this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2024
151 points (95.8% liked)

World News

32318 readers
827 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] slacktoid@lemmy.ml 36 points 8 months ago

I thought i just had to avoid getting on a Boeing, now i have to watch out for the ones in the sky?

[–] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 36 points 8 months ago (4 children)

I know that Boeing's on everyone's shit list these days, but the company doesn't even make aviation tires. Unless a failure in one of Boeing's systems caused tire damage this is probably due to poor maintenance by the airline, or a defective tire manufactured by Goodyear, Michelin, Bridgestone or Dunlop.

[–] homura1650@lemm.ee 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Boing makes the plane. If they choose to contract out portions, they are responsible for managing the subcontractors; which includes quality control.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 8 months ago

No, they literally might not have installed this tire. It's like blaming Toyota for a flat on your 2010 Corolla.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I was about to ask. We'll have to wait for information on which component failed here.

If all Boeing planes are questionable, it's reasonable to ask what the US government will do about it. They're the definition of too big to fail, but at the same times lives are very directly in the balance.

[–] False@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

It's telling that they've got their reputation at the point where any time there's a problem with an air plane people assume it was them.

[–] bamboo@lemm.ee 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

The core issue causing the quality control issues with Boeing is actually that they are outsourcing more and more of the design and manufacturing of their planes, and then squeezing their contractors, knowing that their contractors don’t have any other options, aerospace is both regional and consolidated. Boeing will gladly point out whenever there is a failure that it is the fault of the contractor that designed the relevant part or system, but it’s generally not that the contractor was incompetent, but rather that they were given an unreasonably tight budget and forced to deliver something.

[–] DmMacniel@feddit.de 33 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Let me guess, an air wave hit it?

[–] bradv@lemmy.ca 22 points 8 months ago (2 children)
[–] Nougat@fedia.io 14 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It's been towed outside the environment.

[–] podperson@lemm.ee 9 points 8 months ago

Well, the tire’s not supposed to fall off.

[–] QuikxSpec@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

So you’re saying there’s a chance!

[–] nightwatch_admin@feddit.nl 21 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Why is everyone so obsessed with this? Should not be a surprise: You all know Boeing was named after the sound of falling parts hitting the ground, right?

[–] DmMacniel@feddit.de 11 points 8 months ago

Ah of course, like the Boeing ball.

[–] jenny_ball@lemmy.world 15 points 8 months ago (1 children)

God these airline companies need a overhaul. stop stuffing the flights and make them a few inches more roomy. stop cutting corners. offer good refund policies and shit. they are such bastards

[–] AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Boeing has had issues for a while. I work in commercial aviation certification and all the senior engineers I work with are ex-boeing guys who took the early retirement plan some years ago when it was offered. According to them anyone who knew anything left and the competition from Airbus has forced them to attempt to speed up the certification process. The FAA gets final approval over new airplane designs but more of the engineering review and approval comes from a private ODA, which Boeing has their own. You have a company despite for sales who can "approve" their own designs. There is definitely corporate pressure forcing approvals to go faster.

[–] doeknius_gloek@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 8 months ago (4 children)
[–] otter@lemmy.ca 6 points 8 months ago

16 year old video, wow

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

I want to know how many people believe that's real.

[–] BurningRiver@beehaw.org 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Did he say “achtung scheiße”? Those are literally the only two German words I know.

[–] DmMacniel@feddit.de 3 points 8 months ago

He says "Ach du Scheiße" which translate "Oh Shit"

[–] DmMacniel@feddit.de 0 points 8 months ago

Hoffe jemand hat aufgepasst.

[–] bigkahuna1986@lemmy.ml 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

SF Chronicle: "You've got an ad blocker installed"

Inspect element: "This is not the ad blocker you're looking for"

[–] False@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Disabling JavaScript fixes 95% of these issues too.

[–] ulkesh@beehaw.org 8 points 8 months ago

What a shit show Boeing has become.

[–] SirSamuel@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

There's a lot of crapping on Boeing here, and don't get me wrong, they've earned the criticism. However, I'd be very surprised if this incident wasn't actually traced back to maintenance issues with the airline.

If course, that was also my thought when i first heard about the plug door, and it lasted up until I learned the plane was so new it likely hadn't even been through it's first A check.

[–] Lexam@lemmy.ca 4 points 8 months ago

Flying is the safest way to travel is what the airlines want you to think Hank!

[–] cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 8 months ago

Well, at least it wasn’t the front that fell off. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3m5qxZm_JqM