this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2024
39 points (84.2% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35779 readers
933 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RedEyeFlightControl@lemmy.world 46 points 10 months ago (2 children)

It's a prediction. Predictions aren't always 100% accurate.

[–] kn33@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

But they know that the prediction is wrong. So why not update it?

[–] cecilkorik@lemmy.ca 11 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

a) Forecasts are very resource-intensive, they are performed on a specific schedule using a computational forecast model. Updating the predictions would require inputting new data and running the model again, and by the time they do that, the next forecast will already be out.

b) Do they know it's wrong? Where did you get the temperature? From an official weather station? If not, there is no reason to imagine that someone is noticing that this one particular model run was wrong in one particular spot across the whole country and trying to fix it in real time.

c) If you did get the current temperature from an official weather station, that IS your update for it. Real time data from official weather stations is always going to trump the forecast model. What would be the point of updating the forecast when the current measured data from the weather station is now available? That's like driving down the highway and saying "I was predicting my speed would be close to 65mph, but due to the heavy traffic I'm seeing today, I'm going to re-estimate my speed to be 45mph" when you have a perfectly accurate speedometer right in front of you telling you exactly what speed you are going at all times. Forecasts are only useful for the future, and they can be wrong.

[–] ivanafterall@kbin.social 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] ivanafterall@kbin.social 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Stupid science bitches couldn't even make I more smarter!

[–] evasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.world 25 points 10 months ago (1 children)

My understanding is that the predicted low is for the upcoming night, not the lowest temperature in that 24 hour block

[–] XeroxCool@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

This has been my experience when looking at the hourly temperature predictions. The "day" starts at a normal wakeup time

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 16 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's right in your title:

predicted low

Predictions are not guaranteed to occur, thats why they call it a prediction and not a prophecy.

[–] vrek@programming.dev 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

true but shouldn't the low be updated with current observations?

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 11 points 10 months ago

Not when it's early morning. The temperature is on the rise from the previous night. The prediction you're seeing is for the coming night.

[–] snooggums@kbin.social 1 points 10 months ago

My regional temp estimates are far enough away for a few degrees difference as I am closer to a large body of water. In my case it is only a couple of miles/few kilometers distance for that variation.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 13 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)
  1. Weather predictions are not 100% accurate.
  2. The place making the predictions may be using different instrumentation or be in a different location than the instrumentation used to give you real time info. This is also why what the app says it is and what a thermometer right in front of you says can also be different.
[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The announced numbers are based on the station that records the data which likely has a different microclimate.

An example, the weather station I use is recorded at an international airport so the heat of the sun reflecting off the concrete causes the low to be higher than my place on the other side of a hill which gets the sun later in the day.

Forecasts are generalisation of weather as predicting the future is not possible.

[–] vrek@programming.dev 4 points 10 months ago

That makes sense since my station is probably an international airport also.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 7 points 10 months ago

Aren't the highs / lows what were forecast and the current temperature based on actual measurements from weather stations?

I guess they don't update the high/low to match observed readings.

[–] Thorry84@feddit.nl 6 points 10 months ago

This depends on the implementation of whatever you are looking at. The weather app I use does integrate actual measurements in the forecast for today.

[–] SereneHurricane@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

It's 13 now, it will be 29 later today, and down to 16 overnight

[–] awwwyissss@lemm.ee 3 points 10 months ago

Thermometer reading vs perceived temperature? Factoring in wind-chill, humidity, etc with "Realfeel" or some other estimate.

[–] elfin8er@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I know it doesn't really answer your question, but that UI is so confusing. What does "13°F Today 29°F/16°F" mean? We can assume that it means it's 13°F right now, and today was predicted to be a high of 29° and a low of 16°, but there isn't really enough information to know for sure without additional context. The 29°F/16°F could be the predicted highs for the morning/evening instead. 13°F could also be the predicted temperature for today and 29°F/16°F could be tomorrow's predicted temperature. There's just not enough info to know what the numbers are saying.

[–] Bongles@lemm.ee 3 points 10 months ago

Out of context you're right, but most of the time when you open a weather app you'll get a more detailed view where you can see, in this example, that 29 is the high and 16 is the low for the day with 13 being the current temperature. Once you look at that one time you would know what these numbers are in this shortened view.

[–] AreaKode@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

High is the warmest it will get today. Low is the temperature at sunrise tomorrow morning.

[–] sagrotan@lemmy.world -4 points 10 months ago (2 children)

What's that "F" behind the number? Does it stand for "F"uckinghelliamlivinginacountrywithouthealthcare?

[–] vrek@programming.dev 0 points 10 months ago (2 children)

You don't know that. I could live in Belize or Montserrat or even the Turkish Republic of Northern Cypress...

[–] BiggestBulb@kbin.run 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Wait, Belize uses Fahrenheit? I can't Belize it!

[–] vrek@programming.dev 2 points 10 months ago

I just did a Google search of countries that still use Fahrenheit and found this https://a-z-animals.com/blog/discover-the-countries-that-use-fahrenheit-for-measuring-temperature/

[–] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

the Turkish Republic of Northern Cypress

🤨

[–] vrek@programming.dev 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Fair enough, and the article clarifies it but as a standalone name drop it was kinda weird to see.

[–] vrek@programming.dev 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I am from the USA and I agree with the other poster that our Healthcare is crap. That said it annoying to see people bring stuff like that up in topics completely unrelated. Especially it's not like we have a choice where we were born and most of us only have limited abilities to change Healthcare system through votes.

It would be like saying "what's the u in colour for? U are never getting back your plundered treasures we stole?" to somebody in England asking about learning to paint.

[–] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 1 points 10 months ago
[–] AmidFuror@kbin.social 0 points 10 months ago

What a silly thing to get hung up over.