this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2023
261 points (97.1% liked)

politics

19097 readers
3903 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

As with the speech in 2020, Mr. Trump’s remarks have been criticized by historians, Jewish groups and liberals, who said his language recalled the ideology of eugenics promulgated by Nazis in Germany and white supremacists in America.

top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 800XL@lemmy.world 64 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's why he wants to fuck his daughter. He wants to keep the bloodline pure.

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 33 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yes, that's the reason 🤣

[–] TheLowestStone@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago

It's a reason.

[–] Poggervania@kbin.social 49 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

If it acts like a Nazi, and sounds like a Nazi…

[–] SoupBrick@yiffit.net 2 points 10 months ago

But muh both sides!!!!!

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

If it quacks like a duck and steps like a goose…

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee -1 points 10 months ago

If it gives women a little goose and quacks like a Nazi, it's probably Donald Trump

[–] m0darn@lemmy.ca 25 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Isn't he married to an illegal immigrant?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago (1 children)

She's white. So was Trump's Scottish mother. That's always excusable to Trump.

[–] Lophostemon@aussie.zone 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I think most of Scotland these days would tell her to fuck off, were she still alive to boast of her heritage.

She was a hideous racist, and for the most part Scotland these days takes great pride in being inclusive and open to all (except Nazis etc)

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

Oh no doubt. Fred "KKK" Trump wouldn't have married anyone who wasn't a virulent racist. But she was still an immigrant. She was just the "right" kind of immigrant. And white makes right or something like that.

[–] BlackSkinnedJew@lemmynsfw.com 11 points 10 months ago

Little Donnie diapers fascistoid gonna fascist.

[–] NegativeLookBehind@kbin.social 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Can he even spell the word genetics?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

He can't even spell the word 'Hitler,' but that doesn't stop him from quoting Hitler.

[–] magnor@lemmy.magnor.ovh 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

"Yeah I heard that antler guy had some great ideas by the way, great guy antler, tremendous guy."

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 8 points 10 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


In recent months, Mr. Trump has drawn widespread criticism for asserting that undocumented immigrants are “poisoning the blood of our country,” a phrase that he said first in a right-wing media interview and has in the last week repeated on the campaign trail.

As with the speech in 2020, Mr. Trump’s remarks have been criticized by historians, Jewish groups and liberals, who said his language recalled the ideology of eugenics promulgated by Nazis in Germany and white supremacists in America.

In a radio interview on Friday, Mr. Trump again defended his use of the phrase “poisoning the blood.” He dismissed criticism that his language echoed Nazi ideology by saying he was “not a student of Hitler” and that his statement used “blood” in crucially different ways, though he did not elaborate.

Mr. Cheung added, “Only the media is obsessed with racial genetics and bloodlines, and given safe haven for disgusting and vile anti-Semitic rhetoric to be spewed through their outlets.”

On another occasion, he told the same aide that “well, Hitler did a lot of good things,” according to Michael C. Bender, a journalist who is now a New York Times reporter, in a 2021 book about Mr. Trump.

Mr. Trump first directly addressed the comparisons between his remark and Hitler’s comments on Tuesday at a campaign event in Iowa, where he told hundreds of supporters that he had “never read ‘Mein Kampf.’”


The original article contains 1,196 words, the summary contains 233 words. Saved 81%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] Facebones@reddthat.com 7 points 10 months ago

I've stopped cutting conservatives slack on this shit. Republicans are running on nazi ideals using nazi language.

You. Are. Voting. For. Nazis.

"I'm voting Republican for __________, not culture wars!" (for the economy, against Biden, etc)

Cool, then you're saying that nazis are fine as long as you get your perceived niche thing.

[–] Drusas@kbin.social 4 points 10 months ago

Mr. Trump was talking publicly about his belief that genetics determined a person’s success in life as early as 1988, when he told Oprah Winfrey that a person had “to have the right genes” in order to achieve great fortune.

Well, he is inadvertently half correct there. It's not about the genes specifically but about who your parents were. As demonstrated by Trump himself.

[–] commanderbalok@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)
[–] WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] silence7 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's already a gift link, so people shouldn't be hitting the paywall at this point

[–] WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 10 months ago

It may have been an error with the safari reader view, but I hit a “sign in to read more” line and just quickly popped the link into archive.is to get passed that. Shared it in case others saw the same, but again, it may have just been a glitch with reader.

[–] commanderbalok@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)