this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2024
46 points (72.5% liked)

Technology

59366 readers
5173 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Published: October 31, 2024

top 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] x00z@lemmy.world 43 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Ah yes, greenwashing. Thanks Microsoft.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 10 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Wood on concrete πŸ₯³!

[–] demizerone@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Should have been wood on used tires!

[–] Trigger2_2000@sh.itjust.works 5 points 10 hours ago

Wood colored concrete πŸ€”!

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 16 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Wood? You mean Fire's Favourite Food?

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 hours ago

Fire suppression systems, and fire prevention mechanisms, are no joke in a data center.

Plenty of systems that displace oxygen in the room to prevent combustion.

Many places won't let you even bring combustable materials into the data center spaces. Receiving department unboxes and puts cardboard right into the baler. Wanna store stuff in your cage? Better be in a tote.

Also, humidity is strictly controlled to prevent static buildup.

The most likely place for a fire to break out in a data center would be from battery backup systems. But at the scale that most large facilities have, there is a dedicated battery room, or they use something else for instantaneous load transfer, like flywheels.

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (2 children)

What does a datacenter need a huge glass front for? Slashing carbon emissions? Yeah right.

[–] Sporkbomber@lemm.ee 2 points 7 hours ago

Clients looking to rent data center space still like to see pretty spaces in their giant concrete boxes. So on a campus there is usually one of the builds that has something prettier for the front admin section.

But square footage is money, so it's much smaller.

They actually go for LEED certification for their spaces a lot of times. So they get an energy efficiency badge for a building that uses the total power of a ~3500 homes (in the builds I have seen) 24/7/365.

[–] random_character_a@lemmy.world 16 points 22 hours ago

Maybe it's meant to let the sun in and save on the heating... in... a buildind that has significant excess of... nevermind.

[–] WraithGear@lemmy.world 83 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

This is a puff peice to distract. Microsoft has made no effort to lessen their carbon footprint.

[–] brlemworld@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago

Technically it just makes their carbon footprint even larger

[–] SilverFlame@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I recently had a tour of the Redmond campus. They have multiple geothermal wells for power as well as an air conditioning system that uses almost no energy, it was pretty neat.

[–] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Too bad all that cool stuff is negligible compared to what actually makes a difference

[–] b3an@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago

With huge campuses some business have, I wouldn't call it negligible. Unless you yourself are running a huge business campus and have some insight on how these noobs should be doing it. πŸ˜…

[–] bebabalula@feddit.dk 36 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Talk about putting lipstick on a pig…

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 12 points 23 hours ago

No no. Those trees died of natural causes. /s

[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 30 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If they really cared about carbon emissions, they would shut down all of their AI crap.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 5 points 21 hours ago

Shut down themselves even better.

[–] not_that_guy05@lemmy.world 42 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Slash emissions by using the dead bodies of the source that removes carbon?

[–] gsfraley@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I mean, that's the mechanism by which carbon is removed. It goes into tree, tree dies or gets cut down taking all the solidified carbon with it, new tree gets planted in its place to repeat the cycle. In fact, the fastest way to scrub carbon with the practice is to farm trees, assuming you do it sustainably.

[–] db2@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (4 children)

You mean sequestered, not removed. It's one fire away from being back in circulation.

[–] obviouspornalt@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 12 hours ago

Only the current generation of trees. The previous generations that have been broken down into soil are mostly not going back into the atmosphere as co2

[–] credo@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Well, don’t set any data centers on fire.

But what if I really want to :(

[–] db2@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Noted for the future.

[–] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Do you propose some alchemy that transforms carbon to another element? Remove carbon from the atmosphere and stop putting more up in there.

[–] ulterno@programming.dev 1 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

graph of binding energy per nucleon for stable nuclei

And gives some energy (and building material) in the process? Yeah, it's just kinda hard.

[–] HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

So is every tree

[–] themurphy@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So the best thing you can do with a tree, is to cut it down and use it as materials, if we want to release as little CO2 as possible?

And ofc this depends on new trees being planted in its stead.

[–] 0x0@programming.dev 1 points 12 hours ago

And ofc this depends on new trees being planted in its stead.

Hence farming trees...

[–] BombOmOm@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

Trees are carbon neutral. They pull the carbon out and sequester it in themselves. When they rot or burn, the carbon is returned.

[–] Cryan24@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So lots of heat plus combustible material.. That sounds like a winning idea to me.

[–] Blemgo@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

If memory serves right, one of Germany's datacenters went up in flames a few years ago because they had wooden flooring and no adequate fire suppression systems.

EDIT: it was in France, and Europe's biggest datacenter.

[–] aeno@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Blemgo@lemmy.world 4 points 21 hours ago

Ah, seems to be right, my bad.

Also, to correct myself a bit more: it was Europe's biggest datacenter.

[–] gencha@lemm.ee 17 points 1 day ago

I've also put wood panels on my car to save the environment. It's pretty useful.

[–] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 16 points 1 day ago

LOL they are trying to trick us. Microsoft we see you.

[–] veeesix@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

Woot! Heavy timber construction!