this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2024
306 points (98.7% liked)

Not The Onion

12540 readers
430 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] alquicksilver@lemmy.world 58 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Gross. I hope they're graffitied all over before the end of the week.

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 40 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I hope their upper management is eaten before the end of the week

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

"How frightfully rude! I certainly hope somebody stabs him in the eye!"

[–] Delphia@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Stickers that read "A.I cant scrape this off"

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 1 points 1 week ago

Yes I too hope they’re “graffitied”.

[–] imPastaSyndrome@lemm.ee 53 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

I hope that every company that spends money on AI employees spends a lot of money on AI employees and then subsequently loses their shirts when they realize they're practically entirely useless on a business level And then they go bankrupt and the company selling them goes bankrupt because they can't sell garbage

[–] GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org 27 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Depends on the industry. If you're in an industry where your bottom line is sufficiently insulated from the quality of your goods or services, then you'll be fine! Just gotta be an illegal monopoly, or form illegal trusts to gain equivalent monopoly power, or benefit from regulatory capture.

Like, say, health insurance. What could go wrong?!

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 week ago

So what does Artisan actually do? Its main product is an AI "sales agent" called Ava that supposedly automates the work of finding and messaging potential customers. The company claims it works with "no human input" and costs 96% less than hiring a human for the same role.

This company is selling telemarketer stalker bots. I think it will probably do fine.

[–] Not_mikey 6 points 1 week ago

Or an isp, we'll soon be longing for the days when we got to talk to an at&t customer service rep.

[–] MajorHavoc@programming.dev 8 points 1 week ago

Yeah. This is pretty likely, at this stage.

General purpose AI may be coming, but it's not here, now.

Sadly, a bunch of them will just recover by convincing idiots to give them venture capital.

[–] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

Time for some of us to become neo-luddites. Start breaking some machines, because it's not practical to stage large scale strikes when the shops are so distributed.

[–] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 49 points 1 week ago (1 children)

“AI won’t complain about work-life balance.”

Yeah well AI also won’t be a consumer, so in seeking to replace your workers, remember that you are also replacing your consumers. Sowing the seeds of your own destruction.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"but it's just my company! People will find OtHeR wOrK! So it's totally ok!"

Repeated at every company...

The future is going to suck big time :/

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

In my experience, it's often the other way around. They'll say that because everyone else is going to replace certain jobs with AI, they'll have to do it, too, to stay competitive. If they don't stay competitive, they might need to fire workers anyways.

In theory, I could imagine someone employing AI, while from a moral viewpoint supporting a ban of it. One problem is that such a ban would need to be universal for it to not put anyone at a competitive disadvantage, which we can't achieve with national laws.
Well, and the other problem is that most people who argument this way then get massive bonuses and also pay bonuses out to investors, so that completely undermines any potential for morals.

[–] Shapillon@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

The famous race to the bottom \o

[–] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

I made a better crop.

[–] LANIK2000@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

Capitalism is self defeating on so many levers it hurts. Too bad it has to take society with it. Or rather too bad Americans let it run unopposed.

[–] Maxxie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 week ago

Stop hiring artists, photoshop can do it for free 🤨

I work with ai agents, the idea that they can work "without humans" is laughable. Spend 3 hours on a task, or spend 200 minutes trying to make ai produce anything salvagable.

[–] hono4kami 5 points 1 week ago

what's with billionaires trying to make cautionary tales real (Metaverse, etc)

also, to quote some user from Hacker News:

His company, like 9 out of 10 YC companies, is destined to fail. That is all the poetic justice you'll ever need.