this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2024
217 points (97.8% liked)

Work Reform

10021 readers
863 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] vvvvv@lemmy.world 12 points 17 hours ago

Working from his Twitter handbook, I see.

[–] FabledAepitaph@lemmy.world 15 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Can't wait until they fire the employees i need to review my environmental permit submittals and then can never get another project started legally ever again without risking insane amounts of fines four years later when the next administration comes in and hires new people.

[–] Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

They'll just completely gut the environmental regulations and eliminate all fines.

If we want to see what the future will be like for the US, than look no further than Putin's oligarchy.

[–] FabledAepitaph@lemmy.world 4 points 16 hours ago

Yeah, I am a little concerned about that too, but I can tell you that it is going to take YEARS of work to gut legislation like that. I am hoping that even with a Republican trifecta, they still won't be able to agree on and accomplish anything because they all hate eachother.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 5 points 16 hours ago

Theory: Elon is just trying to make more people want to move to Mars. Wait, hear me out...

[–] radicalautonomy@lemmy.world 12 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

To be perfectly honest, I hope they tank the entire country and western civilization by extension. I know, I know...the most oppressed among us will suffer the most. Like, I get it.

But the fall of capitalism has been in the fucking mail for a few decades now, and I need it to hurry up and happen. My autism leads me to get irrationally anxious and upset when natural consequences don't ensue, and everything still not having come crashing down around us when it is what this country deserves is REALLY fucking with my head.

[–] Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 16 hours ago

I admire your optimism, but I am more skeptical. Capitalist oligarchy has left Russia a pale, pathetic shadow of the super power that it once was, but capitalism is not even remotely close to collapsing in Russia.

[–] DeadWorldWalking@lemmy.world 11 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (2 children)

You are part of the poorest in our society.

If your household makes more than 350k/yr and posses more than 100mil in total wealth then you will not feel the effects.

If you arent that rich your life is going to become much worse.

Accelerationism is the ideology of a child with rage issues who breaks their own things because they're thowing a fit.

[–] Lennny@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago

So...someone with autism?

[–] radicalautonomy@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

How will the uberwealthy not feel the effects of capitalism crumbling and money becoming worthless?

[–] DeadWorldWalking@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

If you read the comment then you'll see that it doesn't say that

[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago

I like you. Here's a video you'd like.

https://youtu.be/PaASqPnpq5Y

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 20 hours ago

Trump and Musk don't want employees or workers, they want courtiers.

[–] Badeendje@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ending remote work is just a way to get people to quit.

[–] bitchkat@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago

Yes that's what the article says.

[–] Hegar@fedia.io 87 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Their obvious incompetence is why putin choose them to lead our country.

[–] phubarr@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I've been telling people for years, Russia most certainly influenced the outcome of the US elections because they have a huge interest in placing inept, incompetent, easily manipulated fools in power, in their "enemy" countries.

It wouldn't surprise me if they had something to do with an actor becoming president of Ukraine. They had plans to take Ukraine, and they didn't want a real politician in power when they tried it.

[–] Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

My theory is that Putin blames the US for destroying the Soviet Union. He blames us for forcing the USSR into a cold war it never wanted and he saw first hand how endless anti-communist propaganda turned the whole western world against the USSR.... So now he believes he is doing to the US what we did to the USSR, bombarding us with endless disinformation and propaganda to destroy our country from the inside out.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago

Wow. That makes a lot of sense and is a take I've never heard or thought of.

[–] phubarr@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

Well done! That is incredibly interesting insight. It makes total sense, I think you're completely right. Thank you for sharing your thoughts. I'm going to let that marinate in my brain for a good while.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 day ago

they have a huge interest in placing inept, incompetent, easily manipulated fools in power, in their “enemy” countries.

They have really outdone themselves this time. It's actually impressive.

[–] riodoro1@lemmy.world 58 points 1 day ago (2 children)

How the fuck did you idiots end up with musk as an advisor to a mentally challenged president!?

[–] Zess@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago

Political bribery is legal in the US and musky gave Trump a lot of money.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 57 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Because half the voting population is idiots.

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 34 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Especially the half that didn't vote

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 23 points 1 day ago

It was a joint effort of idiocy.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 12 points 1 day ago
[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 14 points 1 day ago

I know what I said.

[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

More like a third, or less. Only about half to 60% of eligible people vote in any given election.

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 42 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Wouldn’t work from home allow the government to sell office buildings it doesn’t need, and therefore save money?

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 5 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Not likely, and there's a...well, not really good...maybe understandable, or relatable... reason for it.

It has to do with the cost of commercial real estate, and the government being a barometer for private sector.

If the government says "everyone RTO", companies be like "cmon that means us too". Especially so for government contractors.

But if people stay remote...then there's no need for these big buildings in cities. So they sit vacant or underutilized. And then there's a surplus of commercial real estate, and the commercial real estate sector falls in on itself, and a bunch of other bad things happen.

But wait, there's more.

Why live in expensive, densely packed, overpriced cities, if not for being in close proximity to high paying jobs? Likely what would follow is urban residential and MDU/MFU values tanking as there's an exodus from cities and nearby towns. And while that might be good for people who don't own property, a lot of people, especially middle-class people in commuter-ville, will probably be losing their nest-egg. More than likely to be picked up cheap by somebody to build a warehouse or a datacenter or luxury condos or something. Something that takes up a lot of space but doesn't need a lot of staff.

[–] Zess@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

People will quit on their own or get fired for not following the order, either way forfeiting any severance pay. Then the remaining people who RTO will be overworked because they're seen as desperate to keep their job.

And in case it's not obvious, musky and ramyswamy don't actually give a shit about government efficiency. Trump appointed them as repayment for helping his campaign and they'll probably both steal money from the government and get pardoned by Trump if they get caught.

And now Trump stuck Greene in there with them to get her to shut up about ethics reports.

[–] bitchkat@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

They'll most likely cut shit that helps them personally. Leon doesn't like the FTC and anything that he thinks is inconvenient to his companies.

[–] BossDj@lemm.ee 41 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah but work from home pisses off two major Republican sub-groups. One- being someone's boss gives them a woody. A chance to feel like they're towering over someone else gives them meaning to their life. Two- republicans hate when people have it better than them, thus born the stereotype of it being truly American to work harder for less money. Get those lazy asses back to hard murican labor, and no free healthcare.

[–] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 20 points 1 day ago

Three - they're heavily invested in commercial real estate and need bodies in suites to throw more gold on their hoard

[–] Shotgun_Alice@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

I hope they don’t, I applied for a federal job that was offering remote work and flex scheduling which would be a big help in my life. I’m having to help take care of my mom as she gets older and I can’t just up and move to DC.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

does elon have a non-ai picture that doesn't look exactly like a troglodyte?

[–] KingGordon@lemmy.world 41 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Thats a great way to make the economy even better!

[–] phubarr@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They just CAN'T let us have something. They don't even have a good reason to take it from us, they just don't want us to have it.

They do have a reason. Their real estate holdings aren't as profitable.

[–] sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Can't wait until all those workers move to European based companies.

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

I hope not. I want to get there first. Don't need Americans to fuck even that opportunity.

[–] DerArzt@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago

I wonder what the Unions that those workers are a part of would do?

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Are federal workers unionized in the US? I see the article says some are.

[–] redhorsejacket@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yes. However, federal trade unions are muzzled in the sense that it is against the law for a federal employee to engage in a strike. It's been on the books since the 50s, but the balance of power really shifted when Reagan enforced it against 10,000 striking air traffic controllers. Some were incarcerated, and nearly all were blackballed from ever working a government job ever again (though that was eventually rescinded in the 90s). There's no doubt now that even a "liberal" president would follow suit in the event another illegal strike occurred.

[–] bitchkat@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

They were also embroiled in a railroad strike a few years back.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 day ago

I guess that might become a battleground for them to kill labor rights.

[–] AceFuzzLord@lemm.ee 12 points 1 day ago

If M*sk actually worked a day in his life, he'd have a brain aneurysm. He works the same way a cat who gets everything handed to them because they're too lazy to move works.