this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2024
553 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

59143 readers
2288 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 66 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (9 children)

Also: Which 2 states are the sane ones where this would be illegal?

Edit: California and Maryland. And you can have one in California, if you get a special permit.

[–] RIP_Cheems@lemmy.world 24 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (9 children)

Because. Also, flamethrower aren't considered weapons by the government, so the only states that limits you from buying one is California and Ohio and Maryland banned them.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 11 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Ohio has a ban too? The company that makes these is based in Ohio lol

[–] RIP_Cheems@lemmy.world 14 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (5 children)

Not a ban, a restriction. Like California, you need a permit. Sorry if I made that confusing.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 55 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Well now I'm definitely going to have to save up $10,000 for a flame-throwing robot dog.

How else am I going to protect myself from all the flame-throwing robot dogs?

[–] Juice@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The only defense against a bad guy with a flame throwing robot dog, is a good guy with a flame throwing robot dog

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

What about a neutral girl with a flame throwing robot dog?

[–] TheOgreChef@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Believe it or not, a chaotic neutral or lawful good girl with a flame throwing robot dog. There are some nuances if you’re using Pathfinder.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MonkderDritte@feddit.de 18 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (10 children)

How else am I going to protect myself from all the flame-throwing robot dogs?

Build a tesla coil for $100.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hal_5700X@sh.itjust.works 50 points 6 months ago
[–] HipsterTenZero@dormi.zone 44 points 6 months ago (22 children)

What possible use case is there for this that isn't a felony of some description?

[–] dariusj18@lemmy.world 47 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Gonna assume controlled burns in difficult terrain.

[–] snooggums@midwest.social 25 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Also the reason that flamethrowers aren't illegal in most states, since being able to project flame makes controlled burns a lot easier.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 24 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Deer hunting. Don't think, just buy one and do it. It's the American way.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] adam_y@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] adam_y@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

I say that, but I, in no way, want that to happen.

But yeah, Boston Dynamic have long said that they don't want their robots weaponised, but here we are seeing it happen.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 9 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Boston Dynamics has made multiple robots for DARPA. If they make a really great platform, I expect they're probably gonna be weaponized at some point. Maybe not by them, but...

I remember a buddy of mine who was working on an autonomous, self-mapping rover research project at his university on a DARPA project. He was just working on the navigation side, part of a larger project. He was telling me how he had a "huh" moment when they got the first control unit and it had a big red button on it labelled "weapon".

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

Employees trying to unionize.

At least it seems like that sort of thing never ends up being a felony...

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] Mastengwe@lemm.ee 35 points 6 months ago (1 children)

“Flame-throwing robot dogs don’t kill people, people kill people”

[–] NeptuneOrbit@lemmy.world 17 points 6 months ago (6 children)

Dear ladies and gentleman of the jury. I will now argue that the LLM that programmed the fire breathing dog, did so in such a manner as to make it sentient. The dog was able to and did act of it's own accord when it killed the woman, Ms Smith. The defendant here did not create sentience in the dog, nor could he have known turning the dog on, outside, may result in the fire breathing dog torch a bystander to death.

You can see here, the dogs walking and urination patterns closely align with a real, organic dog. This definitively proves that the dog killed the woman, and now the defendant, who only released the dog into nature. Thank you very much.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Quexotic@infosec.pub 31 points 6 months ago (4 children)

"The Mechanical Hound slept but did not sleep, lived but did not live in its gently humming, gently vibrating, softly illuminated kennel back in a dark corner of the firehouse"

Here we go...

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 26 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)
[–] sentient_loom@sh.itjust.works 26 points 6 months ago

I hate this but it's hilarious. It's a microcosm of everything that's making me depressed right now, and somehow that's precisely why it's amazing.

[–] Nerrad@lemmy.world 23 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Lying on my bed, my new dog will keep me warm on cool winter nights.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

According to the FAQ on the flamethrower, while the unit is apparently pretty flexible in fuel that it can handle, the recommended fuel is mostly diesel. I'd imagine that one could use biodiesel and do climate-friendly heating.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 6 months ago (6 children)

This is a great day! I think we can ALL agree that it's been deeply frustrating to be priced out of the flame throwing robot dog market for so long.

[–] Chozo@fedia.io 9 points 6 months ago

This is an absolute W for flamethrowing robot dog enthusiasts everywhere.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Erasmus@lemmy.world 16 points 6 months ago

Israeli Military have entered the chat.

[–] menemen@lemmy.world 16 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Imagine telling your insurance about your newest purchase.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 16 points 6 months ago (1 children)

So how much for a shark with a frickin' laser beam attached to its head?

[–] Murdoc@sh.itjust.works 9 points 6 months ago

I'd settle for some ill-tempered sea bass.

[–] Jimmyeatsausage@lemmy.world 15 points 6 months ago

Totally replacing my snowblower with one of these

[–] ParabolicMotion@lemmy.world 15 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Great. Which country has your bet for the first country to sic these on their enemies?

[–] fubarx@lemmy.ml 15 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Fire-extinguisher robot dogs in 3, 2, ...

[–] MashedTech@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

Yeah, no. Saving people sounds like a waste of money. How can we monetize saving them? Their deaths are way more lucrative.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 13 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Even less money for a real dog and flame-thrower....

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Deepus@lemm.ee 13 points 6 months ago (3 children)

*...30-foot flame-throwing range, and Wi-Fi and Bluetooth"

Is that wifi6? 🤔

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] antler@feddit.rocks 12 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

Anyone able to loan me under $10,000? It's for something really cool.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 11 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (4 children)

I just want one that delivers a beer and a hunk of summer sausage.

But a flamethrower? I guess...sure?

burns down house during summer sausage delivery

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

I think I made one of those in the new Zelda game

[–] PiratePanPan@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 6 months ago
[–] Hugh_Jeggs@lemm.ee 8 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Whatever happened to all the people that bought the Boring Company flamethrower?

They'd be a good customer base for this, but strangely I never hear how they're getting on now

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

Considering it was a Musk product, it probably fell apart in their hands the first time they tried to pull the trigger. If it didn't explode in their faces.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MiDaBa@lemmy.ml 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I need it for personal protection.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›