this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2023
160 points (89.2% liked)

Asklemmy

44162 readers
1667 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 71 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Gender equality, education, access to medical care, etc. basically a slightly modified version of FDR’s proposed bill of rights.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] walter_wiggles@lemmy.nz 55 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Hey guys! It's ya boi Walter Wiggles comin at you with a brand new constitution. Don't forget to like comment and subscribe. We're doin a new constitution every week, so leave a comment and tell us what freedoms YOU want to see!

[–] bloopernova@programming.dev 30 points 1 year ago

I so wanted to downvote you because that legit annoyed me lol.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Retro_Unlimited@infosec.pub 40 points 1 year ago (22 children)

Housing should be affordable, and never sold as an investment

[–] Hundun@beehaw.org 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Housing is a human right. Along with access to food, nutrition, healthcare and education.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] neshura@bookwormstory.social 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Companies shall not own Residential Property under any circumstance.

Companies with Vacant Comercial Property beyond a certain time (1 year maybe?) after the last long term Lease (5 years?) have to prove an effort in filling the vacancy or face 20%(?) of the properties value as fine per year of vacancy.

That ought to fix the property market imo. Values debatable but general idea should help fix things.

load more comments (20 replies)
[–] kromem@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago

That it gets reworked every seven years.

A pretty good idea from Jefferson that was just maybe a bit of a mistake to leave out.

[–] Lmaydev@programming.dev 28 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Every citizen has a right to food, water and adequate shelter.

Anything that makes you a captive market cannot be private or has to have a free public alternative.

Things like healthcare, transport, housing, water, energy, internet etc.

Equal rights.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] hellweaver666@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Just the seven tenets of the Satanic Temple:

I empathy toward all creatures in accordance with reason.

II The struggle for justice is an ongoing and necessary pursuit that should prevail over laws and institutions.

III One’s body is inviolable, subject to one’s own will alone.

IV The freedoms of others should be respected, including the freedom to offend. To willfully and unjustly encroach upon the freedoms of another is to forgo one's own.

V Beliefs should conform to one's best scientific understanding of the world. One should take care never to distort scientific facts to fit one's beliefs.

VI People are fallible. If one makes a mistake, one should do one's best to rectify it and resolve any harm that might have been caused.

VII Every tenet is a guiding principle designed to inspire nobility in action and thought. The spirit of compassion, wisdom, and justice should always prevail over the written or spoken word. Crest image by Luciana Nedelea.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] dan@upvote.au 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

All software that's paid for by taxpayers must be open-source, or at least source-visible. I know some European countries are heading this direction (or may already enforce this) which is great.

Actually, let's do that for everything that's funded by taxpayers. If I'm paying for something through taxes, I should be able to see more detailed information about where the money is going and the output of it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] GombeenSysadmin@feddit.uk 18 points 1 year ago (3 children)

All income over $10m per year is taxed at 100%. Foreign and domestic put together.

[–] Conyak@lemmy.tf 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I get where you are going but it would make more sense to be based on a percentage above a living wage or something like that. In 100 years 10 million will be worth a lot less than today.

[–] GombeenSysadmin@feddit.uk 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Maybe start it at 10m and index link it to the average wage thereafter. Make it in their own interests to boost everyone’s wages.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That would get rid of inflation really fast as billionaires try to figure out how to deflate the currency.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)

πŸ€”πŸ€”πŸ€”

Okay, so I have put a LOT of thought into this question, and after reading everyone else's opinions on the matter, I thought I'd share mine. You guys have a lot of good ideas, some of which I didn't think about before. I hope my ideas can inspire similar contemplation.

Okay, here goes:


IN THE NAME OF liberty, truth, justice, cupcakes, porn, and all that is good in this life, We The People of The Motherfucking Galactic Republic hereby establish and ordain this new Constitution, with blackjack and hookers.

Based on the millennia of suffering of ourselves and our ancestors, We The People hereby establish and remind the reader that ALL PEOPLE HAVE BASIC NATURAL RIGHTS that either the government or any organization of people cannot violate, or must enable and adhere to, respectively. We lay out this Constitution to provide a Framework from which the government, organizations and the people can sort out what and how that should be done, and what ways most benefit the people.

We also hereby establish in the name of harmony, justice, truth and goodness that along with RESPECTING AND ENABLING NATURAL RIGHTS, government, organizations and the people must also adhere to certain responsibilities to ensure the best and most positive outcome for the people and to protect the natural rights of everyone involved.


NATURAL RIGHTS

We the People hereby establish this list of Natural Rights we recognize from the start.

We first stress that this list is not exhaustive, and that Natural Rights are not limited to only the contents of the list. As the future plays out, the people will experience situations new to humanity and therefore the Natural Rights of which the people expect the government and organizations to enforce and protect will, by its nature, expand. New amendments to this list shall be done in accordance with the instructions of this here Constitution.

RIGHT #1: THE RIGHT TO HAVE ONE'S PHYSICAL NEEDS MET

The most basic of all Natural Rights is the right to have one's physical needs met by the government and organizations. These rights include, but not limited to:

  • The right to steady and fair access to nutritious and delicious food, and clean, safe, drinkable water.

  • The right to a safe, clean, pestilence-free, and sturdy domicile that will comfortably meet a person's need for shelter, food, water, electricity and homeostasis.

  • The right to access to electricity, including but not limited to power generation for their shelter.

  • The right to access and use all publicly available or published information that has ever been created up to this point and in the future.

  • The right to access and use communications platforms, including but not limited to mail and any electronic communications systems developed before or since, especially Internet and interplanetary/interstellar communications systems.

  • The right to clean, suitably fitting clothing that will meet the wearer's need for protection from the external world and homeostasis.

  • The right to clean, safe, fast and efficient transportation, on all scopes as described later in this Constitution.

No organization and no government can receive or require payment for the fulfillment of any of these aspects of the right to have one's needs met.

RIGHT #2: THE RIGHT TO SAFETY

We The People assert that we live in an objective reality with a natural world filled not only with wonders, but with many dangers, and therefore the government and organizations are mandated to protect, enforce and safeguard the very real need the people have to maintain and protect themselves, each other, their communities, nation and species.

These rights include, but not limited to:

  • The inalienable right to use lethal or non-lethal force in self-defense and defense of other people in life-threatening situations, whether those situations be immediate, or long-term such as domestic abuse, stalking or harassment.

  • The right of all individuals to own weapons.

  • The right to access and receive combat training, including in the use of weapons.

  • The collective right to own ordnance for all communities.

  • The collective right to form militias and militaries, and to give combat training access to all individuals in a community.

  • The right to secure one's domicile against all forms of attack, whether foreign or domestic

Weapons are defined as:

  • any instrument or device for use in attack or defense in combat, fighting, or war, as a sword, rifle, drone or cannon, that can be held and operated by a single individual. Explosive devices equal to or less in power than a stick of TNT are also included.

Ordnance is defined as:

  • any vehicle designed for military or combat use, including but not limited to tanks, ships, airplanes, or spaceships; large weapons that require more than one individual to operate; explosive devices more powerful than one stick of TNT; bioweapons; nuclear, relativistic (such as asteroids or missiles deliberately launched toward another) or antimatter weapons. Note that individuals are explicitly ALLOWED to have vehicles NOT designed for combat use as defined here. No government or organization can declare a clearly not combat-designed vehicle as one.

FOR THE safety, protection, provision, and betterment of the people of The Motherfucking Galactic Republic, the government is mandated to have and operate A SPACE PROGRAM, to be given no less than 10% of the federal government's gross earnings (whether they be taxes, direct revenue, however the hypothetical government makes money).

This space program must do, bare minimum:


And that's as far as I've got. The Motherfucking Galactic Republic is obviously just a filler name; I don't know if any of these ideas would ever be implemented but they could be used for any new nation, so...

[–] dotslashme@infosec.pub 17 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Okay, I'll start with a basic one. Equal rights for everyone, regardless of beliefs, physical traits, emotional traits, sexuality or financial situation - will probably need amendments since it's hard to come up with every possible circumstance.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] VinesNFluff@pawb.social 17 points 1 year ago (29 children)

The entire body of the state, be it executive, legislative, or judiciary should have a youth quota.

Like say at least 60% of members must be 40 or under.

People over 50 are fundamentally incapable of comprehending the modern world and because they won't have to live in the world they are building -- They are more than willing to sacrifice us all to guarantee their own.

Full disenfranchisement of the old would be reckless, but a quota? Yea.

load more comments (29 replies)
[–] StunningGoggles@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Convert the date format to yyyymmdd on all official government documents.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] sunbeam60@lemmy.one 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Political parties are outlawed. Every MP should represent their own view, not tow a party line dreamt up by a PR agency.

Your vote affects others (like driving, owning a gun etc put others at risk). To vote you must pass a test; to pass the test we offer free education. To enable you to attend this education, we offer you a universal basic income. The test must not discriminate based on gender, age, sexual orientation, income etc etc.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (8 children)

All laws must be beneficial to all the children of the next 9 generations.

All laws that aren't part of the constitution, or charter have a 20 year sunset date.

[–] noqturn@lemm.ee 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I agree in principle, but this is practically unenforceable. How do we determine as a society what will be beneficial in 9 generations, and agree?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Peaty@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago

How would that be determined?

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] xkforce@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (15 children)
  1. Environmental protection, LGBT and womens' rights including bodily autonomy would be explicitly written into the constitution

  2. The 2nd amendment would be rewritten to protect the right to self defense not the right to own enough guns to start a war.

  3. Our first past the post voting system would be replaced with alternatives that do not degenerate into a 2 party system.

  4. The electoral college and senate would not exist. House representatives would be allocated based on population.

  5. Supreme court justices would no longer be lifetime appointments.

  6. If there is a minimum age to serve in government, there will be a maximum age as well.

  7. The US will be obligated to abide by promises and treaties made with Native Americans.

  8. The president is no longer required to have been born in the US. The requirement that the president be a natural born citizen was meant to prevent foreign powers from gaining control during a tumultuous time in US history that is no longer relevant.

  9. Slavery would no longer be allowed for any purpose. (Currently it is legal in many states as a punishment)

  10. A wall of separation between church and state as well as the right to privacy would be explicitly written into the constitution. (The right to privacy is implied but not explicitly stated)

  11. Qualified immunity for police and other monopolies of violence would be abolished.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] TrismegistusMx@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

No human has any rights that they would deny to others.

[–] not_amm@beehaw.org 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Note: I used Community of Earth in case we discover other species, but I'd suggest changing the name according to the interplanetary travel and expeditions

I'm not an expert, but I propose the following:

First and most important

  1. Every individual, from any background and in accordance of the Community of Earth, has the right to the following:
  • a) To Housing in good living conditions, according to the Fourth Right rights and obligations
  • b) To Food
  • c) To Water
  • d) To Access of all public knowledge and knowledge funded completely or partially funded by the Community of Earth
  • e) To a Well-cared-for environment
  • f) To Migrate or Immigrate to any place in or out-of- the Earth
  • g) To reliable, well-cared-for, efficient Public Transport and any transport, in the conditions mentioned below
  • h) To Demand their personal data be protected and used only in the conditions mentioned below
  • i) None of the rights and obligations declared above can be overruled, modified or eliminated without the consent of the 100% of the population of the Community of Earth.
  1. Every individual has the right to be recognized by any entity, organization, individual or any group of individuals that need to use their information
  2. Every individual's identity and characteristics can't be damaged, abolished or affected in any way that invalidates their right to be recognized as they wish
  • a) All individuals and groups of individuals have to follow consent obligations, which can't be abolished nor modified unless they have the recognition of the entire Community of the Earth
  • b) There is no way, path, reform or modification that may affect the rights of the Community of Earth to vote
  1. All the individuals have the right to form organizations, which may be completely transparent in their financial background and members.
  • a) Organizations proclaiming an expert base to have a vote in knowledge or educational background have to adhere to the Second Right obligations and rights.
  • b) Organizations proclaiming an expert base to have a vote in the Community of Earth decisions have to follow the Third Right
  • c) Organizations can be overruled and stop being recognized according to the Community of Earth decisions

Second. Right of decision making for the Community of Earth

  1. Expert entities are those that have an extensive, recognized and valid knowledge recognized by the Community of Earth, in the area they intend to be recognized as experts
  2. Any organization participating as an expert entity for the Community of Earth, included but not limited to: Rights, Economics, Knowledge, Spacial, Exploring, Architectural, Transport and other kinds of entities that may affect the Community of Earth as a whole have to adhere to the following rights and obligations:
  • a) Decisions have to be based on facts. Decisions can't be influenced by religion, moral, personal or any other kind of influence that is not based on facts.
  • b) Decisions and propositions have to be completely open to the Community of Earth, if hidden, organizations are subject to the Sxith Right rights and obligations.
  1. Any organization, participating as an expert entity for the Community of Earth as stated above, can't choose, propose nor influence individuals or groups of individuals without the knowledge of the Community of Earth. Otherwise, they may be subject to the obligations stated in the Sixth Right
  2. Any organization, participating as an expert entity for the Community of Earth has to use standardized, free and open source software and standards according to the Community of Earth.

Third. The right of Knowledge

  1. Any organizations proclaiming educational and knowledge-access base have to be recognized by the Community of Earth
  2. Any school or educational organization may be funded by the Community of Earth, according to the following obligations:
  • a) All facts may be represented as facts, without any modifications and according to ages
  • b) All content may be reviewed by experts recognized by the several educational organizations of the Community of Earth
  • c) All knowledge, described by the several educational organizations of the Community of Earth, may be taught with enough evidence as the several educational organizations of the Community of Earth recognize
  • d) All individuals and groups of individuals, including those following a redemption path, have the right of education and knowledge
  • e) All software, hardware and equipment used with educational purposes has to be completely open to be reviewed by students and the several educational organizations of the Community of Earth
  1. All knowledge has to be based on facts, unless declared and approved by the several educational organizations of the Community of Earth as fictional content, included but not limited to: novels, sci-fi stories, movies, series, stories, myths, etc.
  • a) All knowledge declared and approved as fictional content can't be presented as facts nor used to influence Community of Earth decisions

Fourth. Housing and Living Conditions Rights

  1. Living conditions are decided by the Community of Earth
  2. Architectural and Urban design decisions are made by the several Architectural, Urban Design, Civil Engineer and housing and urban design organizations recognized by the Community of Earth
  3. Every individual may be provided housing with good living conditions, following their necessities

Fifth. Worker's Rights

I mean, the basics and, you know, Marx propositions lol

Sixth. Right of Punishment and Redemption

i haven't decided yet, but the Norwegian proposition sounds good and, with all basics needs met, it may not be necessary to be so strict. But there are still other things to be clear and I already spent too much time writing this

Seventh. Right of Exploration and Transport

  1. Pedestrians and cyclists will always be the priority
  2. Any vehicle that may be sold, interchanged, modified, gifted or any other kind of exchange, designed for private transport, has to follow the following obligations:
  • a) The vehicle has to follow environmental regulations, which are assigned by the several environmental organizations recognized by the Community of Earth
  • b) The vehicle has to follow the security for vehicle passengers and pedestrians regulations assigned by the several urban, environmental and other organizations selected by the Community of Earth
  1. Public and massive transport vehicles can only be acquired after the revision, auditory and recognition of the several urban, environmental and other organizations selected by the Community of Earth.
  • a) All information about the models, contracts, routes and other related information of Public transport, vehicles, software, hardware and other specifications selected by the several urban, environmental and other organizations selected by the Community of Earth has to be completely open to the Community of Earth and provided in an standardized, accessible and free (as in freedom and price) way.

And i don't know, I'm a Free Software advocate so that too has to be considered. Any way, I have more ideas, but not the time

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LrdThndr@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Funnily enough, I had this exact scenario assigned as a project in my political science class in college.

What I came up with is a lottery-based council government. The system is designed with none of the "gentleman's agreements" that the US systems seems to be based on, and assumes that if it's possible to abuse the system, then the system WILL BE abused. So it's designed to minimize the ability for the system to be abused.

You want to get rid of career politicians? Make it so they don't even have the option of running for office in the first place.

Councils

The way my system worked is that all governmental tasks are performed by a council created for a specific purpose. Every council is made up of an odd number of members, with a minimum of 5. Councils can be created to manage a geographical area, such as a state, county, or city, or for a topical purpose, for example, medical oversight. Each council has the ability to create lower councils that report to it, but only within the purview of the parent council. For example, a State Council can create a Municipal Council for a city within the state.

Sitting at the top of the entire structure is the Prime Council, which always consists of exactly 11 members. Decisions of the Prime Council are final except in the case of a supermajority overrule as detailed below.

Lower councils are subject to the decisions of higher councils with one exception - a parent council's ruling can be overturned and vacated if a supermajority* of child councils that existed at the time of the ruling vote to overturn it. For example, if a State Council outlaws gambling, but 75% of Municipal Councils vote to vacate the ruling, it is overturned. But, for example, if a Municipal Council votes to allow prostitution, the state or national council can overturn that ruling on its own. Again, however, this overturning can be overridden by a supermajority of child councils. However, the chain ends there. A parent council CANNOT vacate a supermajority vote passed by the collected child councils. Child councils must have a reason for existing can cannot be created simply to stack a supermajority vote.

A singular case can only be tackled by ONE council at a time and cannot be interfered with during the proceedings by any other council at any other level. For example, if a Municipal Traffic Council is considering a motion to raise a speed limit on a road, no other council (Municipal, State, or even the Prime Council) can interfere in that case or tell the lower council how to rule on it. However, once the case is complete and the ruling announced, THEN a higher council may take up the issue and/or vacate the lower council's ruling.

Decisions of lower councils can be appealed, but a parent council has no obligation to take up the issue and can simply deny the appeal.

Courts

Courts, as we understand them, do not exist in this system, per se. Civil and criminal cases are handled in the same way; there is no separation between the case types. Likewise, there is no differentiation between the natures of the decisions that can be handed down. Every court case is presided over by a council created especially for the purpose of hearing this single case. All the other rules surrounding how councils work detailed the Councils section still apply.

The Lottery

Council members are selected by lottery from all eligible citizens. Each lottery is specific to the seat being filled. To be considered eligible for a given lottery, a citizen:

  1. Must be a member of the geographical area that the seat's council represents. For example, if the seat is on a Municipal Planning Council, the citizen must live within the city.

  2. Must meet the qualifications defined by the higher council when this council was created. In this case, perhaps, qualification requires that the citizen hold a bachelor of science degree in any subject.

  3. Must NOT have previously served on this same council.

  4. Must NOT have been declared unfit for service by a medical professional.

All citizens of legal age are automatically in the lottery pool by default, and the lottery operates on on opt-out basis.

If a citizen is chosen for a council, they have the option of declining the position. In which case, another eligible citizen is selected.

Additionally, a citizen can elect to be removed from the lottery pool for any or no reason for one year at a time. This election can be renewed indefinitely, but it must be renewed UNLESS a medical professional declares that they are unfit for service. An unfit-for-service declaration can be made for a specific amount of time or on a permanent basis.

Antagonistic Resignation

Any council member can resign their position on a council at any time before their term is over. In addition, a council member may enact the right of "Antagonistic Resignation" whereby they remove both themself and ONE other member of the council. There is no veto or override process allowed. To clarify, any council member can remove any other member from the same council by also removing themself at the same time. The replacement council member(s) will be chosen via the lottery.

Antagonistic Recusement

A council member MAY NOT vote on or interfere with the vote on any issue the results of which they may directly benefit from. That is to say that if a council member could personally benefit from a decision on a matter, they are REQUIRED to recuse themself from the case and may not interfere with the case in any way, including but not limited to public discussion or press releases related to the matter.

A council member with a conflicting interest in a single case must either resign from the council or recuse themself from the case. As with Antagonistic Resignation, the recusing council member chooses ONE other council member that must also recuse themself from the case to preserve the odd number of council seats. Again, there is no veto or override process allowed. However, unlike Antagonistic Resignation, the recusing council member MUST choose one other member for recusement - they do not get the option to decline. If the number of active seats on the council would drop below five for this single issue, interim seats will be created and filled by lottery for this specific case only, after which the additional seats will be removed from the council and the interim council members' terms will be considered complete.

Protection and Compensation

Serving on a council is a full-time job and may require taking a sabbatical from work. While an individual citizen has the ability to decline a council seat, NO other entity, individual, or organization may punish or otherwise act against a citizen for choosing to accept the responsibility of service. Therefore, it is considered unconstitutional for any entity to retaliate against a citizen for accepting a council seat, punishable by a fine of not less than 50% of that entity's yearly income. It is understood that this is a harsh penalty, and the severity and calamitous nature of it is intentional and intended to avoid even the outward appearance of impropriety or retaliation. If a citizen CHOOSES of their own accord to decline a council seat out of a sense of duty to an organization, that's allowed, but it is absolutely not acceptable for an organization to demand, tell, ask, or even imply that a seat should be declined.

It is required by law that an employee (and this shall be construed loosely, to include any person who is in any way a member of an organization) of an organization be reinstated at the end of their council service to their same position, pay, benefits, and tenure as though no sabbatical had been taken at all. This is inclusive of any required "re-onboarding" time.

Council members shall be paid the greater of 125% of their reported yearly income or 200% of the average salary of the relevant lottery eligibility pool. This shall be to incentivize citizens to fulfill their duty and serve on a council.

Councilar No-Confidence

At any time, the citizens may petition a geographical council (Prime, State, County, Municipal, etc) for a status of Councilar No-Confidence. This petition shall require the signatures of 55% of the individual citizens of the geographical area represented. Upon submission of a completed petition, the council will be dissolved, and a new council will be chosen by lottery according to all the requirements for the council being replaced. This action is automatic and cannot be vetoed or overruled.

Branch No-Confidence (The Nuclear Option)

If instead, the No-Confidence petition contains the signatures of 75% of the individual citizens of the geographical area represented, the council and ALL LOWER COUNCILS created by it, directly or indirectly, are dissolved and replaced as above. This is akin to pruning a branch from a tree - every branch and leaf connected to the branch is also removed. Note that this applies to EVERY level of the system, so a No-Confidence petition signed by 75% of the citizens of the entire country and submitted to the Prime Council results in the entire system being wiped away and reset.

It went a lot deeper than that, but I've already typed a LOT and think this mostly gets the gist of it.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] HipsterTenZero@dormi.zone 9 points 1 year ago

This document will self destruct in fifty years

[–] LesserAbe@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

No such thing as a non democratic workplace

[–] Bageler@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago

Taco Tuesday

[–] Iron_Lynx@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

To name a few:

  • No official decision may be made without the entire process towards that decision being recorded, documented, and these records be made available to the general public with minimal restrictions. With a specific exception if revealing that information would put more people in danger than concealing it.

  • All natural resources, be it harvested (e.g. ores, oil) or otherwise (e.g. land, air), are property of everyone. If any individual is to monopolise and/or utilise some of these resources, they are to compensate everyone else for doing so.

  • Resources for the public good are to be taken from each according to their ability, and redistributed to each according to their needs.

  • Any supreme office must exist with a hard maximum time an incumbent is allowed to serve.

  • It must be possible for any person holding an official position, including any supreme offices, to be held accountable for their actions in power.

  • All official decisions must strive to be made to materially benefit the greatest number of individual people.

  • It may not be the duty and/or responsibility of government to impose opinions on the general public.

  • In an election, any vote must hold the same weight as any other vote to the greater outcome.

  • Any income and/or net worth for individuals in excess of approximately 1 Billion EUR-equivalent is to be taxed 100% and redistributed among the public, to each according to their needs.

  • Lawmakers are to be compensated an amount directly proportional to the median income of all citizens, and any benefits they receive must be equal to the legal minimum.

  • No wage may be paid that is insufficient for a person to afford a decent existence.

  • No corporation may exist where the compensation of its highest paid member exceeds 500 times the lowest. Any shortfall will be taxed upon the company at 200% the excess, and redistributed across its staff according to their needs.

I wanted to include something that makes the government responsible for some standard of public transit, but I can't seem to get the words right...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] wildcardology@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Don't be assholes to your fellow citizens.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] frazw@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

First No elected official is allowed to take money or goods in excess of 50% of the median salary for all workers in the country in total for the entirety of their time in office from any organization or unrelated individual nor sit on the board of any company following office. Any payments to said official totalling over 50% median salary in the 5 years prior to their election and 20 years after leaving office from a single entity must be declared. The state will provide a generous pension to ensure future employment is not a financial necessity.

These measures are intended to allow elected officials to be free from influence.

Second Any change in leadership of a political party immediately triggers a general election. Change in leadership generally means a failure of the manifesto and/or a change in the policies which were presented to the public when the leadership was elected.

Third No advisory referendum shall be conducted without the intention to act upon the outcome and therefore any referenda should only be acted upon with a super majority of 66%. Prior to action following a referendum, the winning side must demonstrate how the result will be acted upon and where negotiation with outside interests is necessary, since the outcome cannot be known at the time of the first referendum the public should be offered a second referendum to decide whether to accept the outcome.

Fourth Politicians shall be held to account for any lies or dishonesty. Burden of proof lies with the politician accused of misconduct to provide evidence for their claims which are in dispute. Therefore evidence provision at the time of any claims is encouraged and can be published to a publicly accessible repository. Punishments can range from fines to removal from office depending on the severity and frequency of misinformation.

Fifth Proportional representation she'll be enacted to eliminate tactical voting. In addition any changes to the electoral district are subject to scrutiny by a randomly selected jury of 1000 residents in each of the affected areas. Voting by, and identity if the jurors shall be anonymous. The public may request redistricting at any time with a 2 year cool off via a petition meeting a minimum number of 100,000 signatures.

[–] fcSolar@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

I actually started writing up a a new constitution a while ago as a sort of thought experiment. It's not finished yet but some of the highlights thus far include:

  • A unicameral congress, with uncapped membership
  • A right to privacy, free education, internet, and government transparency
  • Freedom from religion clauses
  • Constitutionally limited intellectual property: Copyright is 15 years for corporations, life for individuals.
  • Uncapped supreme court, 2 appointments per presidential term
  • Score voting for the president
  • Proportional representation for congress
  • No term limits
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] dbilitated@aussie.zone 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

government policy will be primarily set by a peer validated group of experts in their fields. funding will be dictated by a multidisciplinary team that assesses need through funding requests by the expert bodies with accompanying impact assessments. that will dictate taxes and so on.

elections will be performative and meaningless as you lot have absolutely shown you can't be trusted but also need to feel heard or you'll break things you don't understand.

[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

peer validate group of expert in their fields

With the restriction that there should be no financial interest in the policy being passed for a committee member.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Using "think of the children" type arguments in political debate should be punishable by loss of passive voting rights (the right to be elected) for life. And the same for "If you have nothing to hide" type arguments.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] arthur@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 year ago (20 children)
load more comments (20 replies)
[–] Susaga@ttrpg.network 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

The wealthiest 10% of people must donate at least 5% of their yearly earnings to a general fund for public welfare, including free food, shelter and medical aid. Business assets domestic and international are included in this calculation. Anyone who attempts to hide assets to avoid donating, even within the confines of the law, can be tried for the manslaughter of everyone who died from poverty that fiscal year.

Essentially, if you have the financial means to help people, you are legally required to.

[–] bleistift2@feddit.de 15 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Why use the term β€˜donating’? You’re describing a tax. More specifically, an income tax.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next β€Ί