this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2024
910 points (97.8% liked)

Progressive Politics

1116 readers
595 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] N0body@lemmy.dbzer0.com 151 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (8 children)

I’m going to be ignoring the news for the next couple years. “Trump Did Something Horrific,” followed by nothing of any consequence but “raising awareness.”

Wake me up when there’s a real resistance.

[–] pedz@lemmy.ca 31 points 1 week ago

I'm not American and will do the same. The amount of artificial and inflated drama is just unbearable. Not for another four years.

"Trump said this unacceptable thing!!!1!" followed by a few days of outrage, nothing changes, then he says another stupider shit a few days layer and the cycle continues.

In a way I'm sure the media are very happy for that Trump win. They're gonna have some drama every fucking day.

[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ah yes the embodiment of the French Revolutionaries spirit. Paraphrasing the slogan, wasn't it something like

"wake me up my brothers after the king gets beheaded, why would I go out with my pitchfork if nothing's gonna happen".

[–] Dashi@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

I can't speak to others but it's exhausting. All the "did something illegal" "got egg on the face of the US" "made a clown of himself". I can only be outraged for so long before I'm burned out. I've voted every election big and small. I've argued and talked with people about how bad this could be. I've told people who didn't know there are still literal wars going on and how there is an avenue for ww3. People don't care or they think trump is the one to see us through and any changes he wants to make are good.

What else can I do? I'm not going to take up arms because I still believe in our democracy.

[–] yetiftw@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

get organized! there are loads of community-based action groups that provide mutual aid services. the democratic socialists of America is a great example but there are plenty of other options if that's not for you

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] cerement 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

be sure to hashtag that resistance!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 116 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If there is no enforcement then there is no law.

[–] Manalith@midwest.social 24 points 1 week ago

There is enforcement, if you don't have enough income or if you have the wrong skin tone-

[–] LibertyLizard 72 points 1 week ago (5 children)

How about we do something about it instead of expecting someone else to?

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 21 points 1 week ago (17 children)

You go first. Let us know what and how it worked out.

[–] LibertyLizard 39 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (7 children)

I don’t even know what this text is in reference to and I have no concrete suggestions immediately. But I will be thinking, connecting, and sharing in the coming months as a strategy emerges. Trumpism can still be defeated. The election was plan A but it’s time to come up with plan B. I am thinking that it’s going to take massive organized civil disobedience. We directly disrupt their ability to govern and harm marginalized people.

But it’s going to take more than just me, so I ask everyone here to be ready and participate in whatever capacity you can.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[–] Elgenzay@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 week ago

Yeah! You first

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 56 points 1 week ago (9 children)

Trump will go down in history as the world's most successful career criminal.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] zarathustra0@lemmy.world 44 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Is it really a law if it's unenforceable?

[–] PlantDadManGuy@lemmy.world 35 points 1 week ago (1 children)

*selectively enforced against poor people

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 10 points 1 week ago
  • The understood value of "poor" will also increase.
[–] clutchtwopointzero@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Is it really justice when laws cannot be applied to presidents as the founding fathers argued that doing so would interfere with president's purported ability to govern - even if they commit crimes?

The USA is comically naive in assuming presidents would act honorably and would respect the law voluntarily.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] affiliate@lemmy.world 40 points 1 week ago (2 children)

as someone who has never used twitter, it always confuses me that twitter sometimes puts the reply before the message that’s being replied to. why do it this way?

[–] eselover@lemmy.today 30 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It isn't so much as a reply on a re-tweet, if you comment or "reply" to any tweet then the layout is the same as any other social media site and nests it under the post. Whereas for re-tweeting it is more like sharing something, like a link or an article, and your desired message into a post, just like here in lemmy your title or message is at the top and your content is under it. In this context the tweet is your content.

I hope that made sense

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 38 points 1 week ago

No I'm sure the current plan of wag your finger and then refuse to actually enforce the law out of a desire to "not sink to his low" will continue to work just fine /s

[–] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 37 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I'm not an American. Does Congress actually have the ability to enforce the laws they write? What would someone expect a Senator to do?

[–] Hildegarde@lemmy.world 41 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Warren's party currently controls the executive branch. Though she can't enforce the law, she knows and works with those who can.

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

works with those who can.

*with those who should be able to

Ftfy

[–] DiagnosedADHD@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They won't. They are going to hand the keys to the next admin, as is decorum. They do things by the book and maintain tradition. This party at every opportunity shows how completely inept they are.

They've abandoned us.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 16 points 1 week ago

And they have had that "official acts" thing from the supreme court for months. Zero reason this problem should have ever lasted this long.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

If they had a house majority and 60 Senators then they could either never inaugurate Trump or remove him via impeachment and vote to remove, same with federal judges he appointed.

Problem is they only had 60 for one month over a decade ago, now currently don't even have a majority.

The USA voted for crime and destruction.

[–] problematicPanther@lemmy.world 36 points 1 week ago (12 children)

This was the last time i vote for a dem candidate. they pay mouth service to progressive policies, but at the end of the day, they do next to nothing for us.

back in in the 2010s when obama was president, there was a time when the dems controlled the house AND the senate at the same time. we still didn't get any real progressive shit passed. the only thing i can think of is daca and obamacare. we didn't get single payer, universal nationalized healthcare, we didn't get robust protections for the working class, we didn't responsibly pull out of iraq or afghanistan, the environment is fucked and there's nothing that we can do about it anymore, big banks got bailed out at the expense of the working class, university cost was and has continued to be at an all time high. They didn't fix the gerrymandering the gop has been getting away with. They didn't set term limits on justices. they didn't fight back when the Rs blocked merick garland. They did nothing to fix the broken electoral system. They did nothing to fix the economic policies set in the reagan era. they did nothing to set a law banning PACs, lobbyists or special interests. the only thing the dem party has going for it is that they are not literally the party of fascists.

2 weeks before the election wasn't the time to start getting excited about a third party. The time for third partying is now, and keep it up until the next one. I'm not going to forgive the dem party for their inaction and they should absolutely be punished by no longer existing as the opposition party.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Didn't even close fucking Guantanamo. Remember Guantanamo? It's still a thing.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Nick Fuentes address is public and he's still breathing. Tells me all I need to know about liberal activists.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 39 points 1 week ago (3 children)

You could say that about all activists. It's not like the leftists don't think Nick Fuentes is a Nazi shitstain. You know it, why are you here posting rather than carrying out the assassination you're condemning others for not performing?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

"I'll make it legal" -Palpatine

[–] rational_lib@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

Twitter is dumb as fucking fuck. Political leaders shouldn't be there. If you shitpost, you shouldn't be in charge of anything but shitposting.

load more comments
view more: next ›