this post was submitted on 24 Dec 2024
130 points (81.9% liked)

News

23649 readers
3229 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago

Term and age limits for all elected politicians serving all levels. Two terms and 65 is the maximum age to enter the election. In addition, get rid of the Electoral College.

The union members who voted for Putin's Sock Puppet do not realize the damage they are going inflict on the US blue-collar sector.

[–] SuperCub@sh.itjust.works 33 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

The statement reflects the actions of the Kamala campaign and the Dem party, so I believe it. Will Democrats ever change, though? Not until the old guard relinquishes their tight grasp on the party and allows it to operate democratically. The old guard are corrupt and they are paid by the same ultra wealthy donors that pay Republicans. The only reason the Tea Party was successful in taking over the Republican party was that there was a huge amount of funding behind them. An equivalent leftist force does not exist because there is no monied interest that would fund an insurgency on the left (except for the masses— think Bernie 2016, 2020, but we would need even more to create a lasting insurgency of equal scale). In light of this, the Democratic party has continuously pursued a "third way" approach to become essentially Republican with some social equality. The Democratic brand stands for nothing anymore.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

because there is no monied interest that would fund an insurgency on the left

There could be, but in the last 2 decades such companies generally went down or at least didn't grow into something significant and were not being helped by the state and such when having problems. I agree that politics reflect money.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 11 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

The old guard are corrupt and they are paid by the same ultra wealthy donors that pay Republicans.

I don't think it's actually possible to win national elections in this country post citizens united without the ultra wealthy donor class. I'd love to be wrong, but I'm pretty sure I'm not.

Nothing will meaningfully improve until the rich fear for their lives

[–] yesman@lemmy.world 130 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (12 children)

Reminder: this is the same Teamster that spoke at the Republican convention, making these comments to Tucker Carlson.

You probably shouldn't take this at face value and assume this was her attitude toward labor in general.

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 7 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

A major union head went on Tucker Carlson's podcast... gross. Harris could have done more to appeal to workers, but this dude can't paint himself as a neutral politically-impartial leader!

[–] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 52 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

It's bullshit on it's face. Biden told Congress they should pass the PRO Act, Harris echoed that ON THE CAMPAIGN TRAIL.

One of the provisions of the PRO Act is to gut right-to-work laws by allowing Unions to collect dues from every employee at a Union shop.

So the guy is just lying about that, of course there's no way for me to know if she wagged her finger in a Teamster's face.

[–] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 27 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Excuse my ignorance on American doublespeak, but does the "right to work" just mean the "right for companies to employ scabs"?

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 17 points 15 hours ago

They named it that so it would get confused with similarly named laws that protect the rights of workers.

[–] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 18 points 17 hours ago

right to work laws "protect" workers from unions forcing them to pay dues so: yes.

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 6 points 15 hours ago

We could have gotten Right-To-Work off the books?

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] AriesAspect@lemmy.world 9 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

Unless it's aoc or bernies sanders. I'm not voting blue ever again. Actually crazy they** lost to orange, again

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 minutes ago
[–] Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago

It's just shitty because what real alternative is there? You either go all-in on the Conservative fuck-train or you attempt some desperate form of damage control by voting for the moderately more palatable option. There's no in-between in the US that isn't a symbolic losing bet.

[–] MisterScruffy@lemmy.ml 25 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

If the next dem candidate doesnt run as an anti-establishment candidate, and call out the party leaders that have done such a terrible job, they will lose again and again and again etc.

For one thing someone eventually has to admit that Bill Clinton is a creep who should not be praised anymore. The fact that the Kamala campaign used him as a surrogate in 2024 is delusional

[–] AriesAspect@lemmy.world 12 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

Everything about her campaign was delusional 🙄

[–] orclev@lemmy.world 60 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I'm sure one of a great many statements that aged like milk. The sheer contempt that Democrat politicians have for voters is breathtaking. Maybe some day they'll care about voters the way they very obviously care about corporate donors.

[–] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

I don't understand this.

The statement made means "are you with me or not, I'm not going to stop on your behalf"

And generally the campaign trail was pro workers rights, the activism history was for workers rights.

So it sounds like teamsters had something else going on? It seems like this thread is reading it wrong.

[–] CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee 42 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Judging by their performance in the last three presidential elections with absolutely zero course correction, I wouldn't hold my breath.

[–] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 0 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Given the number of people in this thread stating they'll never vote Democrat again I don't expect that to change.

I'm pretty pissed at the system myself but in no way am I going to encourage more Republican leadership. Which is far far worse than what we would get otherwise.

It's really weird to shoot yourself in the foot just to spite your hand.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 20 points 23 hours ago (8 children)

Maybe some day they’ll care about voters the way they very obviously care about corporate donors.

How are you coming away with that the lesson to learn? The guys that won care even less for voters. The lesson appears to be: "Say whatever you think voters want to hear at that exact moment with no intention of following through for their benefit."

[–] hark@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

If that's what it takes to win then they should fucking do it, assuming democrats even want to win.

[–] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago

Most of the thread seems to take this lesson. Which is crazy.

They would literally rather have a pandering candidate who just lies to them to get their votes and then does nothing after then a candidate who is transparent about what they can and cannot do, and pushes realistic change that can actually be achieved within their term.

This country is fucked, because the voter base is comprised of morons. The education system has failed this country and there really isn't any turning back now. If entire generations lack critical thinking ability then they lack the ability to make good choices, and are unable to see past their nose, never mind vote.

[–] AmidFuror@fedia.io 10 points 21 hours ago
[–] orclev@lemmy.world 7 points 21 hours ago (7 children)

That's rather the point isn't it? Republicans lie constantly about everything but those lies are about things their voters want. Democrats meanwhile tell their voters that they'll get what Democrats are gracious enough to give them and be happy they're not as bad as the Republicans. In either case neither party is delivering what progressive voters are asking for. Then Democrats wonder why they have voter turnout problems.

People are sick and tired of showing up to vote for the lesser evil and the result being either things only get very slightly worse or much worse depending on who wins. It's particularly hard for people to justify investing that time and effort when they're struggling to just survive day to day and keep a roof over their head and food in their stomachs.

I and many others tried our best this last election to keep Trump out of office but we can all only do so much when the Democrats are working against us every step of the way. We need an actual progressive running on progressive policies out of the Democrats if they want to win an election, because running as diet conservative isn't cutting it anymore.

People gave Bernie a lot of shit for being a populist but you know what? He motivated people. His supporters were excited to get out and vote for him. Unfortunately he was never given the chance and instead we got the same tired "we'll run on Republican policies from two decades ago" Democrats.

Even Obama, the most "progressive" Democrat in at least fifty years, promised socialized healthcare like the rest of the first world countries have but ended up delivering a watered down half assed Republican healthcare plan instead.

So yeah, people are sick and tired of Democrats that only ever seem to be able to successfully deliver things wealthy corporate donors are asking for.

[–] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Democrats at least in the last cycle told their voters what they can get based on what is achievable during a term.

It was a realistic outlook. It wasn't just lying and pandering.

What seems to be what you would prefer which is absolutely crazy. Why do you want to be lied to just for your vote and then no actual action taken? Somehow that is better than being told what is real and then action being taken on what is possible?

The amount of commentary in this thread that share the sentiment is mind-boggling. If most of the voter base in this country only cares about lip service then this place is well and truly fucked. Nothing can fix that, not within a couple generations.

If this is the case then idiocracy really was a documentary....

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] YtA4QCam2A9j7EfTgHrH@infosec.pub 18 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Seems like the Teamsters would have been better running mates than a fucking Cheney

[–] spacecadet@lemm.ee 0 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Don’t worry, next election they can get Hitler’s grandson or Putins niece to help them campaign. That should get the average everyday person to come out and vote for them! Everyone loves relatives of super powerful war criminals, right?

Honestly, yes they are the best. Especially when their politics aren’t all that different from the mass murderer.

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

The silver lining of 2024 is watching Kamala's entire political career implode from her own hubris. She's now resigned to HRC hot-potato status that only further polarizes the Dem base.

If the Dems had any sense they'd be distancing themselves from her entire campaign, indefinitely.

[–] hark@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Unfortunately the democrats have no sense, which is why they have ghouls like hillary clinton continually floating around in the background even after she lost against a clown and everything she touches turns to shit.

[–] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 1 points 30 minutes ago* (last edited 30 minutes ago)

They have sense- sense to understand that they don't need to win. With the GOP as a boogeyman, they know that even more donations will come in, and they don't actually have to govern, or produce any kind of effective legislation. It's why even when the Dems control the majority of the House, nothing gets done, and why there are always just enough Dems willing to cross to Republican positions to defeat any real progress.

They're just Controlled Opposition at this point, and that probably started in the 90s with Clinton and sucking the Corporate teat with gusto. Even now, we have crones like Pelosi at 84 fucking years old who refuse to do anything other than punch downward at her own party members. The entire party needs to be scrapped.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

The silver lining of 2024 is watching Kamala's entire political career implode from her own hubris

That was the silver lining on her FIRST presidential run, but the DNC didn't let it happen then and probably won't now.

A woman of color representing several different groups of people and who will pretend to be progressive sometimes but always change her mind into whatever the donor-determined party line is?

She's catnip to a Dem leadership desperately trying to compensate for not caring about the working class by pretending that optics equal substance 😮‍💨

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›