this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2023
1762 points (94.7% liked)

Political Memes

5415 readers
2814 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MisterMcBolt@lemmy.world 92 points 1 year ago (4 children)

“Also, there is no way that the gun was a part of this crime! Guns don’t kill people. Only the mentally unstable people we goad into mass shootings with the weapons and ammo we sell them kill people.”

[–] chaogomu@kbin.social 40 points 1 year ago (1 children)

*Weapons, ammo, and an ideology built on hatred.

Most mass shooters are right-wing nutjobs.

[–] DanglingFury@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] BarrelAgedBoredom@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DanglingFury@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

To play devil's advocate (and weather the downvotes for doing so), alcohol doesn't drive drunk, and most people who use it do so responsibly.

If a bunch of peeps who don't drink wanted to stop drunk driving, they would see the best solution as just banning alcohol. Its a simple solution and makes sense. Nations like saudi arabia have banned alcohol and have significantly less drunk driving incidents. It wouldnt make sense to them why so many people would resist such a simple and proven solution. If they won't ban it all then atleast ban the liquor, etc.

Meanwhile the people who drink responsibly wouldnt want to have to give up drinking just because a few idiots drive drunk. They would see the best solution as finding ways to stop people from choosing (or being able) to drive drunk, while still allowing themselves to use it responsibly, but that is a much harder thing to do.

[–] Jimmyeatsausage@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago (17 children)

Maybe we should have licensing and registration requirements for guns like we do cars... nobody on the "guns aren't the problem" side of the argument is ok with anything like that either.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Of course, it's illegal to buy alcohol under 21, and it's illegal for someone to sell it to you if you're obviously impaired. We have some restrictions about it.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 67 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Pfft these kids don't even know what kind of guns they're being killed with...

-conservatives

[–] Comment105@lemm.ee 28 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Also, it's worth noting that he would be just as dangerous with a knife or a car or a bow.

-also conservatives

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] penquin@lemm.ee 44 points 1 year ago (3 children)

He forgot the thoughts and prayers, the best help they'll ever offer.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago

"By hiding from the guy and not letting him shoot you, you're infringing on his 2nd amendment rights, so who's the real monster here? Ok bye"

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 40 points 1 year ago (12 children)

Haven't we had many records of "good guys with a gun"

Who pull out their weapon and then either get shot by police who mistake them for the shooter or put it back because they can't tell what's going on in the chaos?

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago (56 children)

Your cries for help are meaningless if you can't tell the difference smh

[–] VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf 29 points 1 year ago

Judging by her educational history and political present day, I'm guessing she's not fond of being lectured or otherwise informed by anyone about anything.

[–] quaddo@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (7 children)

They could call it a "fnorplgleek" for all I care.

Until they figure out how to prevent any and all fnorplgleeks from having the ability to injure, main, or kill another human being when the fnorplgleek operator wishes to harm you unlawfully, they can expend 100% of their thinkbox time figuring out how to do so. Like, pin their wetware CPU to working out a solution. Interconnect them Borg style.

If the response is "well no, not like that" then we recognize that it's a compromise that continues to put victims in front of said fnorplgleek operators.

brb getting a "Down with fnorplgleeks" t-shirt made

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago

Because knowing the names of things = knowing safety?

load more comments (53 replies)
[–] lobut@lemmy.ca 33 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (78 children)

Just don't mention assault rifle, you'll trigger someone.

(I got one!)

load more comments (78 replies)
[–] IWantToFuckSpez@kbin.social 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] r3df0x@7.62x54r.ru 15 points 1 year ago (8 children)

The GOP are a bunch of rinos who support the second amendment but.

They instantly support gun control the moment a group they don't like gets interested in guns.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thots and Prayers!!!! Ok!!!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (22 children)

I know so many people who think they are helping by critiquing like this when they are not. And also expect a “thank you” for their destructive distraction. If there were a hell I hope they are the first to burn or freeze in it.

load more comments (22 replies)
[–] dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I take your point loud and clear.

Aside:

It is worth being conversant and properly educated about the things that are important to you if you want to engage meaningfully with people who disagree. That means knowing the vocab, syntax, and lingo.

For example, if you hate manga / anime / Japanese character retardation like I do, it's worth knowing the difference to tell people it's stupid on their own terms.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›