this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2023
196 points (91.9% liked)

politics

18883 readers
3537 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

“It should not be hard to shut down hatred and antisemitism where we see it. That is a core tenet of solidarity,” Ocasio-Cortez said.

The New York City chapter of the Democratic Socialists of America is facing a political firestorm after the organization promoted a pro-Palestine rally in the wake of Hamas militants’ attacks on Israeli communities.

The group did not organize Sunday’s rally, its leadership said Monday. But several lawmakers with DSA ties are distancing themselves from what was said at the event.

“It should not be hard to shut down hatred and antisemitism where we see it. That is a core tenet of solidarity,” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y) and one of six DSA members in Congress, said in a statement late Monday — her first comments on the rally.

“The bigotry and callousness expressed in Times Square on Sunday were unacceptable and harmful in this devastating moment. It also did not speak for the thousands of New Yorkers who are capable of rejecting both Hamas’ horrifying attacks against innocent civilians as well as the grave injustices and violence Palestinians face under occupation,” she said.

all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 92 points 11 months ago (6 children)

Whenever there's an anti Israel protest, you can guarantee it will devolve into anti Semitism. For some reason you can speak about Palestinians without thinking about their ethnicity and religion but if you bring up Israel the Jew hate jumps out. My wife is Canadian Jewish and has no interest in Israel or politics, but she still gets shit on about Israel, as if every Jewish person on earth is Israeli.

You have to seperate the racism and bigotry from the call to end occupation or nobody will ever listen to you.

[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 72 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I agree, but you have to remember that the Israeli state wants it this way. They want the world to conflate Jewish and Israeli in order to hide their own fascism. And they will drag every Jewish person to their pit if allowed to. Just like Hamas wants to tangle every Muslim into their warped worldview with their holy war bullshit excuse for violence.

[–] alvvayson@lemmy.world 25 points 11 months ago (2 children)

It doesn't help that the pro-Israel factions accuses anyone criticizing Israel an anti-semite, even other Semitic people.

It seems that Jews are the only people that can criticize Israel without being called anti-semite. They get the self-hating Jew label instead.

[–] stolid_agnostic@lemmy.ml 0 points 11 months ago

No. Jews who come out against these actions are “self hating”. You can’t win.

[–] Maeve@kbin.social -2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Serious questions: Semites are Northern African and ??? Wikipedia was less than helpful, including the embedded link about ancient Semites https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semitic_people

[–] stolid_agnostic@lemmy.ml 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Semites are a large group of ethnicities that came about thousands of years ago and still exist today. Two of the largest groups are Arabs and Hebrews.

[–] Maeve@kbin.social -1 points 11 months ago

Yeah, was thinking Palestinians are Semites too. Thanks.

[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 16 points 11 months ago

Tbf that's probably by Israel's design.

The more people are bullied into associating with Israel by antisemites, the more likely they are to hop on the right of return bandwagon.

This is partially because they want their own version of america's demographic life support, partially because they want more settlers, and partially because they still have a SERIOUS chip on the shoulder over how American jews flatly rejected Zionism and the creation of Israel at the outset.

[–] Serdan@lemm.ee 10 points 11 months ago (3 children)

What anti-Semitic things were said at this particular rally? Do you know? Maybe I missed something, but the article seems rather sparse on details.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 66 points 11 months ago (1 children)

This is shit-tier journalism. Who said something antisemitic and what specifically did they say? Without that information this is merely propaganda.

[–] Lileath@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Politico is owned by Axel Springer SE who also own the Bild, a german tabloid that regularly spreads hate about minorities and anything left of center right. Axel Springer also got funded by the CIA in exchange for promoting a pro american mindset.

[–] jackalope@lemmy.ml 14 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Not disagreeing but citations would be nice.

[–] Lileath@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Most of my sources would be in german but most of what I said is mentioned in the wikipedia article and its sources.

[–] jackalope@lemmy.ml 0 points 11 months ago

Who said I didn't speak German?

[–] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Thanks for the info!

[–] blazera@kbin.social 32 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Article has no examples of anti-semitism allegedly at the rally. Criticizing Israel is no more racist than criticizing China for their uyghur genocide

[–] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 18 points 11 months ago (1 children)

This reminds me of the accusations of antisemitism that Jeremy Corbyn attracted during the last election in the UK. I kept asking for evidence of his antisemitism but nobody attacking him could provide anything of substance.

[–] VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

As far as I recall, he attended a funeral where one of the other guests had loose ties to an extremist group.

Some flimsy bullshit like that is why the next general election is going to be a choice between fascism and a feckless centrist party led by a wooden doll that wishes it was a real Tony Blair 😮‍💨

[–] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Guilt by association? I hate that it worked and I hate that people who are sympathetic to Israel would stoop so low.

[–] VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf 3 points 11 months ago

Yeah, I couldn't agree more tbh. I tried, but turns out there isn't a higher level of agreement than "total" 🤷

[–] Xariphon@kbin.social 14 points 11 months ago

Don't you know? The Zionist definition of "antisemitism" includes "literally any criticism of their genocidal apartheid ethnostate, including pointing out that it is, in fact, a genocidal apartheid ethnostate."

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 11 months ago (2 children)

We need about 200 more AOCs <3

[–] Xariphon@kbin.social 11 points 11 months ago

In general, yes, but not based on this.

[–] TAG@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Not really. She is an idealist and visionary. She has an idea for what the future of the country should be, but, from what I have seen, she never gets too deep in the details of how to achieve it. We need people like her to say that we should not be using fossil fuels to power our transportation, but we also need people who can determine how much funding the government needs to provide to put more chargers on public parking, what the fine would be for hogging the parking spot, how many parking enforcement officers we will need to patrol them all, how much the power grid will need to be updated to provide power to the chargers…

Yes, many of the details fall to the executive branch to execute, but Congress needs to allocate funding for it, remove legal barriers, decide on penalties for non-compliance, etc.

[–] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 5 points 11 months ago

People have to create good guys/bad guys to suit their point of view I guess. This time it's not that easy, the picture is not that clear for most. But, the vile animalistic acts of Hamas can't be justified in any way. Now, I expect Israel to be draconian in their approach which will light them up more.

[–] Astroturfed@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It's almost like the Muslims want to exterminate Israel so if you protest Israel they show up and genocide is obviously their goal. Israel sucks but I'd never show up to an anti Israel rally for a reason.

[–] Raikin@feddit.de 3 points 11 months ago

In my experience it strongly depends on the organizers. The latest pro-palestine rally i attended was organized by some leftist organizations in coalition with local palestinians and that rally worked out very well. Some conspiracy nuts with signs how Jews rule the world were told to fuck off by some Antifa guys and everything else went very well. Also no national flags besides palestinian ones were allowed, i appreciated that a lot.

[–] LopensLeftArm@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I was a dues paying member of the DSA until this rally. I refuse to be associated with this kind of disgusting sentiment.

[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The group did not organize Sunday’s rally, its leadership said Monday. But several lawmakers with DSA ties are distancing themselves from what was said at the event.

Sure ya were, bud. Or, shittttt, maybe you were and just not mature enough not to let perfection be the enemy of good.

[–] LopensLeftArm@sh.itjust.works 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The DSA in New York promoted and supported this rally, the fact that they didn't organize the thing directly is meaningless. I'm not associating with this kind of sentiment.

This is not a lack of perfection, this is an abhorrent cheering and support of terrorism against innocent civilians. I can direct my political efforts to the cause of progress without continuing to support a group that thinks that is acceptable.

[–] theuberwalrus@lemmy.world -3 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] LopensLeftArm@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah they did. Denial doesn't change facts dude.

[–] theuberwalrus@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

I usually catch their tweets but missed that you. You are right.