this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2023
6 points (87.5% liked)

Science Communication

871 readers
2 users here now

Welcome to c/SciComm @ Mander.xyz!

Science Communication



Notice Board

This is a work in progress, please don't mind the mess.



About

Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Be kind and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.


Resources

Outreach:

Networking:



Similar Communities


Sister Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Plants & Gardening

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Memes

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Lovc@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We obviously should have done that 60 years ago when climate change was becoming recognized. We didn't because it would impact profits and slightly modify our way of life. Now that impact is much greater so people dont want to change. The problem is we will eventually have to address it and pushing it off to the next generation is compounding the problem.

[–] TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Sounds like so many other problems the boomer generation has "dealt with". The real barriers now are large corporations and legislation. Unfortunately the US is largely run by ancient slugs in the pocket of big money.

[–] TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz 3 points 1 year ago

I hate politics. No matter how much quality research is done, the opposition can keep paying unscrupulous actors to "publish" things that support them. Forget about the public being able to tell the difference. My take is that this will never go away unless we develop entirely different governments. Maybe something based on merit, like only PhDs with 20 years of experience in a field can make these decisions. Per relevant topic of course.

load more comments
view more: next ›