programs, such as a substance abuse program.

She didn't exactly complete a substance abuse program to reduce her sentence by two years. Instead, she invented this blood test that uses AI to determine what drugs people could most easily become addicted to.

/s

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 35 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

She defrauded investors. That’s the only reason she’s seeing prison time at all- money. The ethics of her medical product were not the issue, even if they should’ve been.

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 15 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

I was going more for a ”wanna see me do it again” sort of gallows humor. I agree that the most fucked up part is that she's only experiencing a facsimile of "justice" because she "stole" money from people richer than her.

I hate that we live in a world where the greatest crime imaginable is punching upwards.

[–] the_post_of_tom_joad@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah and I'm sure shes in one of those rich people prisons too, the kind you or i will never see the inside of no matter what we do

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Hard to tell looking at it on Google street view and satellite view. It looks pretty cushy for a prison, but who knows, especially in Texas.

[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 6 points 6 months ago

Bingo.

Defraud the public: slap on the wrist
Defraud the wealthy: straight to jail

[–] Gork@lemm.ee 37 points 6 months ago (10 children)

What's also a bit tragic about all of this is that she chose to have kids right before going to prison. So now her children have to essentially spend their formative years without their mother in their life, other than the prison phone calls and visitation.

Maybe there's a silver lining. There is a chance they'll grow into better people than she did

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Bet someone told her that new moms receive a reduced prison sentence before she decided to take kids.

[–] sparky@lemmy.federate.cc 1 points 6 months ago

The timing combined with her weird sociopathic nature make it all but a certainty that her decision to have kids was entirely driven by the possibility of a reduced sentence.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 21 points 6 months ago (4 children)

You can't rehabilitate people like this. They are fundamentally broken.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 24 points 6 months ago

Her sentence was reduced by "more than four months," so I don't know that this is the best example of the broken justice system.

However, I also disagree that people like this should not be given the chance to rehabilitate themselves. Our punitive prison system doesn't work.

[–] VaultBoyNewVegas@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Disagree on her being broken. She's a con artist not a mass murderer who was abused from childhood and failed repeatedly by the larger world.

[–] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)
[–] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 10 points 6 months ago (1 children)

She's only in prison because she cost rich people money. It has nothing to do with her endangering lives.

[–] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

sadfsdfasfasf

[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

She also hasn't had repercussions for defrauding individuals. She financially injured Walgreens. That's why she is in jail and the other people you mention are not.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

We don’t take rehabilitation seriously in the US. Prison is simply out of sight, out of mind.

[–] Thorry84@feddit.nl 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Plus a big dose of vengeance, they need to be treated like inhuman trash, they need to suffer for their crimes.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Treat a man like an animal long enough and you’ll train him to act like one.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago

I don't know. She's clearly a problem, but I don't think it serves the greater good to write off any prisoners, or assume anyone cannot be rehabilitated. We should try, not for her, but for all of us.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

"Communist labor camps but only for CEOs "

The major problem is she did do what most US CEOs do. Look at Musk: one of the richest men on the planet and not a single promise he's made about technology has panned out.

The system incentivizes these kinds of liars are charlatans

[–] rekabis@lemmy.ca 10 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

For the exact same crime with the exact same damages, the gender sentencing gap is three times larger than the wealth sentencing gap, and seven times larger than the racial sentencing gap.

Having been born female (or to materially/physically transition to female) is quite literally the single most effective “get out of jail free” card you could possibly possess.

load more comments
view more: next ›