this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2023
156 points (96.4% liked)

politics

18883 readers
3590 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Come January, the GOP will control every elected statewide office in Louisiana after Republicans swept three runoff races for attorney general, secretary of state and treasurer Saturday night.

The GOP success, in a state that has had a Democrat in the governor’s office for the past eight years, means that Republicans secured all of Louisiana’s statewide offices for the first time since 2015. In addition, the GOP holds a two-third supermajority in the House and Senate.

Liz Murrill was elected as attorney general, Nancy Landry as secretary of state and John Fleming as treasurer. The results also mean Louisiana will have its first female attorney general and first woman elected as secretary of state.

Saturday’s election completes the shaping of Louisiana’s executive branch, where most incumbents didn’t seek reelection and opened the door for new leadership in some of the most powerful positions.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gibmiser@lemmy.world 183 points 10 months ago (5 children)

So now that democrats are no longer a problem, Louisiana is going to become a thriving bastion of freedom and unprecedented economic growth because of the laws and policies that republicans are going to implement to help everyone... right? Right??

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 108 points 10 months ago (3 children)

The dog has caught the car. Let's see what he does with it.

[–] flipht@kbin.social 78 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Same as last time - undoing the budget surplus, massive tax giveaways to oil and gas, and shutting off the tap to anything that helps anyone who doesn't give campaign contributions. Last time, they closed all of our state hospitalsand laid off large swathes of the state work force, and bankrupted the state's employee insurance fund. This time, I am willing to bet they gut the emergency fund at the first opportunity.

[–] SoylentBlake@lemm.ee 12 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Neoliberalism doesn't build, it extracts.

Societies that don't build don't stand for long, and then are forgotten by time because they left nothing to show for themselves.

[–] SCB@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (17 children)

MAGA Republicans are basically the opposite of neoliberals.

Also the idea that neoliberalism "doesn't build" makes no sense at all

[–] trashgirlfriend@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

economically republicans are mostly neoliberal

what are they in your opinion?

[–] SCB@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

MAGA is grounded on protectionist, anti-immigrant isolationism. Those three things are all inimical to neoliberalism

[–] trashgirlfriend@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

How much of that is rhetoric and how much of that is actual policy though

[–] SCB@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Well Trump blew up NAFTA, imposed immigration restrictions based on nationality, wants to end US involvement in NATO and the UN, pulled money out of the WHO, and also pushed for significant tariffs that started a trade war, so all of his actual policies are the opposite of neoliberalism

[–] jasondj@ttrpg.network 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Didn’t he replace NAFTA with the CUM Alliance or some such, and it was basically the exact same thing but with Trumps name next to it instead of Clinton’s?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 10 points 10 months ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] itsonlygeorge@reddthat.com 10 points 10 months ago

This will end well.

[–] SuiXi3D@kbin.social 39 points 10 months ago (6 children)

Just look at the last thirty or so years in Texas for your answer.

Everyone I know is miserable and sees no way out.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Frog-Brawler@kbin.social 4 points 10 months ago

I mean, they already have the highest rate of inflation in the U.S…

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Jaderick@lemmy.world 40 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Imagine being as stupid as Louisiana lol

[–] AlecSadler@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

Welp, Louisiana-stupid is now being added to my daily use. Thank you.

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 32 points 10 months ago (2 children)

This article feels like it's trying to spin things into something less than Republicans restoring the hold they had in a state that has been predominantly Republican for a very, very long time.

[–] die444die@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago (2 children)

As someone who has lived in Louisiana for a long time , it used to be MUCH more balanced than it is now. We had democratic governers and state senators. It has inched further and further right over the past few decades, and they’ve run off anyone worth enough sense and money to get out of this shithole. The election results have been terrible this year and honestly I blame the Louisiana Democratic Party which seems to have either fallen apart or sabotaged our candidates this year by doing absolutely nothing and ceding control to the republicans. My friends and I all went and voted but there’s basically no uniting force in the Democratic Party here to even attempt to get the truth out anymore. Just hatred and stupidity running rampant now is what it feels like.

[–] babboa@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

The LA Democrat party leadership has been a lethal mix of inept and corrupt for a while now. I would argue John bel Edwards won in spite of rather than due to their assistance. There is a rumor floating around (not confirmed) that they hosted a fairly large fundraiser for Shawn Wilson (ostensibly to funnel whatever they raised into his ongoing gov campaign) and then just pocketed the money. Given that the former dem party chair Karen Carter Peterson just got sentenced to 22 months in fed prison (on the day of the primary no less) for helping herself to campaign money, that seems more plausible a story than it might otherwise. Seriously, who is going to throw their hat in the ring for ANY statewide office if that's the kind of support you can expect for your flagship candidate? And then you get to get your veto overridden by a repub supermajority ? Nah, way less stress to just stay in a lobbying job somewhere. Say what you want about Karl Rove and co, but the state level elections were where he and his cohort of repub strategists focused quite a bit of effort grooming candidates since the late 90s and it has continued to pay dividends for them.

[–] 6daemonbag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 10 months ago

The Democratic party is an absolute mess here. They practically don't exist.

[–] Kbin_space_program@kbin.social 5 points 10 months ago

Well yeah, GOP and corporate media policy is to always shift blame for the results of GOP policy to anyone else.

[–] zcd@lemmy.ca 30 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Step 1: Be the butthole of America (Outside of Florida)

Step 2: Go all in on the team that got you there and are very vocal about keeping you there

Step 3: ???

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 12 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Step 3: Choose fascism, because obviously, it's voting that got you into this mess. (/s)

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Don't laugh, I've heard this argument being made. "Why should I waste my time voting when the only candidates are all shitheads? Just go ahead and put whoever you want in office and quit wasting my time. It's not like it matters anyway."

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 2 points 10 months ago

I have, too. The problem is, that's extremely lazy and privileged. It's lazy, because the candidates aren't identical; one is superior, even if only by a little. Progress happens incrementally, not all at once.

It's privileged, because they can't be bothered to do even the basic level of research to discover those differences. They'd rather paint both candidates with a broad brush, call it a day, and assume they'll be able to go on with their life as before no matter who wins.

But these candidates, from the school board to the presidency, vote on laws and policies that affect their life every day. They choose projects to fund and judges to interpret the law. Our votes matter, because there's an entire party spending an inordinate amount of effort trying to suppress the ability to vote.

If you meet someone like that, tell them they're a privileged asshole for thinking that preventing theofascism is somebody else's problem.

[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Those who are able need to vote with thier feet.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago (3 children)

While you're not wrong, that's really going to suck for the folks who aren't able to leave.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

In fact, it will make it less likely that things will ever stop sucking for those who aren't able to leave.

[–] AlwaysNowNeverNotMe@kbin.social 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Suck worse than waiting for the next Katrina?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 3 points 10 months ago

I think they already did.

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 15 points 10 months ago (1 children)

In case you had any doubt, abortion is also banned there.

[–] Seasoned_Greetings@lemm.ee 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

A ban on drag is coming very soon. And the whole "don't say gay in schools" thing. And writing slavery out of curriculums. And criminalizing trans operations. Oh, and gerrymandering.

These are all things our legislative branch tried to pass that our democratic governor was able to keep at bay. We're about to turn into Florida.

[–] Black_Char@kbin.social 14 points 10 months ago

Add to the list of states I'll never go to

[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 10 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I look forward to seeing the voter turn out and that 70% of the population didn't vote because it's hard, they don't have time, yada yada yada, bitching begins after they see them strip the entire state of anything remotely good.

Edit: So close. 65% of the eligible voters sat on their ass. Enjoy the government you chose through your inaction.

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 8 points 10 months ago

Welp, guess I’ll never see Mardi Gras before New Orleans is swallowed by the sea.

[–] Landsharkgun@midwest.social 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

So when do we march south again?

[–] bingbong@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 10 months ago

Sherman shall rise again

[–] Heikki@lemm.ee 8 points 10 months ago

Let me guess... they campaigned on fixing the socialism and the sheeple will continue to elect them because sheeple logic.

I live in TX. GOP has had control for about 30 years and always campaine on fixing the broken system created by the other side... its sad

[–] harry_balzac@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

So, cops are going to get exemptions from local property taxes? I'm not as upset about firefighters and EMS getting it but still... it'll be a good excuse in a couple of years, at most, to raise property taxes on those who can't afford to move to a better state.

[–] jayrhacker@kbin.social 8 points 10 months ago

Literally making them landed gentry who are above the law.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

This is exactly why it's Louisiana though.

[–] itsonlygeorge@reddthat.com 2 points 10 months ago

Sounds like this was a test run of what is to come.

load more comments
view more: next ›