A shiv
dotslashme
So if you're "disconnecting" and you spend the first few days just sleeping or staring at the TV, that's pretty understandable. You're paying off a fair bit of "rest debt".
This is actually a very solid point, thanks!
One suggestion: instead of regularly turning off your phone, just permanently put it in silent mode.
These days, I even set it to flight mode and vibration only for notifications, and I usually never check my phone during working hours.
I love to read but have a really hard time choosing a book over television.
Have you tried audio books or podcasts? I usually switch off my screens around two hours prior to sleep and tend to listen to podcasts and audio books until I fall asleep. Important to remember is that the voice of the narrator is super important, so make you get one that make you feel comfortable.
If your energy peaks at a particular time of day, that's when you should plan to exercise.
This is very sound advice and I can't believe I didn't think of it.
I thought we already had this discussion. Just because you can, doesn't mean you should.
No, I still believe the freedom of choice is the more important here. A couple should be free to chose a ceremony that they want, which the church can support or not. The church is a separate entity and like a corporation, they can set their own rules for what they allow or support, as long as it is within the legal framework of Sweden.
My second point is that the church could have had an internal discussion about this, but they (or more likely some indiviuals) have opted to make this internal debate into a political question, inflaming the topic to such a degree that even international media covers it.
They did, but the punishment he received was not really fitting the crime of treason.
https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/beer-hall-putsch-munich-putsch#trial-3
While I agree wholeheartedly with the church making internal policies, but bringing an internal conflict into international media, airing a view that seem rather sensationalistic is what I react to. Having an internal discussion, making a decision and then implement a policy would have been the proper way.
While I agree that the act could be interpreted as an symbol of inequality, I really think personal choice should be the winner here.
I'm going to go with Leopold II of Belgium because of the atrocities this fucker unleashed upon the democratic republic of the Kongo.
Kissinger also come to mind, but he's not been dead long enough to be brought back yet, I think I'll leave that fucker to a generation that doesn't get hypertension just hearing the name.
Thanks for sharing this awesome resource <3
Why do we even care what these tech-bro ass hats think? We already collectively know his vision apply only to "poor people".