this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2023
154 points (98.1% liked)

politics

19107 readers
3130 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) on Thursday flipped her vote on advancing the Pentagon appropriations bill, citing Ukraine aid as the reason for her “no” vote.

Greene had voted “yes” on the rule for the Pentagon bill — which governs debate on a bill and lets the chamber proceed to a vote on the legislation — when it first came up Tuesday.

But the procedural vote failed and when Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) brought it back up Thursday. Greene was one of five conservative Republicans to vote “no.”

“Our country is being invaded by the thousands every damn day and our Department of Defense does nothing,” Greene posted Thursday on X, formerly known as Twitter. “Our Defense bill should not fund our DOD for blood money for the Ukraine war, that’s why I’m a NO. What did we get out of Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, and Afghanistan?”

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky was in Washington, D.C., Thursday to meet with government leaders, including McCarthy and President Biden.

Greene has emerged as one of McCarthy’s strongest allies, but her and other GOP colleagues’ “no” votes on advancing the Pentagon bill dealt a blow to the Speaker and continued a week of turmoil for House Republicans. The chaos includes the failure of this bill and other struggles to advance a House GOP stopgap bill to fund the government to prevent an upcoming government shutdown. McCarthy expressed his open frustration Thursday in the wake of the failed vote.

“This is a whole new concept of individuals that just want to burn the whole place down,” McCarthy told reporters.

Despite her “yes” vote on Tuesday, Greene has long been a critic of Ukraine aid.

“Currently, the top line spending number for the Defense appropriations bill is $826.45 billion,” Greene said on X last week. “The president asked for a top line number of $285.87 million less than our top line.

“The House bill includes $300 million for Ukraine, which I will not vote for. To cut spending and please the members that don’t want to vote for Ukraine, let’s take out the $300 M for Ukraine and pass this otherwise great bill,” Greene continued.

Earlier this year, she offered amendments to an annual defense policy bill to end assistance to Ukraine as it fends off an invasion from Russia.

McCarthy also denied a request by Zelensky to address Congress on Thursday. He said his denial was because there was no time for an address.

“Zelensky asked us for a joint session; we just didn’t have time,” McCarthy told reporters on Capitol Hill, according to videos of the exchange.

all 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FUCKRedditMods@lemm.ee 74 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

This is the best summary I could come up with:

“Shocking cunt shocks with yet more cuntery!”

[–] LarryTheMatador@sh.itjust.works 29 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I dunno, she seems close to the best they can get.

[–] Hippopotamus@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago

I mean , maybe they are?

[–] ares35@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago
[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 48 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This orc bitch is mad that we have South Korea as an ally? That we have a vibrant strong democracy on the Korean peninsula? She's pissed about that? She'd rather North Korea have taken over the entire peninsula? What the f***?

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

deleted by creator

[–] Smokeydabear94@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And the whole thing is irrelevant since our soldiers aren't fighting in Ukraine

[–] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

As far as US interests go, we're getting a bargain to fuck up Russia. We supply funds and armaments, no official bodies on the ground, and Ukraine fights them for us.

The alternative is to let Ukraine fall to Russia (no, cannot let that happen) or we send boots on the ground, which is absolutely not a better option.

[–] bemenaker@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] vanontom@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Expected results of a cult (of millions of very dumb, gullible, low quality people) voting out of spite with no care for anything except cult status and endorsements from dear leaders. It doesn't matter how obviously unqualified the person is for the job, or the quantity of brain-melting gibberish that comes out of their mouth. Idiocracy is here, the mind virus is real, and the grift will only get worse until these literally insane people continually lose elections.

[–] StillNotAHero@artemis.camp 39 points 1 year ago (4 children)

“Our Defense bill should not fund our DOD for blood money for the Ukraine war, that’s why I’m a NO. What did we get out of Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, and Afghanistan?”

Hold on since when were Republicans against the war(s)?!

[–] IonAddis@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

I mean, I've already been pissed about everything for a while, but I keep getting an especial type of pissed when the party whose only useful function was to carry the big stick (war-related stuff) has decided to toss the stick out the window when it's actually needed for once.

It's like...what the fuck. Why am I the one going, "Oh shit, there's an actual enemy over there for once that genuinely needs to be fucking dealt with...and Ukraine's dealing with them, so let's give them some support" and the party that's always been frothing at the mouth to fund more war for the most appalling/greedy/stupid of reasons suddenly turns tail and becomes cowardly.

It's MY job to say "stop participating in wars". It's my job to say "fund medicare for all/support minorities/educate kids/unionize/HELP people/stop killing people!"

Why the hell do I need to do their job too?

I mean, I know what's going on. The cold war didn't stop, it shifted into a phase that took advantage of the internet while we twiddled our thumbs. Greene and others are likely getting SOMETHING in their pockets in exchange for being domestic propaganda-spewers. Greene is Leeroy Jenkins-tanking everything while others do terrible shit quietly off to the side while we're distracted by her abject awfulness.

The English-speaking nations have had propaganda over the internet fracturing and cracking them/us into smaller pieces for years--classic "divide and conquer" tactics, and it's working.

And that's why the GOP's suddenly releasing doves at the most inopportune of times. Because it's opportune for individuals getting money shoved into their hands if they say this or that thing (and good for the ones giving them their lines to say), even if it's a disaster for the nation. When you have money, you can golden parachute away if your home nation starts collapsing.

In before someone jumps in and says, "no it's not foreign propaganda, people are just petty and dumb"...it's fucking both. It's the stupid and cruel 20% that exists in every society being useful idiots for people who want to weaponize them and use them to rip apart a nation. (Or, nations...Trump, Brexit, crap going on in Canada...and I'm sure Australia and New Zealand has seen some stuff too as English-speaking nations, I'm just not familiar with their politics.)

[–] Rodsterlings_cig@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Oh no, Mickey Rourke has got a point, but of course came to the incorrect conclusion.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I hate to say it, but there's nothing ideologically inconsistent about their position. They're all for fighting communists, but oppose fighting fascists (whom they see as allies).

[–] tryptaminev@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

They are embazzled with and paid by Russia. They have no values and they would sell out to China just as happily if it means more money for them.

[–] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 27 points 1 year ago

McCarthy also denied a request by Zelensky to address Congress on Thursday. He said his denial was because there was no time for an address.

Must have been busy sending everyone home. You know, gotta make sure the coffee maker is unplugged, ect.

[–] ZaroniPepperoni@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Very on brand for her to want the DOD to do the job of law enforcement, which would of course be unconstitutional. DOD and DOJ are separate for a reason.

[–] Syringe@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

One of the tenants at work here is that these people don't believe that the Constitution applies to people who are here illegally, so there's no conflict in her head about this

[–] Endorkend@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago

Would be interesting to see if her state happens to be one of those benefiting from the Ukrainian aid the most as factories for ammo and shells are at full capacity since the war started.

Would show she's either to dumb to know she's voting against her own constituents interests or doing so deliberately because she has different masters.

[–] Ekybio@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

I read a few comments on why the warmongering GOP now wants to stop sending weapons. Let me use this opportunity to make something clear:

What we see on display are the real world consequences of what happens when you have Fascists in politics! Here is list of some things Fascism is characterized by:

Logical Inconsistencies: Supporting expansion, use and increasing spending of military complexes and police, but then opposing war, even stopping Pentagon funding. Pro-War people would instead pass a bill firmly cementing funding instead and buy stocks of appropriate companies.

Self-Destruction: Shutting their own Government down, loosing support from agencies and taking a massive optical loss, because they are driven by dogma, ideology and emotion. Or cognitive disfunction and dillusion in cases like MTG.

Diplomatic Incapability: Not only an inability to reach across the isle, but not even getting along with nominally allied people WITHIN THE SAME PARTY!

The GOP used Fascism as soil for growing a base and now they reap the reward.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Oh my. Her arguments show that she was born stupid and never learned a thing. I suggest that her history teacher gives her a good paddling - after all, REPs are all for corporal punishments...

[–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 5 points 1 year ago

Big war going on!

"We just don't have time."

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 3 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


But the procedural vote failed and when Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) brought it back up Thursday.

“Our country is being invaded by the thousands every damn day and our Department of Defense does nothing,” Greene posted Thursday on X, formerly known as Twitter.

Greene has emerged as one of McCarthy’s strongest allies, but her and other GOP colleagues’ “no” votes on advancing the Pentagon bill dealt a blow to the Speaker and continued a week of turmoil for House Republicans.

“Currently, the top line spending number for the Defense appropriations bill is $826.45 billion,” Greene said on X last week.

Earlier this year, she offered amendments to an annual defense policy bill to end assistance to Ukraine as it fends off an invasion from Russia.

“Zelensky asked us for a joint session; we just didn’t have time,” McCarthy told reporters on Capitol Hill, according to videos of the exchange.


The original article contains 442 words, the summary contains 149 words. Saved 66%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!