this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2024
33 points (92.3% liked)

World News

398 readers
704 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be a decent person
  2. No spam
  3. Add the byline, or write a line or two in the body about the article.

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Just half a pound of the stuff may remove as much carbon dioxide as a tree can, according to early tests. Once the carbon is absorbed by the powder, it can be released into safe storage or be used in industrial processes, like carbonizing drinks.

“This really addresses a major problem in the tech field, and it gives an opportunity now for us to scale it up and start using it,” says Omar Yaghi, a chemist at the University of California, Berkeley. It’s not the first material to absorb carbon, but “it’s a quantum leap ahead [of other compounds] in terms of the durability of the material”.

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] remon@ani.social 24 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

‘quantum leap’ for industry

So ... the tiniest possible step forward?

[–] haverholm@kbin.earth 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

No no, the tiniest possible leap (practically equivalent to tiniest possible step except much more elaborate and important sounding)

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

There was an old tv show called quantum leap where the main character jumped through time. I assume this is what they are referring to, though no one under 45 years old will have heard of this tv show.

[–] haverholm@kbin.earth 2 points 3 weeks ago

I'm old enough to remember the show 👴 but the reference is (also) that people frequently use "quantum" to mean something large and impressive, like in this headline, when originally it means a shift in quantum states at a molecular or atomic level — i.e., teeny tiny and hardly noticeable.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

quantum leap
noun
: an abrupt change, sudden increase, or dramatic advance

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/quantum%20leap

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 21 points 3 weeks ago

I am calling it right now.

This will never be a thing.

I'll be happy if I am proven wrong though

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

OR - okay, Or we could stop oil production and move to 100% renewables.

[–] Iampossiblyatwork@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

It is clear to me you arent thinking about short term profitability. Please try to think of the shareholders.

[–] GreeNRG 2 points 3 weeks ago

OR-

We end oil production, move to renewables, and try to undo the damage we’ve already done.

[–] PumpkinSkink@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago

Ok. So we have this covalent organic network material that absorbs carbon. I have four questions: Whats the synthetic route? what's the cost per gram to make it?Where do you put the carbon dioxide after? What's powering the heat to desorb the carbon? Since they published in nature and the paper isn't on scihub atm I'm gonna guess: "expensive, fiddly, and difficult to scale, and actually we asked a grad student to make a kg of it a year ago and he's still working at the 1g scale and failing ", "about 25,000$/g", "We have one identical sentence in both the conclusion and abstract which says a few things we could do, but that we haven't actually tested", and "natural gas, if you're lucky".

[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 4 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

So what exactly does one do with it? How is it applied? The article says it could be used to carbonate drinks after absorbing enough carbon but also to build plants that produce carbon - I don't think they're going to use pieces of a wall to carbonate drinks.

[–] Amputret@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I think they mean they would be used to scrub the exhaust of plants that use carbon. Like we already do with sulphur to prevent acid rain.

[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Huh. I didn't know they used sulphur like that. Interesting!

[–] Amputret@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

I mean they have scrubbers to remove the sulphur in combustion products, the sulphur produces acid rain.

[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Oh. Okay, I know nothing about any of this. Makes me wish the article the article went into more detail even more.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 4 points 3 weeks ago

I am unfortunately old enough to remember being scared of acid rain, I just don't know what exactly is being done in plants about it. But thank you :)

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

So once you've captured the co2, you turn it into fun bubbles that go into the atmosphere?

Seems like adding a lot of extra steps just to make bubbles.

[–] Xenny@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Possibly put large carbon filters on ships?

[–] Zier@fedia.io 2 points 3 weeks ago

Nice try Dr Oz! That's just a bottle of Turmeric you quack!