this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2024
41 points (95.6% liked)

Electric Vehicles

301 readers
335 users here now

Electric Vehicles are a key part of our tomorrow and how we get there. If we can get all the fossil fuel vehicles off our roads, out of our seas and out of our skies, we'll have a much better environment. This community is where we discuss the various different vehicles and news stories regarding electric transportation.

Related communities:

founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There are quite a few around my area. They are beyond ridiculous and stupid looking. I cringe every time I see one because I am sure that the guy driving feels so cool when in fact it is just embarrassing.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It’s amazing that they are considered street legal in the US.

[–] Montagge@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

We can have these pieces of shit but not actually small pickups

[–] Gerudo@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Ford Maverick, almost the same size as the old school rangers and S10s

[–] Montagge@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No 6ft or 8ft bed option though. It only comes with a 4.5ft bed.

[–] Gerudo@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

Yeah its a little small, but a bed extender can get you the 6 ft.

[–] Voyajer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I think the only thing it's missing out on is box length and ride height? I'm not sure why they didn't reuse the Ranger model name and gave the new ranger a different name.

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Montagge@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Those aren't small lol! I was thinking more like S10 sized!

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Ok that's fair. It's a shame they don't make the 90's s10s and rangers any more, but I think it was a safety thing.

[–] Montagge@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 day ago

It's mostly poorly written legislation and Americans wanting bigger and bigger cars. CAFE, or corporate average fuel efficiency, is the main culprit. It's in dire need of an overhaul. I'm hoping we'll get a small electric pickup someday.

As for safety you might be thinking of kei trucks which are gaining popularity in the US, but aren't registerable in most states due to safety regulations.

[–] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

I miss those little Datsun pickups. About the size of an S10 and you could beat the absolute hell out of them and they'd still run.

Same with the 70s Ford Courrier. My buddy had one that I know for a fact he rolled. Cracked the door so you had to slam it to get it closed. Sumbitch kept running.

[–] BigTrout75@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I would rather drive around in the Oscar Meyer wiener mobile. They look better. But honestly, just make a normal stupid ev truck.

[–] buzz86us@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Yeah I'm looking for something like the Changan E07 just without the power bits. That type of design seems like the perfect solution to me. Nice aerodynamics for efficiency, then truck functionality when it is actually needed

[–] dev_null@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Finally not having a backlog and finally letting people buy them without a waitlist, like a normal car, seems like a good thing for them?

It's a bad car that no one should buy, but I'm not sure how the title is trying make it seem like a store's shelves finally not being empty is a bad thing.

[–] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

It is a bad thing (for the company) if nobody's buying them...

[–] dev_null@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I agree, but this article doesn't state that nobody is buying them. It states they have enough for the demand.

[–] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Did we read the same article? The opinion of the author is that there isn't enough demand to buy the current production

[–] dev_null@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

You are right, I worded it wrong. What I mean is that the opinion of the author doesn't seem based on any facts reported. The only facts shown is that the company is no longer behind with production.

It could be that they are now producing more than there is demand for, but the article doesn't show anything indicating that.

[–] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

Oh, yah, in that case sure

[–] BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

So they can store them and fix them right in the company. Sounds like a time saver.

[–] MisterD@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The cybertruck would be one of the first things to fail in a difficult situation.

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

It’s ironic that the metal ball segment of the unveiling was, overall, an honest representation of the final robustness.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

If the dual motor isn't selling well that doesn't bode well.

Of all the reveal specs, it was actually the closest to the advertised specs and price after inflation.

With inflation after the delay it'd be about 61k. Sells for 80k. The final vehicle has more range though, offsetting the 19k gap a bit.

The RWD and Tri were much further off.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Let’s see if Musk’s Trump cheerleading managed to trick any MAGA-ites into buying these.

[–] iamericandre@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Yeah I’m sure we’ll see trailer parks full of cyber trucks

[–] Zier@fedia.io 2 points 1 day ago

The all new (lol) 2024 CyberJunk. Call now!

[–] Jesusaurus@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Send em back, sounds like they need fixing