this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2023
323 points (95.8% liked)

Linux

48118 readers
669 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Yet another win for Systemd.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Satelllliiiiiiiteeee@kbin.social 66 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Target disk mode is fantastic, I'm thrilled to see this coming to Linux

[–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

It's a nice feature. I used it a few times on old Macs with external FireWire hard drives for booting a different OS or troubleshooting.

[–] stardreamer@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Worked in IT, target disk mode is a life saver when you have to recover data from a laptop with a broken screen/keyboard/bad ribbon cable and don't want to take apart something held together by glue.

[–] loaExMachina@sh.itjust.works 33 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Soon we'll be debating whether we call it systemd/linux or gnu/systemd.

[–] MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm happy that this is coming to linux (I believe Nutanix has a great method to expose storage over IPs), but I would have liked if this was a bit more project/dependence agnostic.

[–] Kata1yst@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean, it specifically is giving support for booting disks over an existing protocol to systemd. That's pretty well within scope?

[–] MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Oh, my gripe is not with Poettering creating a systemd service for it (for I cannot dispute that systemd wrappers such as this does make life somewhat easier), but I would have liked perhaps a more distribution agnostic method of running NVMe-TCP in a way that the OS would not have to be booted. I suppose I do understand the community's support for this: systemd is used by most of the popular distributions, and writing a service in it will enable systemd to maybe interleave this between other processes and perhaps fulfill the goal of producing a block device on an L3 network without booting userland.

As one can probably surmise, I do not have a great understanding of how the process works - will have to figure out how MacOS did it first, and then about how Poettering implemented it. I think I'll have a better idea of what the solution is geared towards.

Thanks for your comment!

[–] patatahooligan@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I would have liked perhaps a more distribution agnostic method of running NVMe-TCP in a way that the OS would not have to be booted.

From the pull request:

This all requires that the target mode stuff is included in the initrd of course. And the system will the stay in the initrd forever.

I think that's as minimal a boot target as you can reasonably get, or in other words you're as far away from booting the OS as you can get.

So now the question is whether this uses any systemd-specific interfaces beyond the .service and .target files. If not, it should not take much effort to create a wrapper init script for the executable and run it on non systemd distros.

[–] MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Thanks, that makes it easy to understand. Indeed, it doesn't seem very dependent on systemd, which is great. I was aware that the project existed, and for a second thought that Poettering was trying to integrate it directly within systemd somehow whilst making improvements to it. I suppose that's not the case, which is good.

And you're correct, that is probably the easiest way to boot the minimum required resources.

Thanks.

[–] stella@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

"Magic was meant to serve men, never to rule over them."

Pragmatism > all else.

[–] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 25 points 1 year ago

Oh, another arm growing.

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 year ago

This seems like a win for almost all distros

[–] ramble81@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yay, yet another storage protocol over the network.

[–] TCB13@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not a storage protocol over the network, but yes :P

[–] ramble81@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

“ via NVMe-TCP (in case you wonder what that is: it's the new hot shit for exposing block devices over the network, kinda like iSCSI…”

So….?

[–] maryjayjay@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

The protocol already existed. This made it convenient to boot from it

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Link to the post (for accessibility and follow-up in the thread): https://mastodon.social/@pid_eins/111324093735348164

Pull request: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/29748

[–] iamak@infosec.pub 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] smo@lemmy.sdf.org 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

"target disk mode", which this claims to be taking a lot of inspiration from, pretty much turns your computer into an external harddrive - so you can connect another machine to it for direct access. This appears to be trying to accomplish the same, but over the network.

If you've ever stuffed up a machine so badly that the best idea you could come up with, was to take the harddrive out and work on it from another machine - this pretty much allows you to do that. But instead of taking the drive out and putting it an external drive enclosure, you just ask the stuffed up machine to act as the external drive enclosure.

[–] kalessin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Great answer

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] callyral@pawb.social 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

same, i have no idea what any of that means and i use runit

[–] voidskull@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

runit gang !

[–] immibis@social.immibis.com 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@TCB13 @linux Everything is systemd in the future. This has nothing to do with systemd. It could as well have been called targetdiskd.

[–] TCB13@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You assessment isn't entirely correct as this is indeed related to systemd. Read the PR https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/29748

[–] immibis@social.immibis.com 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

@TCB13 services aren't systemd-related just because they are launched by systemd.

[–] winterayars@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 year ago (5 children)

A service by itself shouldn't be systemd, it should be implemented separately and run under systemd. However, this is using the systemd target subsystem which is a little more specific.

[–] TCB13@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Exactly my point. Thanks.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] lemann@lemmy.one 14 points 1 year ago

From what I see in the repo, this functionality is being built into systemd (in the same vein as something like systemd-resolved), and introduces a new target dedicated for the new feature.

Sure, you could probably rip it out and use it with your own init system, but that seems tedious to now scour the documentation to ensure your init system brings up the 'dependencies' launched at the preceeding systemd targets, so the NVMe TCP service can run.

Would be easier to just use another existing implementation IMO, most people running their own init systems probably want more than the bare minimum featureset offered by the services included in systemd's package

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MonkCanatella@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is this like booting over pxe? Is nvme tcp widely supported on motherboards?

[–] TCB13@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago (4 children)

No, this has nothing to do with your motherboard. Once you reach the boot menu you'll be able to pick your OS and alternatively systemd-storagetm. If you chose the the latter then your disks will be available to other machines over NVME-TCP. Just like Apple.

[–] devfuuu@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The problem of keeping comparing and doing analogies with apple shit stuff is that many of us have no idea what tech of magic apple does, so saying things like "just like apple" is a completely useless phrase that gives zero info whatsoever about anything.

[–] lemann@lemmy.one 7 points 1 year ago

It's probably why we're getting the tech almost 20 years late. Apple started doing this with FireWire

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So I could mount and chroot over TCP to fix problems? Looks a little more complicated at this point than fstabbing an iscsi target, but I imagine that'll improve. https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_enterprise_linux/9/html/managing_storage_devices/configuring-nvme-over-fabrics-using-nvme-tcp_managing-storage-devices

Sweet.

[–] TCB13@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

The PR aims to make it easy and simple.

[–] Strit@lemmy.linuxuserspace.show 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So when it's booted it will just advertise the storage to the LAN over nvme-tcp protocol?

[–] TCB13@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Not "booted", you won't be booting your full OS. It's just an option on the boot menu that launches systemd and a small program that does the magic and nothing else.

But is it running at the same time as a an OS or is it just a device without an OS running, sharing storage?

[–] psmgx@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

So share drive / simplified NAS, no?

[–] TCB13@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Kind of... but you're directly accessing the hard drive like iSCSI does. Way less latency, no high (and slow) protocols like SMB are used.

NVMe/TCP is an extension of the NVMe base specification that defines the binding of the NVMe protocol to message-based fabrics using TCP. The rules for mapping NVMe queues, creation of NVMe-oF capsules, and the methods used to deliver the capsules over the TCP fabric are described in the NVMe/TCP Transport Specification. By binding the NVMe protocol to TCP, NVMe/TCP enables the efficient end-to-end transfer of commands and data between NVMe-oF hosts and NVMe-oF controller devices by any standard Ethernet-based TCP/IP networks. Large-scale data centers can use their existing Ethernet-based network infrastructure with multilayered switch topologies and traditional network adapters

[–] IHeartBadCode@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

SAN. Not NAS.

[–] db2@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So NAS without any controls. Yay?

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

trivial to set up NAS with minimal overhead, plus you can boot any pc into this once it's standard, which would be nice for rescuing when you fuck something up: rather than fiddle around with rescue mode or digging out the drives you just boot into this mode and access the drives from your laptop or whatever.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MonkCanatella@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

So like, grubd boot menu? And from there I can boot over a location on my nas for example? I set up ipxe a couple weeks ago but it couldn’t load over my thunderbolt to 10g nic. Would this help?

[–] andruid@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

So this is a service aimed at exposing disks as nvme-tcp boot targets on boot of the system? I mean I love it, I wonder if this could be used to help with a chicken and egg problem I've had with building clustered systems easier. So far I either need a running service to host a network file system (like NFS or CEPH), or I need local disks that bootstrap the clustered storage environment.

load more comments
view more: next ›