this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2025
192 points (99.5% liked)

World News

39757 readers
5142 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum criticized Donald Trump's executive order to label drug cartels as foreign terrorist organizations, emphasizing Mexico’s sovereignty and rejecting U.S. military intervention.

Trump’s order, part of broader measures on border security, could allow asset seizures and sanctions against cartels but faces skepticism for its effectiveness.

Experts warn it may complicate asylum claims, as migrants paying cartels for passage could face disqualification.

Critics see the move as political posturing, while some victims’ families hope the designation will bring justice and highlight Mexico’s cartel violence.

top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago

Is there any legitimate argument that cartels aren't terrorists? They seem to have successfully terrorized the local population in to compliance. They run militias and have military equipment.

I swear I've seen this movie before. It was based on some book by a guy named Tom... /s

[–] zabadoh@ani.social 48 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Only if they follow up by shutting down gun stores because they're aiding and abetting terrorist organizations by knowingly selling ridiculous amounts of arms that ultimately wind up in terrorist cartel hands.

[–] Skiluros@sh.itjust.works 37 points 1 day ago (1 children)

US authorities didn't even bother prosecuting specific individuals from HSBC's US branch involved in money laundering for cartels, HSBC's US branch only had to pay a fine.

[–] zabadoh@ani.social 12 points 1 day ago

To be fair, $1.9 billion + $665 million in civil penalties is a good sized fine for laundering $881 million (that the Feds know of).

I'm sure HSBC won't make that mistake again, unless the profit motive overrides the risk again.

[–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

do you mean the amount of american guns going over the border?

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 3 points 1 day ago

Experts warn it may complicate asylum claims, as migrants paying cartels for passage could face disqualification.

That sounds like a win-win for the Führer.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Anyone laying odds for how long it’ll take for Trump to decide to invade Mexico? I’d give it two quarters, max.

[–] zabadoh@ani.social 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Predicting he'll call Mexico an "American protectorate" or some other bullshit before/during/after he invades.

[–] dan1101@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If Mexico becomes part of the US at least we'll get rid of a lot of the immigration controversy, right? Right?!

[–] recreationalcatheter@lemm.ee 1 points 1 hour ago

Precisely in the way that electing Trump will stop the Palestinian genocide.

[–] Quill7513 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

it won't be an invasion.

it will be a special military operation.

[–] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

3 days in and out, just like Ukraine.

It's going to be a shit show when the next president takes over and has to get us out of conflicts with all of our neighbors. I suspect in the end we'll end up losing territory rather than gaining any, and we'll be sanctioned to hell by the rest of the world and paying reparations out the ass for generations.

[–] Quill7513 1 points 53 minutes ago

i hope France, Denmark, Poland, and Ukraine are responsible leaders of the free world

[–] skozzii@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Special Freedom Operation.

I mean it only makes sense to own the land with shores on the gulf of America.

Can EU just declare maga as terrorist, then invade us to liberate us?

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Very clever. Very very clever. Labelling them as terrorists gives the US the grounds for invading a country, as it has done before. As Russia did with Ukraine by claiming it's infested with nazis.

Unfortunately it's not clever enough, as some regular dude like me can see right through it. But I guess being more clever is not necessary anymore.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Trump’s order, part of broader measures on border security, could allow asset seizures and sanctions against cartels

In foreign borders?

[–] sulgoth@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago

You make it sound like they haven't done this before.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 9 points 1 day ago

If your country has anyone in it that the US has decided to call "terrorists," better start massing troops.