Maxxie

joined 1 month ago
[–] Maxxie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 hours ago

good kitties

[–] Maxxie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

This thinking is precisely why Jan 6 happened and will happen again if we validate that thinking by doing it ourselves.

What do you mean validate they don't give a crap. The alt right isn't going to become less relevant because we refuse to use their tactics against them. The choice is do things by the book, keep our precious moral high ground and most likely lose or get dirty and have a fighting chance.

You know what is a humane value? Respecting other people even when you vehemently disagree with them. Acknowledging that they are human beings and have a right to their thoughts and ideas even when you feel they are wrong. Because if you do not you are tacitly agreeing to their thinking that YOU are wrong. You are giving that perspective credence and the harder you push back the more you are allowing them to justify suppression of YOUR ideas..

What's humane in respecting someone calling for genocide? Sure we should try to change their minds, I am not agitating for their liquidation, but for clawing out the political and cultural power back from their sweaty hands to try to turn away from the f-ing iceberg.

Metaphorical iceberg, because all the real ones will melt after trump dissolves the EPA.

[–] Maxxie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

What would happen if Biden was successful in stopping Trump but then, because we wouldn’t ever keep unfettered presidential power… right? RIGHT? We’re the “good” guys… what would happen if MAGA Republicans won in 2028? I doubt we’d ever have another election again.

From the standpoint of democracy that wouldn't be ideal, but why is republicans having 2(4) years of unchecked power better? They don't give a shit and gonna do a lot more damage to it.

Why is it ok when you agree with the outcome and not ok when you don’t?

Because the side coming to power wants to gleefully deport, repress and kill people, and the other one much less so. The good guys are "good" not because they respect the rules, but because they believe in humane values, in ending their fists when the others' faces begins and all that good stuff. The fascists are bad not because they break the law, but because they believe and want to do fascism.

If the rules are unjust then breaking them is an ethical imperative. And Trump not being in jail is frankly a crime against lady liberty.

[–] Maxxie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (27 children)

Breaking the rules isn't fascism though. Fascism is fascism.

What do you think is a more ethical choice:

a) uphold the law, knowing it will let fascist come to power and kill thousands

a) break the law and stop him

[–] Maxxie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Ideology is a sociopolitical model of the world. To understand complex system, we have to reduce it to key factors. It's important to remember that it is a fallible oversimplification, but without one we are lost in the noise, blindly reacting to immediate change.

[–] Maxxie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 1 week ago

If a bloke supports stripping of my rights, why would I respect his? Let him see what it's like. May be he'll learn a lesson, or at least be an example for others.

[–] Maxxie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 41 points 1 week ago

Enough of the "they go low we go high" bs, you can't defeat fascism with civility.

[–] Maxxie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 32 points 1 week ago

Applies even more to modern Russia..

[–] Maxxie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago

True, can't think of how would you combat a cleverly written aim-bot.

[–] Maxxie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Don't tell the client what's going on outside its vision, I suppose? Add a small buffer to compensate for latency, so wall hack would be more of a "corner hack".

[–] Maxxie@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

I imagine the alternative way to combat kernel-level cheats would be asking player for all his game state data, validating it on a server?

Wouldn't work on peer-to-peer and you'd have to do a bunch of unnecessary compute(recalculating every tick if player-generated data is possible according to game rules) but its the only way I can think of.

[–] Maxxie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Kinda makes sense? If you're monarchist, king's mental state should be your top concern.

If you're a fascist though you operate on vibes and therefore do not care.

view more: next ›