this post was submitted on 08 Dec 2024
167 points (70.0% liked)

Science Memes

11405 readers
1237 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 63 points 1 week ago (2 children)

This idea is overused as heavily dependant on which school you go to. My school taught a finance course, and gave advice on job seeking and interviews.

Also, mitochondria is usually taught at GCSE in the UK at least, which is not the last year of school. 'Mitochondria is the powerhouse of the cell' is very much a meme, it might have been interesting to use any other piece of useless information taught in schools instead.

[–] derekabutton@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago (3 children)

My favorite part of the "mitochondria is the powerhouse of the cell" memes (especially when cited as useless info being taught in school) is that it's grammatically incorrect. Mitochondria ARE because the word is plural, and any self respecting biology teacher knows that. The fact that this is cited as something drilled into students minds when people can't even recite it back properly is hilarious.

[–] FarceOfWill@infosec.pub 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

What the hell is a "powerhouse" anyway?

[–] FindME@lemmy.myserv.one 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

'Tis a house of power, milord.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 4 points 1 week ago

A freestanding building containing one or more power generators

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Aux@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago

Finances are taught in all schools in the UK, but statistics show that the majority of people don't remember shit and then make financial mistakes their whole life. And then they complain they're poor, lol.

[–] anton@lemmy.blahaj.zone 59 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Because the last five years have shown, that we have spend way to much time teaching people biology.

[–] m4xie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 week ago

That's exactly what I always say when people repeat this.

[–] Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

Imo, it's more an erosion of critical thinking rather than a lacking of specific biology facts.

[–] underwire212@lemm.ee 56 points 1 week ago (11 children)

Ok. So. Here’s my take.

No high schooler is EVER gonna pay even the slightest bit of attention if we incorporate a “taxes and accounting” class. No shot.

We learn certain general subjects like this in science mainly to learn critical thinking, analytical/logical reasoning skills, how to apply the scientific method (which, yes, can come in handy in many areas of life besides science).

No high schooler is EVER gonna pay even the slightest bit of attention if we incorporate a “taxes and accounting” class. No shot.

Ask any teacher who's taught it and they'll confirm. People just like to bullshit. They lie about not being taught things they were taught too. I'll bet many had a lesson that went over tax brackets etc and they just ignored it

[–] Doxatek@mander.xyz 7 points 1 week ago

Most of the people I know that complain about not being taught "real life skills" are absolute dumbasses that would have refused to pay attention anyway.

I had also been told this about something before where the guy had poured water on a flat top grill. As it was boiling off be was like "man this is real life right here, if school taught things like this I'd have paid attention" and I was like they did idiot you just didn't pay attention that's literally just water boiling smh lol

[–] Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

We learn certain general subjects like this in science mainly to learn critical thinking, analytical/logical reasoning skills, how to apply the scientific method (which, yes, can come in handy in many areas of life besides science).

Given your previous claim:

No high schooler is EVER gonna pay even the slightest bit of attention if we incorporate a “taxes and accounting” class. No shot.

What makes you think that they'd be any more likely to pay attention to any other subject matter?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] JordanZ@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

We had a class like that but it was an elective. It had things like how to balance a checkbook. While I don’t use checks very often I do understand how to manage it. Think I’ve had the same checkbook for 15-20 years. Went over basic tax stuff and interest for loans and whatnot.

I attended public school in a town my parents specifically chose for the schools though. City taxes are crazy because of it but I didn’t realize how much that mattered until I got into college.

Having to peer grade anything in college was excruciating. Even simple stuff like the standard five paragraph essay was a nightmare. The start was something that kinda introduced the topic. Then the conclusion was next followed by a wall of text ramblings that was supposed to be the body?…ugh. So the five paragraph essay was now three and incoherent. The spelling was usually awful as well and It was typed. Like how is that even possible? The computers totally had spell check back then.

[–] Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

[…] No high schooler is EVER gonna pay even the slightest bit of attention if we incorporate a “taxes and accounting” class. No shot. […]

Assuming that some high schoolers aren't going to pay attention to the lesson, wouldn't it still be better to at least try to teach something that has real life practical use rather than something that doesn't? At least the people who do pay attention will gain something useful — it doesn't make much sense to me to reduce the overall usefulness of what's taught simply because some may not pay attention.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 49 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It would probably make more sense to ask the bio teacher for sex ed than economics.

[–] Prunebutt 30 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Lol. Mainstream economics is nothing but ideologically charged excuses for the status quo. And you wouldn't learn heterodox econ in high school anyways.

At least we do know how mitochondria works.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] trucy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 1 week ago (6 children)

It has been taught, you weren't listening during math/economy classes dipshit

[–] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is what used to be taught in home economics class. Now it's just sewing and baking.

Knowing math isn't always enough to navigate the oft poorly written tax forms.

[–] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago

Tax forms change. And some little shit complaining "why do we have to learn percentages? Teach us something useful like how to do our taxes." would make for a better joke. And it would be more accurate.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] FindME@lemmy.myserv.one 26 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Frankly, we should move on from the mitochondria and start talking about the immune system. I want pre-schoolers to know about the interleukins, goddamnit! Let the children in first grade recite a list of adjuvants! And somebody ~~shoot~~shoo away vaccine deniers!

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 10 points 1 week ago

We need to train more medics in the Team Fortress 2 university, so they can shoo AND shoot vaccines at vaxx deniers

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] just_an_average_joe@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

But mitochondria is cool, it has its own dna because it used to be a separate organism. It fused with us, only to be made into a joke by us.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It also separates raw protons from hydrogen atoms and somehow turns it into spinny-motion, which it then turns into chemical energy with incredible efficiency. It’s a wild piece of biological machinery

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Dirac@lemmy.today 17 points 1 week ago

Cause it’s the teacher making this decision, riiiiiiight

[–] smeg@feddit.uk 15 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Do you guys call your teachers at school (i.e. not university) "professor"?

[–] shottymcb@lemm.ee 7 points 1 week ago

Not in the US. Professor is for college teachers.

[–] chevy9294@monero.town 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Yes, primary school is teacher, anything higher is professor.

[–] smeg@feddit.uk 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Where are you from out of interest?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 week ago (30 children)

If we're going to scrap something from high school to add a tax lesson, let's ditch some literature. Over four years my graduating class studied 5 shakespeare plays and a handful of sonnets. Surely we could have cut out Much Ado About Nothing and The Tempest if we still have Romeo & Juliet, Hamlet and Henry V.

[–] Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Reading comprehension is more important than ever ... And you want to cut the classes that teach it? Why?

[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I'm unconvinced that Shakespeare is a particularly good exercise in reading comprehension given the vocabulary, phraseology, spelling and grammar is 500 years out of date.

I remember reading Hamlet out loud in class, and that was the last of the plays we studied so we had read some Shakespeare before, and every other thing you're running into a sentence that doesn't work or a word that is NEVER said except in Hamlet like 'contumely" or 'orisons' and you just get a room full of teenagers saying words one by one taking none of it on board.

If anything, learning to understand words from a text without knowing their definition makes it better for that

[–] Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago (8 children)

I’m unconvinced that Shakespeare is a particularly good exercise in reading comprehension given the vocabulary, phraseology, spelling and grammar is 500 years out of date.

Hrm I'd argue that regardless of the parlance used in the work, it's still an exercise of reading comprehension, as one is still comprehending the work while reading it.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (29 replies)
[–] Yeller_king@reddthat.com 12 points 1 week ago

People seem to be conflating economics and personal finance.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee 5 points 1 week ago (11 children)

Bio is like a freshman/sophomore course. If you're taking it senior year, you're already behind in life

[–] ftbd@feddit.org 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You only have one year of bio in high school?

[–] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee 6 points 1 week ago

Unless you take AP, where they wouldn't be harping on this particular line about mitochondria, yes. One year of bio.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's different in different regions and it's certainly moved around over the years.

And the point remains, we graduate students who know what the powerhouse of a cell is but not how to do their taxes, work a 401k, put together a realistic budget, plan for major purchases, make a work schedule, or have any saleable skills other than being able bodied.

We aren't preparing people for life, we're warehousing them until college and if they don't go to college we just shove them into the cracks.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee 5 points 1 week ago

I understood the point, I agree with that. I wasn't commenting on that part

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

God forbid anyone taking a different path in life than you...

[–] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee 6 points 1 week ago

School systems set the path, and it's pretty standardized when these subjects get taught. They wait until kids get more math skills for physics classes to take place, meaning the less math heavy subjects go first, like bio and earth science.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›