this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2023
854 points (97.9% liked)

Programmer Humor

32410 readers
509 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mathemachristian@lemm.ee 250 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I already hate people who send voice messages in a world where dictation software exists. I hate whoever even thought of joking about this even more.

[–] maniel@lemmy.ml 96 points 1 year ago (2 children)

But dictation software would omit crucial parts like ummms, coughing etc

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 32 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Dude you’re not thinking about it the right way. We can define a new multi byte character set to help define mood (both speaker and listener), intention, irony, sarcasm, sincerity, bodily functions, and so on. This is a solvable problem.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] LostXOR@kbin.social 18 points 1 year ago

"crucial parts"

[–] lobut@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I have literally given up friendships from people that wouldn't stop sending me voice messages.

I accept it from family, kids, the elderly and such. I just can't believe people want me to turn off my music and slowly listen to your shitty voice when I can easily multitask.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@startrek.website 18 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The dictation software we have is pretty shitty though. It almost always needs proof-read, or re-dictated several times to get it right. At that point you may as well just send an audio clip.

Until the day that dictation software gets it 100% correct, it's not going to be worth my time.

For now, the human on the other end will always have an easier time understand an audio clip than a machine, because human minds are more capable of using context and getting past regional accents.

[–] TheFriendlyDickhead@lemm.ee 21 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Most of the times I get a voice message it could be written in two sentences, but they still decide to make it a two minute voice message. Just a lot of useless stuff added for free

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ______@lemm.ee 125 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Finite@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

But all the extroverted programmers will love it

[–] ActuallyRuben@actuallyruben.nl 44 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] SpeakinTelnet@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 year ago

Except those who convinced the boss that working on-site if for the greater good. Fuck you John, we were happy.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Malix@sopuli.xyz 100 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

but what about programmers with problems hearing? An alternative of webcam video with sign language, pantomime and subtitles is needed!

edit: OOH! Use AI to generate the sign language videos. Could be wild, considering how good AI is at drawing hands.

[–] Haus@kbin.social 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lord_ryvan@ttrpg.network 17 points 1 year ago (3 children)

As a severe hearing impaired developer,

Use AI to generate the sign language videos

hurt me in my fucking soul.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] catherine_fish@lemm.ee 83 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Imagine spending HOURS listening your colleagues comments... I quit.

[–] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You know someone on the team (probably me) that is gonna pontificate TF out of the comment too and you're gonna get a 10 min diatribe on a 5 line function lol

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] snowraven@sh.itjust.works 75 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Right all we are missing now is videos in comments.

[–] dingleberry@discuss.tchncs.de 37 points 1 year ago

This interface is brought to you by World of Tanks!

[–] AngryClosetMonkey@feddit.ch 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Let's turn github into Instagram. Every snippet of code has to be attached to a picture or video...

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Luftruessel@lemmy.world 72 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Looking at how good textual documentation works, it would probably be a 3s long note reading out the method name

[–] UpperBroccoli@feddit.de 39 points 1 year ago

Oh hahaha nooooo, it would be 15 seconds, and it would start with a sigh and deep, troubled breathing noises, a finger tapping the mic and someone saying "is this thing on" before the entirely useless comment even starts.

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

Obviously they should be using syntactically correct JavaDoc format here so the voice messages can be converted to HTML

[–] 39Y523R@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 1 year ago

Don't kid yourself, it would be 15 seconds of swearing followed by 2 seconds of useless misleading info.

[–] tetrahedron@programming.dev 66 points 1 year ago

I am deaf. i already struggle with keeping up with subtitles on tutorial videos of some obscure stuff that has little to no docs. Kindly return this idea to a void function instead and try not to catch the erroneous thread with these satanic proposals.

[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 65 points 1 year ago

I would enable this in my project so I can ban any contributor who submits an MR with it

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 61 points 1 year ago (1 children)

All my comments would just be Rick Astley

[–] Rozauhtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone 36 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Never gonna let = MyVariable down

[–] dukk@programming.dev 26 points 1 year ago

Never gonna MyVariable.run() around

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 57 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Ah yes, source code files that aren't plain text and can only be opened by certain editors, exactly what the software industry needs

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] lauha@lemmy.one 56 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

In reality, an editor could have speech-to-text and it would transcribe the spoken comment into a comment with some tag to indicate it was a spoken comment. Then when an editor encounters such a comment, it would read it out using text-to-speech. For example

// transcript: Holy fuck what is wrong with this stupid code‽ for fucks sake! *inaudible* I've spent hours on this. I'm going to... nevermind it was a semicolon. Undo comment. Remove comment. Cancel comment.
[–] kevincox@lemmy.ml 52 points 1 year ago

The rant comment will be forever changed.

And dare I say improved.

[–] UniDestroyer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 44 points 1 year ago

You are too dangerous to be kept alive.

[–] bort@feddit.de 37 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

why use a resource folder for it, when you can embed a base64 encoding directly into the source file?

[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 year ago

Yes, add this and images and svg to the markdown standard

[–] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 34 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Fantastic idea but I don't think it goes far enough. Why stop at comments? I want to be able to write whole functions and classes like that!

[–] rothaine@lemm.ee 34 points 1 year ago

ffmpeg is now a dependency of gcc

[–] HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 year ago

We should make it like Star Trek where you can create entire holodeck programs with just voice commands.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dreugeworst@lemmy.ml 33 points 1 year ago

Yes please, I would love not being able to scan comments to see if they are relevant to what I'm trying to do

[–] maniel@lemmy.ml 33 points 1 year ago

I also like when people respond to my texts with voice memos

[–] Cryan24@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago

If this existed, I would be summoned by HR after performing my first code review.

[–] ExLisper@linux.community 28 points 1 year ago

Ban this person from computers forever.

[–] peanuts4life@beehaw.org 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

While investigating an uncovered node in some aviation datalink software, I discovered a 15 year old comment from 1993 along the lines of, "this function never runs, I'll fix it later." I wish will all my heart I could have heard their voice. Even if just for a moment.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] fsniper@kbin.social 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I hope this is a joke and not intended to be real.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] zacher_glachl@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

inb4 zoomers unironically want this

[–] itsathursday@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Do you start recording before or after you rage with expletives?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Haus@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago

I adore the energy behind these comments.

[–] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 year ago

Or Base64 inside the comment text

load more comments
view more: next ›